Not exact matches
«electronic format is much
more versatile (read on virtually any device)» - isn't this a bit
of a
strawman once we consider that the alternative to «virtually any device will do» is «no device is required in the first place»?
This doesn't mean that regulators should never close a school or should ignore test results (both
of which are
strawman arguments), but they should be significantly
more humble about what they really know about school quality.
Someone writes a guest post on RC and then for eternity it's a done deal and assumed «true» when it was little
more than egregious incompetent SPIN
more worthy
of a biased politician than a couple
of biased scientists obviously incapable
of thinking holistically and unable to stop creating fraudulent
Strawmen arguments out
of thin air trying to prove they are «right» and the other is «wrong».
Latimer, you have no excuse to keep dwelling on the terminology, and I have already posted cites that say changing the pH far less than the
strawman point
of a pH
of 7 is bad, but here's
more.
«Willis builds a
strawman Willis makes a logical fallacy known as the
strawman fallacy here, when he says: The current climate paradigm says that the surface air temperature is a linear function
of the «forcing»... Change in Temperature (∆ T) = Change in Forcing (∆ F) times Climate Sensitivity What he seems to have done is taking an equation relating to a simple energy balance model (probably from this Wikipedia entry) and applied it to the much
more complex climate system.
So if you are losing the science and policy wars, create a
strawman of an entity that can be
more easily made into a charicature (sp?).
So please, no
more of that timewasting
strawman.
Though that is
more a philosophical than a practically useful statement, and it's not the same as claiming that «AGW caused this», which many
of Gleick's opponents are arguing against (i.e.
strawman).
The suggestion that scientists were in it to get rich would have to be one
of the
more amusing
strawman arguments seen in this debate.
So even if my reading is the «
strawman» reading and yours is «the one true reading», this would still tell us something about whether attempts to persuade in that matter are
more likely to influence the target
of the communication to take an open minded view on evidence or
more likely to influence them in the other direction.
, quotes out
of context, repeating the same tired debunked arguments year after year... The only difference is that the ideology behind it is a little
more popular — the
strawman liberal is apparently a
more plausible villain to most people than the
strawman atheist.
Curry might say something about the» 76 - ’78 warm phase, but either climate sensitivity is no
more her expertise than many amateur bloggers or she is intentionally muddying the waters with a long screed about Balmaseda reanalysis and attacking the
strawman of «hiatus = missing heat».
I will say though, on further thought, that what particularly annoyed me about Alex's piece was that he presented such a cartoonish
strawman as the position
of the Canadian government and,
more generally, Israel's defenders.