This means, unfortunately, there is likely to be millions
more of tax payers money that's been inappropriately spent.
Not exact matches
Of course, these various rates mean individual
tax payers could end up paying
more or less.
Though only a small percentage
of taxpayers have such high incomes, research suggests that high - income
tax payers are
more responsive to
tax reforms that affect charitable giving because they have
more income,
more tax advisers, and
more incentive to devote time to figuring out the after -
tax price
of giving.
It makes some crimes legal, and then harshly punishes other crimes, and then does nothing to help those who have been judged guilty, and in the process
of trying to help them, only robs the
tax payers of more money.
If just half
of that was spent on rehabilitation instead
of just churning out
more hardened criminals I believe the incarceration numbers would plummet which would be great for the
tax payers but terrible for the investors and owners
of the private prisons.
I would argue that there is no moral principle that say I should have to be
taxed more (
of my hard earned and well saved / spent dollars) to support idiots who think they can spend spend spend and let good ole» uncle sam and the other hard working
tax payers bail them out!
Tyner called for a «living minimum wage» that would rise to $ 15 an hour by 2020 for companies employing 500 people or
more; single -
payer health care in New York state; a
tax system that would reduce the burden
of school
taxes on property owners; and the legalization
of small amounts
of recreational marijuana for adults.
Sitting at a meeting with one or
more of them is excruciating to see the utter waste
of tax payer $ on people and projects totally disconnected from any real community initiative.
«People who are very wealthy, particularly
payers of capital gains
tax, people on very high incomes who get substantial income relief under the income
tax system should pay
more, in order that poorer people and indeed people on middle incomes are lifted out
of tax altogether.»
It is worth noting that while people under age 65 in the U.S. live in a heavily market - dominated economy where poor employment outcomes mean poverty and a lack
of access to health care, almost everyone over age 65 has most
of their healthcare paid for by Medicare, (a FICA
tax financed, single
payer system that pays providers
more or less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost controls),
more than half
of their nursing home costs paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it pays providers and moderately means tested), and receives enough
of a guaranteed income from the combination
of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings
of their own), above the poverty line, regardless
of the state
of the local economy.
«It can not be considered efficient if the Coalition Government writes off
more than # 160 million
of tax payers» money and yet, at the same time, persists with a policy
of creating academies and free schools that are both expensive and unwanted by the public.
«Sadly, he seems oblivious to the state
of affairs evidenced by his cynical efforts to give away even
more tax payer dollars hobnobbing in Harvey Weinstein's Hollywood.»
It's also worth noting that a rainbow coalition held together by the SNP and Plaid votes would probably get English people (who consistently vote Tory on average) angry enough to leave the union... as things are, I think it is the case that there is
more support for Scottish independence in England than there is in Scotland, partly because
of the West Lothian question, partly because the Barret formula is (rightly) seen as subsidizing the Scots with (quite a lot
of) English
tax payers cash...
The expansion
of this bill will ensure that
tax payer subsidized developments work for even
more New Yorkers and we applaudMayor de Blasio for it.
Progressive
Taxes and Revenue Sharing to end the fiscal crises
of our local governments and schools, Tuition - Free Public Colleges and Universities, Single
Payer Health Care, $ 15 Minimum Wage, Public Banking, Union Co-ops, a Ban on Fracking, a Climate Acton Program scaled up to meet the crisis, and
more.
That return underlines what incredible value the Foundation delivers for the
tax payer, all the
more remarkable when compared to other countries where all the costs
of improving school sports facilities have to come from the public purse.
Because
of the new federal relief which allows the $ 10,000 deduction, however, this option is likely to be much
more attractive to
tax payers, causing states to lose a portion
of their taxable base.
Now I understand that it would be bad business to highlight the weaknesses
of the organization, but if what's good for TFA is bad for the country's education system then it is quite irresponsible for TFA not to give the whole story so legislators can make informed decisions about, for example, whether or not to spend millions
of dollars
of tax payer money to bring
more TFAers to their districts.
when I mentioned school admin which wanted
more money, I did not mean that they fight for the money that students deserve — I meant, that they want a piece
of the consulting dollars, the technology funds, and all the stuff people like Adamowski and Pryor waste
tax payer funds on — MassInsight, Edupioneers, TFA, the so - called extended day evaporating dollars, etc..
While executives from the magazine's staff made glorious claims that having this oversized debt simply wiped clean will allow them to continue to publish, there has not been much mention
of how this will benefit
tax payers and consumers, let alone avid readers
of the magazine's 49 monthly international editions and some twenty
more related titles.
The savings to
tax payers alone as schools transition to digital — especially in communities which leverage students» own device purchases in order to avoid buying and insuring costly hardware — should serve as enough
of an incentive to help foster
more deals
of this kind.
The insurance premium will increase and it seems the US govt is unable to bear the burden due to its deficit, so
more of the burden will be pushed to the
tax payers.
However other countries spend even
more tax payer money on fossil fuel subsidies
of various forms, including subsidising producers,
tax credits, and keeping petrol artificially cheap.
A lot
more money, flowing from the political favors
of tax -
payer subsidized renewable energy into the pockets
of billionaires, plus getting politicians to impose new environmental rules on fossil fuels and nuclear to make them wildly
more expensive and billionaire renewable interests
more competitive.
Moreover, even those programs that have been implemented as claimed have, for the most part, proved singularly ineffective, especially the much - touted Greenhouse Challenge Program which, in the end, is little
more than a
tax -
payer funded PR exercise for some
of Australia's biggest emitters.
Instead
of taking the well documented failures and discrepancies as a starting point for an outside review, the BOM basically tells the Australian
tax payer to eff - off and self audits, fibbing even
more.
The net result
of all these tactics is that ratepayers and
tax payers are
more likely to pay dearly in terms
of increasing rates for electricity and decreasing electric reliability since each month will bring further EPA efforts to force states to build «renewable» sources
of electric power.
Because he has put a bunch
of climate skeptics into the EPA and they would rather you use
MORE energy, and have
tax payers spend
MORE money.
The government's own (long - awaited) review
of the taxation
of non-domiciled
tax payers was hurriedly brought to a conclusion and a useful, but
more modest, change to the nil rate band was introduced.
The slashes to auto insurance coverage in the 2015 budget can only be seen as a step closer to public auto insurance when with every cost saving solution the IBC comes up with in order to curtail claims means the unsuspecting
tax -
payer will pay
more of the costs for victims through our publicly funded programs.
It is also important to keep in mind that all visitors entering the U.S. are required to undergo a security screening by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), and because they want to be confident in the fact that travelers won't leave behind hefty bill for U.S.
tax payers to have to cover upon their return to their home country, the question
of whether you are protected by a travel insurance policy or not may arise, especially for elderly citizens who are
more likely to encounter a medical emergency during the duration
of their stay.
For those
tax payer individuals who are
of age 60 or
more and are also paying medical insurance premium for their parents, the maximum
tax benefit under section 80D would therefore be a total
of Rs 60,000
There is an additional tool that
tax payers can make use
of under Section 10 in order to be able to save
more money on
tax payments at the financial year end.
The rush to the bottom
of the Realtor well
of irrelevancy is well underway (pun intended) thanks to what I label as the unrecognized psychology
of the self - serving communal thinking practices
of Organized Real Estate top level comfortably - salaried bureaucrats (not the here today, gone next year regularly turned over faux president puppets), who, because they are in perpetual positions
of conflict
of interest (
more dues from
more registrants equals
more money for their in - house empires, which thus creates
more guaranteed money for them personally and thence for their underling cronies which in turn leads to a solidification
of their own top jobs as well as for their underlings» jobs over whom «they» need to be seen as being in control
of... which is as usual job one) do what is best for themselves first, in order to avoid becoming being viewed as being redundant in the eyes
of their
tax -
payers... the one - hundred thousand plus Canada - wide money - supplying whether - they - know - what - they - are - doing - or - not registrants.
During your second quarter
of Economics 101, you will learn that the Private Sector will create
MORE jobs with a given amount of money than the government will, thus creating more income tax pay
MORE jobs with a given amount
of money than the government will, thus creating
more income tax pay
more income
tax payers.
Single taxpayers, on the other hand, would see a
tax benefit
of more than $ 600 over the standard deduction (for $ 7K in interest expense), although the net
tax savings would only be about $ 150 for a
payer in the 25 percent
tax bracket.