Sentences with phrase «more of tax payers»

This means, unfortunately, there is likely to be millions more of tax payers money that's been inappropriately spent.

Not exact matches

Of course, these various rates mean individual tax payers could end up paying more or less.
Though only a small percentage of taxpayers have such high incomes, research suggests that high - income tax payers are more responsive to tax reforms that affect charitable giving because they have more income, more tax advisers, and more incentive to devote time to figuring out the after - tax price of giving.
It makes some crimes legal, and then harshly punishes other crimes, and then does nothing to help those who have been judged guilty, and in the process of trying to help them, only robs the tax payers of more money.
If just half of that was spent on rehabilitation instead of just churning out more hardened criminals I believe the incarceration numbers would plummet which would be great for the tax payers but terrible for the investors and owners of the private prisons.
I would argue that there is no moral principle that say I should have to be taxed more (of my hard earned and well saved / spent dollars) to support idiots who think they can spend spend spend and let good ole» uncle sam and the other hard working tax payers bail them out!
Tyner called for a «living minimum wage» that would rise to $ 15 an hour by 2020 for companies employing 500 people or more; single - payer health care in New York state; a tax system that would reduce the burden of school taxes on property owners; and the legalization of small amounts of recreational marijuana for adults.
Sitting at a meeting with one or more of them is excruciating to see the utter waste of tax payer $ on people and projects totally disconnected from any real community initiative.
«People who are very wealthy, particularly payers of capital gains tax, people on very high incomes who get substantial income relief under the income tax system should pay more, in order that poorer people and indeed people on middle incomes are lifted out of tax altogether.»
It is worth noting that while people under age 65 in the U.S. live in a heavily market - dominated economy where poor employment outcomes mean poverty and a lack of access to health care, almost everyone over age 65 has most of their healthcare paid for by Medicare, (a FICA tax financed, single payer system that pays providers more or less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost controls), more than half of their nursing home costs paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it pays providers and moderately means tested), and receives enough of a guaranteed income from the combination of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings of their own), above the poverty line, regardless of the state of the local economy.
«It can not be considered efficient if the Coalition Government writes off more than # 160 million of tax payers» money and yet, at the same time, persists with a policy of creating academies and free schools that are both expensive and unwanted by the public.
«Sadly, he seems oblivious to the state of affairs evidenced by his cynical efforts to give away even more tax payer dollars hobnobbing in Harvey Weinstein's Hollywood.»
It's also worth noting that a rainbow coalition held together by the SNP and Plaid votes would probably get English people (who consistently vote Tory on average) angry enough to leave the union... as things are, I think it is the case that there is more support for Scottish independence in England than there is in Scotland, partly because of the West Lothian question, partly because the Barret formula is (rightly) seen as subsidizing the Scots with (quite a lot of) English tax payers cash...
The expansion of this bill will ensure that tax payer subsidized developments work for even more New Yorkers and we applaudMayor de Blasio for it.
Progressive Taxes and Revenue Sharing to end the fiscal crises of our local governments and schools, Tuition - Free Public Colleges and Universities, Single Payer Health Care, $ 15 Minimum Wage, Public Banking, Union Co-ops, a Ban on Fracking, a Climate Acton Program scaled up to meet the crisis, and more.
That return underlines what incredible value the Foundation delivers for the tax payer, all the more remarkable when compared to other countries where all the costs of improving school sports facilities have to come from the public purse.
Because of the new federal relief which allows the $ 10,000 deduction, however, this option is likely to be much more attractive to tax payers, causing states to lose a portion of their taxable base.
Now I understand that it would be bad business to highlight the weaknesses of the organization, but if what's good for TFA is bad for the country's education system then it is quite irresponsible for TFA not to give the whole story so legislators can make informed decisions about, for example, whether or not to spend millions of dollars of tax payer money to bring more TFAers to their districts.
when I mentioned school admin which wanted more money, I did not mean that they fight for the money that students deserve — I meant, that they want a piece of the consulting dollars, the technology funds, and all the stuff people like Adamowski and Pryor waste tax payer funds on — MassInsight, Edupioneers, TFA, the so - called extended day evaporating dollars, etc..
While executives from the magazine's staff made glorious claims that having this oversized debt simply wiped clean will allow them to continue to publish, there has not been much mention of how this will benefit tax payers and consumers, let alone avid readers of the magazine's 49 monthly international editions and some twenty more related titles.
The savings to tax payers alone as schools transition to digital — especially in communities which leverage students» own device purchases in order to avoid buying and insuring costly hardware — should serve as enough of an incentive to help foster more deals of this kind.
The insurance premium will increase and it seems the US govt is unable to bear the burden due to its deficit, so more of the burden will be pushed to the tax payers.
However other countries spend even more tax payer money on fossil fuel subsidies of various forms, including subsidising producers, tax credits, and keeping petrol artificially cheap.
A lot more money, flowing from the political favors of tax - payer subsidized renewable energy into the pockets of billionaires, plus getting politicians to impose new environmental rules on fossil fuels and nuclear to make them wildly more expensive and billionaire renewable interests more competitive.
Moreover, even those programs that have been implemented as claimed have, for the most part, proved singularly ineffective, especially the much - touted Greenhouse Challenge Program which, in the end, is little more than a tax - payer funded PR exercise for some of Australia's biggest emitters.
Instead of taking the well documented failures and discrepancies as a starting point for an outside review, the BOM basically tells the Australian tax payer to eff - off and self audits, fibbing even more.
The net result of all these tactics is that ratepayers and tax payers are more likely to pay dearly in terms of increasing rates for electricity and decreasing electric reliability since each month will bring further EPA efforts to force states to build «renewable» sources of electric power.
Because he has put a bunch of climate skeptics into the EPA and they would rather you use MORE energy, and have tax payers spend MORE money.
The government's own (long - awaited) review of the taxation of non-domiciled tax payers was hurriedly brought to a conclusion and a useful, but more modest, change to the nil rate band was introduced.
The slashes to auto insurance coverage in the 2015 budget can only be seen as a step closer to public auto insurance when with every cost saving solution the IBC comes up with in order to curtail claims means the unsuspecting tax - payer will pay more of the costs for victims through our publicly funded programs.
It is also important to keep in mind that all visitors entering the U.S. are required to undergo a security screening by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), and because they want to be confident in the fact that travelers won't leave behind hefty bill for U.S. tax payers to have to cover upon their return to their home country, the question of whether you are protected by a travel insurance policy or not may arise, especially for elderly citizens who are more likely to encounter a medical emergency during the duration of their stay.
For those tax payer individuals who are of age 60 or more and are also paying medical insurance premium for their parents, the maximum tax benefit under section 80D would therefore be a total of Rs 60,000
There is an additional tool that tax payers can make use of under Section 10 in order to be able to save more money on tax payments at the financial year end.
The rush to the bottom of the Realtor well of irrelevancy is well underway (pun intended) thanks to what I label as the unrecognized psychology of the self - serving communal thinking practices of Organized Real Estate top level comfortably - salaried bureaucrats (not the here today, gone next year regularly turned over faux president puppets), who, because they are in perpetual positions of conflict of interest (more dues from more registrants equals more money for their in - house empires, which thus creates more guaranteed money for them personally and thence for their underling cronies which in turn leads to a solidification of their own top jobs as well as for their underlings» jobs over whom «they» need to be seen as being in control of... which is as usual job one) do what is best for themselves first, in order to avoid becoming being viewed as being redundant in the eyes of their tax - payers... the one - hundred thousand plus Canada - wide money - supplying whether - they - know - what - they - are - doing - or - not registrants.
During your second quarter of Economics 101, you will learn that the Private Sector will create MORE jobs with a given amount of money than the government will, thus creating more income tax payMORE jobs with a given amount of money than the government will, thus creating more income tax paymore income tax payers.
Single taxpayers, on the other hand, would see a tax benefit of more than $ 600 over the standard deduction (for $ 7K in interest expense), although the net tax savings would only be about $ 150 for a payer in the 25 percent tax bracket.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z