Not exact matches
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries
more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution
nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
And
more often than not, it imposes upon an ancient Near Eastern text Western assumptions regarding gender roles and the
nuclear family, rendering the woman celebrated in Proverbs 31, for example, into little
more than a happy homemaker prototype.
Forasteros» review of «Real Marriage» for Relevant «The model of marriage,
family and maturity the Driscolls build is
more a reinvigorated idealization of the
nuclear family than something that arises from the Scriptures.
The distinction between the
nuclear and traditional
family was also blurred in the recent report on human sexuality by the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) titled Keeping Body and Soul Together: «Although many Christians in the post-World War II era have a special emotional attachment to the
nuclear family, with its employed father, mother at home, and two or
more school - aged children, that profile currently fits only 5 percent of North American households.»
The idea of the
nuclear family, on the other hand, refers to a bonded mother and father raising one or
more children.
The small
family unit known as a
nuclear family today is the typical
family type of the modern era in Western cultures.1 During the last two hundred years, identity has been associated
more with the
family unit than with larger social units like a congregation.
The further you move away from a healthy, white, married
nuclear family with a male head of household, etc etc, the
more «vulnerable» you become to using formula.
If you can refer me to
more helpful information on attachment parenting in the
nuclear family / western context, I'd be grateful.
We should situate fathers» effects in social and individual context, whereby (say) effects may be
more pronounced and important in isolated
nuclear families in low - fertility high social capital contexts, but less visible in extended
families with higher fertility and
more substitutable forms of childcare.
The
nuclear family as traditionally defined is becoming
more of a minority, and this petrifies the Tories.
«The closing of the James A. FitzPatrick
Nuclear Power Plant will devastate the lives of the
more than 600 employees and their
families.
«The closing of the James A. FitzPatrick
Nuclear Power Plant will devastate the lives of
more than 600 employees and their
families.
«The closing of the James A. FitzPatrick
Nuclear Power Plant will devastate the lives of the
more than 600 employees and their
families,» Cuomo said.
There may be an underlying lesson here for Dominica's
more industrialized neighbors: Although
nuclear families are the bedrock of Western societies, they're also prone to rifts and tremors — and children tend to fall through the cracks.
Assignment of alleles to haplotypes for nearly all the variants on all chromosomes can be performed by genetic analysis of a
nuclear family with three or
more children.
White men are
more likely to have been raised in a two - parent household and therefore tend to gravitate toward desiring that style of
nuclear family for themselves.
And in order to prevent the formation of any
nuclear families, orgies were the order of the day, and no one was allowed to mate with the same person for
more than two nights in a row.
In transforming this topical expose into a
more metaphorical critique of the
nuclear family, consumer society, and the social (mis) education of children, the film resonates with ideological implications that still have the power to unsettle.
Newsarama also continues to argue that any new attempt at the property should embrace a
more faithful, older version of the team and one of if not the most distinguishing characteristics of the concept - that they are already a fully - formed, extended
nuclear family.
This is one of those books that makes it a little
more difficult to sleep at night, knowing there exists a country with
nuclear bomb capacity that despises the West (in particular the U.S.) and is controlled by an egomaniacal
family who seemingly will stop at nothing to achieve their bizarre goals (Vicki C).
Every day that we hold out for the perfect
nuclear family to adopt,
more dogs die.
If I participate in a 1st world economy it wouldn't be good for me to ignore Sunday morning World Vision commercials and so forth, but it is understandable to most people why I'd put the quality - of - living of my
nuclear family ahead of many
more strangers.
Yes, there are societal factors — working longer hours while wages have remained flat; raising kids at a distance from
nuclear families; technology providing an omnipresent distraction — that cumulatively have made it
more challenging to be a closely connected couple than ever before.
However, as
more and
more people became urbanized, a tendency that increased after 1994, the
nuclear family system started disintegrating.
This study also identified that adolescent students belonging to
nuclear families were
more prone to psychosocial dysfunction compared to the students from a non-
nuclear family structure (AOR = 3.60, 95 % CI = 1.32 — 9.83)(23, 24).
Teenagers in single - parent
families and in blended
families are 300 %
more likely to need psychological help within any given year than teens from intact,
nuclear families.
Distinctive among psychiatrists, Dr. Cohen works with individuals and couples in the context of their
nuclear and extended
family relationships in a process that can be
more timely and less costly than treatment with multiple individual therapists for multiple
family members.
We should situate fathers» effects in social and individual context, whereby (say) effects may be
more pronounced and important in isolated
nuclear families in low - fertility high social capital contexts, but less visible in extended
families with higher fertility and
more substitutable forms of childcare.
Barbara Mitchell, professor of Sociology & Gerontology at the Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C., says, «The norm in Canada has historically been small
nuclear households, but we're seeing a rise in multi-generational
families across cultural backgrounds and people are living long enough that we're seeing
more four - generation households.»