«
The more narrowing of the curriculum occurs and the more teachers feel compelled to teach to Sats, the more teachers will be unhappy.
Not exact matches
Since 2001, the
curriculum in many elementary schools has
narrowed to little
more than a steady diet
of reading and math.
Critics, including many teachers unions and some policy experts, say the method is based on flawed tests that don't measure the
more intangible benefits
of good teaching and lead to a
narrow curriculum.
Government accountability measures such as the EBacc have been criticised for
narrowing the
curriculum in schools, with many seen to be prioritising
more academic subjects at the expenses
of creative areas.
This system necessitates the growth and expansion
of standardized tests into
more subject areas and grades to provide
more data for evaluations, further
narrowing the
curriculum and alienating students.
In many content areas, minority students are feeling the impact
of the
narrowing curriculum much
more than their nonminority peers are.
It also — very handily — diverts attention from criticism
of their changes to the
curriculum towards a
narrower more restricting academic offer.
Reducing the stakes would help eradicate some
of the perverse incentives that result in a
narrowing curriculum and
more exclusions.
Identifying the gaps in supporting student learning and their transitions Strategizing to target gaps in order to
narrow them Mapping the
curriculum continuum
of expectations grades 6 to 9, to provide depth
of knowledge and understanding which leads to
more effective mathematics instruction and assessment Focusing on instructional continuity and continuity
of supports supports for student needs.
That will be a
narrowing of curriculum far
more extensive than the
narrowing of content [E / LA and Math emphasized
more than other content areas] that folks complain about now.
This
narrowing of curriculum is also evidenced by mathematics classrooms that look
more like «test practice» classes than classrooms devoted to teaching students to think, problem solve, and act as mathematicians.
She argues that school reformers assume that schools can do
more to address poverty than is realistic, that accountability policies encourage
narrowing of the
curriculum and teaching to the test, that vouchers have accumulated no significant evidence
of effectiveness, that «virtual charter schools» are a ripoff
of taxpayers, and that there are
more effective policy solutions that are far from test - based accountability and «school choice» policies: social services for poor families, early childhood education, protecting the autonomy
of teachers and elected school boards, reducing class sizes, eliminating for - profit companies and chains from operating charter schools, and aggressively fighting racial and socioeconomic segregation in schools.
a) With a focus on the end
of year testing, there inevitably will be a
narrowing of the
curriculum as teachers focus
more on test preparation and skill and drill teaching [6].
I don't know what teachers she is observing, but the teachers I see in the schools today are the best and brightest I've ever seen — and are doing heroic work in spite
of the most difficult conditions we've ever faced as a profession: meager resources; dwindling budgetary support; a
narrowing of the
curriculum leading to cuts to music, art and PE; withering attacks from Rhee, Kopp, Gates and Duncan and friends; an obsession with standardized testing; and much
more.
«In addition, I believe that this speaks
more generally
of a
narrowed curriculum, focused not on sound subject teaching as a basis for successful progression, but on preparation to pass exams.»
According to FairTest, «(H) igh - stakes testing is far
more likely to lower the quality
of curriculum, instruction and school climate in schools serving children
of color: Facing high - stakes test - based accountability under NCLB and state laws, schools
narrow curriculum by reducing or dropping untested subjects.