Sentences with phrase «more money your games»

The more games you launch on the market, this is the common logic, the more money your games manage to print.

Not exact matches

Most mobile games are free, but ask you to pay money in order to get more items or upgrades.

Success at the Games means more government money for physical education programs, which supposedly encourage kids to get off the couch — and ironically leave their video games behind — to go exercise so they don't get fat.

It also causes them to have more «skin in the game,» if you will, where they could become even more aligned in helping grow the business because their money is now at risk as well as yours.

Even MORE money is at stake than what Kobe or even the best rock bands in the world can make by being at the top of their game.

While proceeds from a Caesars Interactive online games unit sale will help the bankruptcy estate, junior creditors may still object to the distribution of the funds because more money will end up in the hands of first lien banks and lenders.

But people took issue with the fact that the game's developers tipped the scales in favor of people willing to spend more money, known among gaming fans as «pay to win.»

«Employers who are serious about their future and about addressing the skills gap need to put more money in the game,» he said, pointing to an OECD report that found Canadian companies have an abysmal record on skills training.

In this game, the more you trust your partner and share money initially, the more money you both make in the end.

Publishers [currently] KNOW that they will not make money on resold games, so they charge more to you, the first buyer.

Consumers are spending more time playing games; they're also becoming more willing to make in - game purchases — spending real money to buy, say, new weapons for their fictional characters — enabling some companies to replace a dependency on new hits with a steady, recurring revenue stream.

Once it can no longer find anyone to download the game that owns an iPhone, it will likely have to shake things up by introducing something new to convince more people to spend money.

«If you wan na gamble, somebody else will come along and pay more money tomorrow, that's one kind of game.

And staying in the game makes you more money in the long run.

But Mr. Kutcher is the most prominent entertainment figure in the high - tech venture capital game, and he puts more than his money into it.

He interviewed more than 50 of the world's top investors for his last book «Money: Master the Game,» a New York Times best - seller that's sold more than a million copies.

They tend to view life as a game, which one «wins» by accumulating more toys / money than one's rivals.

Author of six internationally bestselling books, including the recent New York Times # 1 best - seller MONEY: Master the Game and UNSHAKEABLE, Mr. Robbins has empowered more than 50 million people from 100 countries through his audio, video and life training programs.

Of course, buying expensive risk assets on the view that they're going to become more expensive is a dangerous game to play, but since government funding crises hammer risk assets while printing money inflates them, such funding crises should present decent value opportunities to buy into beaten up assets before the inflation ride.

The gameplay itself is always based around that idea that no matter how much money you pour in, the game will always ask for more.

I know in this cycle, the W2 borrowers paid more money down so there is some skin in the game.

You can relax in your favorite armchair and access the Vegas Winner casino online, collect the welcome bonus worth up to 3,000 and use the extra money to play more European, American or Turbo blackjack games.

i don't get it, he claims it's about money but game time and wanting to play in midfield, but he won't get more game time at chelsea and conte will use him as a WB just like wenger.

To me it seems that this was done so more fans can attend games and ultimately earn the board more money.

«We might (receive more gate money), but we've banged on a bit about the romance of the cup this season, so many people were disappointed when we drew AFC Wimbledon and the game was not live on television.

No more paying my hard earned money by buying tickets for games or buying jerseys or other Arsenal Accessories I will watch the games on TV and keep my money.

Just maybe getting a new striker in would sharpen the theo and the OG's game a little more and add to our options up front and that can only be a good thing, or is it YOUR money?

Bottom line, if he is angered bench the players who were not good enough and play those who deserve some game time based on the Southampton game or on games where they had a positive impact: - Take Özil out and play Ox in the hole (he has to understand your the highest paid player of the club, your given freedom like nobody else and your even seeking even more money with a new contract you can't play like that ever and go AWOL)- Put Sanchez on the wing or up top but put Welbeck in (Walcott didn't track back near enough for the Alsonso goal)- Iwobi has been bright from the wing let him play there - Xhaka has to go back in the holding midfield role and I would take out Coquelin because he could've taken a foul on the hazard's goal.

Alexis came with a good spirit, seing Ozil on board, thinking a team would be built around them but year after year, it is no top class addition with a guessing game plan, weakness all over the pitch, players out of position, a team scared to play and lost as manager... Sanchez then started to ask more money, we said no as to Ozil; waiting 6 month later to be on last year contract... The all management is nuts and Alexis or any players try until they get fed up, Ozil plays to get fit for wrld cup and his value back...

His form was patchy at best and when The Ox was moved back there for a few games he showed up far better than Bellerin had been doing.He seems to have been a bit more consistent lately but if we are offered the type of fee being touted by Juve and Madrid etc then grab the money quickly - he ain't that good.

That was part of the point after all: more games equals more money, and also equals less chance of any shocks.

Want to track these lines, betting %'s, bet signals, sharp money and more for every game and every sport?

If more bets are being placed on a game, it's more likely that oddsmakers will be forced to adjust their lines based on an influx of square money.

You would have made more money if they won those games by more than one run.

With the public fairly split in this game, the line has dropped to -119 at Olympic, indicating more money has...

To say it isn't effective is talking BS, it is prob the most effective thing we supporters could do but it wont happen because of people like you who want people to spend money and go to games, spend a bit more on banners and go pay AFC # 60 to hold a #SilentStanOut sign or whatever.

Hockey fans never seem to suspect that the play - off games could possibly be a gimmick to wring more money from their pockets; they practically fight to get tickets.

This game is already receiving more than twice as many bets as any other game this weekend, and it appears sportsbooks will need to take some LSU money during the week.

For bigger games, it's possible that if you sold fewer ads, you could sell them each for more money.

To keep the momentum going and to try and raise more money for Leukemia research and the Chuckstrong charity, one of the Colts Cheerleaders, Megan M., has pledged to shave her head if the Colts raise $ 10,000 by their November 25th game against the Bills.

If the networks and conferences can make money by airing more games, more days of the week, then it is here to stay.

Participation, vending machines and congressional committees aside, the $ 64 question, or more accurately the $ 1.5 billion question, is: Why do corporations shell out hard money so that employees can play games?

If he believes he is worth more than anyone else, he should play out his contract and have a monster 16 game season that justifies the money.

I love Barcelona always will and been loving this club since the Ronaldinho days, but it's been about 2 to 3 years now that this club is showing stupidity and no ambition whatsoever, bad signings, a dumbass coach that has never won anything important, and loosing the future of soccer and not realizing it, also used that money on a player that gets benched for champions league??? This is driving me crazy the more I think bout it, I'm so sad and still so hurt, Iama wach the game because of the love I have for this club, but honestly I don't see our ambition, we have Messi another two to three years, please Barca don't fuck those years up I beg you!!!!

Let's stop thinking that just throwing money around is the one and only approach to winning a game successfully and maybe think about a more tactical approach and breeding more players like the Shearer's, Wrights and Cole's.

There is, difficult as it seems to fathom, a lot more to a tribal game like football than making money.

For all the talk about Chelsea's depth you only have to look at their bench to see he didn't have too many potential game - changers, he had Remy but after that not too much eg: Cuadrado, Mikel, Loftus - Cheek, Ramires — bit of a mixed bag and for my money AS offered more than any of them as an impact player with a great engine to boot.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Money is now more important than any other factor in deciding the quality of a top team in the PL EXCEPT Arsenal and Wenger clearly feels betrayed by United for making it a money Money is now more important than any other factor in deciding the quality of a top team in the PL EXCEPT Arsenal and Wenger clearly feels betrayed by United for making it a money money game.

And while there are fewer games in football, there is more money to be made than in basketball.