Sentences with phrase «more number of goals»

Not exact matches

Their goal was to make marginally more correct decisions than their competitors, in the long haul, and to do so they implemented an analytically rigorous system that not only processed all of the bleeding edge metrics they could find or create, but also heavily incorporated data from old fashioned sources: scouts, who could see things about a player's potential and character that numbers couldn't.

Selected companies gain exposure to a large number of investors from angel groups across the state who co-invest to meet the company's fundraising goals; the angel groups gain far more insights than they can generate on their own.

But I also believe that there are, or soon will be, a number of attractive alternatives out there — the JOBS Act modernized tried - and - true Regulation D and is intent on reviving Regulation A — that may provide a more efficient way of funding with your specific goals and prospects in mind.

More than 80 % of managers say that their goals are limited in number, specific, and measurable (Harvard Business Review).

Before we reach irreconcilable differences regarding what should be legal, our energies would be more productively spent on the common goal of reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies rather than fighting each other.

A lot more could have been done if Republicans had allowed for a simple majority vote, but... Remember the words of Senate Minority Leader McConnell, [My number one goal is to make sure Obama is a one term President.]

A number of folks on WW Connect (the only feature I like about the new program) recommended your blog; I am totally stoked to try some more of your recipes... goal here I come thank you, thank you, THANK YOU!!

«Our overall goal is to continue to uphold the type of products and service we are known for, and increase the number of employees and independent purveyors to serve even more areas of the country.

These numbers seem to change as limited editions come and go; we don't know if the new goal will translate to an amount that is more or less than the 80 % of Nespresso's total tonnage it is currently sourcing under the program.

The goal should be cutting down on the number of certificates required, not demanding more of them.

Did you know that the Flyers expected winning percentage declines in inverse correlation with the number of goals they trail, and that that relationship becomes more pronounced as the remaining time in each game decreases?

Any decent striker would easily have scored more than 25 league goals for Arsenal a season with the number of chances our midfield creates in every match.

Interesting to note that Arsenal have already won as many games as they did last year and scored more goals... for all this talk of needing a striker if you look at the number of goals we have conceded that is where it has been lost!

But as we grow more obsessed with reducing influence and the designation of greatness to goals and assists, after Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi destroyed the norms of those two stats, it is imperative to understand that he was more than those numbers.

When one analyzes the 4 games in which the team conceded three or more goals, a number of factors come into play: attacking players losing balls in our defensive third, attacking players not committing fouls when they lose the ball to stop counters, attacking players not tracking back to defend, and attacking players lacking a defensive mindset..

Sanchez partly addressed this issue as he does score a reasonable number of goals whilst welbeck was more of a prospect than a proven striker.

All the more impressive for the number of goals and games, Barcelona star Lionel Messi is top of another list as he holds a record of 0.81 goals per game in the Champions League, having scored 74 in just 91 appearances, including two in finals.

Chelsea have conceded 17 goals in Premier League action this season, only Sunderland have let in more, with Jose Mourinho opting more recently to use Gary Cahill and Kurt Zouma as his central defensive partnership, with captain John Terry having been dropped on a number of occasions.

It follows speculation linking the Blues with moves for Andy Carroll and Peter Crouch, as noted in the report, but given their respective goal tallies and number of appearances in recent times, it's quite the underwhelming shortlist of candidates to offer more firepower at Stamford Bridge.

More good work from Giroud really should have seen things leveled up in terms of numbers not just goals, and Eric Dier certainly should have been given a second yellow for a blatant shirt pull on the Arsenal forward.

The former Chelsea star has proven to be far more influential and important to Manuel Pellegrini's plans than had first been anticipated, with a number of trademark goals having helped City right back into a straight title duel with Lampard's former fans down at Stamford Bridge.

A twenty year old kid who has done nothing more than beat some opponents one on one and score a less than large number of goals versus a German world cup winner who sees passes very few players can see.

Barcelona boss Luis Enrique must be similarly concerned about his Nou Camp back - line after seeing the Catalan outfit fall to defeats at Celta Vigo and Sevilla in recent weeks and the La Liga title holders have conceded more than four times the number of goals Real Madrid have leaked.

Giroud is NOT in the top bracket of ST's capable of scoring 25 + goals in a season (his career numbers tell us as much no matter what criteria you omit) and, perhaps more crucially, engineering moments that can win games single - handedly.

If Walcott rests on his laurels at some stage, with a decent number of goals behind him, or takes next season more lightly, I'd want us to rip that contract to shreds.

I still choose goals over hold up play and I think given the same number of games Walcott scores more goals

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I think Giroud is more than capable of being Arsenal's Plan B in attack, he will get a fair number of goals, but as long as Alexis is on form, Giroud is not a starter for the Gunners.

We lost the balance of the team I could clearly see it there was something un clear to our players on the field the left wing was weak wellbeck lost position far too many times belerin was not up to scratch maybe it should have been gabrial instead of matasacker carzola tried to spray ball into left flank that went begging but also the midfield was weak perhaps there should have been 5 but the number wasn't the real problem we didn't do what the tots did to us all in all hope this was a good dress rehearsal for the champion league but the defence has to be more accurate to protect the goal keeper keans goals are not acceptable

Forwards — again numbers wise probably enough but I think we lack one more goal scorer I think only Alexis Giroud and Walcott if fit will offer more than 15 + goals in a season although the rest of the team will score many goals.

people are going on about the number of goals he scored or lack of them more precisely but morata for the majority of the season was used as an impact player / sub, also like the writer mentioned as both RM&JUVE he was overshadowed by great players / stars so if if he were to sign for us knowing that he is the 1st choice striker he could flourish and surprise us all!!

The Uruguay international has scored more goals (25 to 12), enjoyed a better shot accuracy (57 to 54 per cent) and a better conversion rate (28 to 16 per cent) from a higher number of shots per game (3.8 to 3).

pretty please, its true stats don't lie but it could be manipulated to tell different stories, the simple fact and bottoml line is Ozil created over 190 chances and ONLY 19 was put away by our misfiring duo of Giroud and Walcott, and the fact he had half of the season to match and eclipse the assist record and failed says more about Giroud's and Walcott woeful woeful finishing abilities and nought whatsoever to do with Ozil, am can only do so much, what's next, blame him for number of goals we conceded?

I will say it again Coquelin is the only true DM arsenal has, Chambers can be converted into a DM also, which i feel would be his most suited position, Xhaka is not really a DM but more a deep lying playmaker with some defensive qualities, cazorla also has that trait, Ramsay, Iwobi and wilshere are actually want to be number 10s, who are considered box to box midfielders but both lack the defensive discilpline, Elneny is our only box to box midfielder who is very disciplined and Ozil our number 10 who although provides a lot of assist does not provide a goal treat.

The second - half was much more even, after England had marched into the dressing - room at half - time a goal down, but, with Wayne Rooney missing a number of good chances it seemed the equaliser might elude Roy Hodgson's side.

They have a number of promising young centre backs who ought to be given an opportunity to prove themselves for the remainder of the season in the EPL matches.They simply can not be worse than the rapidly declining Koscielny and Mustafi who can not cope with the likes of Swansea, Bournemouth etc. let alone a team like Spurs.The lack of steel at the back impacts on our more attacking players as they know they need to score 2/3 goals to have any chance of producing a win.As usual Elneny has come in for criticism but the real culprits are our centre backs and Xhaka who seems to be a fixture regardless of being bang average.

I think everyone knows that both Theo and Giroud will net a good return of goals, the problem is more specifically when he scores and the number of chances he misses.

Still only 20 years old, the Croatian has made 12 starts in Serie A this season, contributing two goals and one assist, showing himself capable of playing in a number of different midfield roles, either as a deep - lying playmaker or a more advanced role, and even wide on the left hand side.

This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.

Exactly my thought as well, we should have played our usual 4 — 2 — 3 — 1 with Ramsey as number 10 rather than trying to feet in both Theo and Ox though I would start with Theo as he is more of a goal threat.

It is slightly reassuring that his assist numbers have gone up despite goal scoring going down, which may be indicative that he has the ability to adapt to a new role and focus more on feeding the likes of Ramirez, Danladi, and Toye.

The goal production rates of Giroud and Costa were actually very close (goals + assists per minutes played)-- Costa was not injured and played more minutes so he produced more in total numbers.

your justification of his finishing is down to his numbers 9 goals welbeck shot accyracy was 56 % last season the same as rooney and more than rvp and giroud whos shot accuracy was in the mid 40 «s

But apart from the fans, a number of former stars have also expressed their discontent over the regime, none more so than the Gunners» second - highest goal - scorer, Ian Wright, who claims that he would like to help the club «at any capacity» but Wenger won't let him.

You can't really give a centre - back much more than this when you concede three goals, but Mertesacker made a huge number of great headed clearances throughout the game.

The football itself probably helped: Lukaku finished the season with more goals, 26 to 22; Chelsea fans were able to take consolation from Morata's higher number of assists.

The two have scored the same number of EPL goals as well, so it seems a bit odd and more than a little unfair that De Bruyne is being praised to the high hills while the Arsenal man gets nothing but slagged off.

«I thought in the second half they always looked dangerous against Bournemouth and capable of scoring — it is true that if you look at the number of goals they scored and the quality of their last two performances, it looks like they are coming back to a much more dangerous team.»

Only Real Madrid's Cristiano Ronaldo (48) and Barcelona's Lionel Messi (43) scored more than Lacazette's 27 goals last season — making it little wonder that he has caught the eye of a number of European giants.

Their forward line looks capable of scoring lots of goals and they have scored most goals in the PL so far (37 goals so far) and that is 10 goals more than Arsenal who have scored the second highest number.