For
more on both sides of the discussion, see this review of the book.
Not exact matches
I was happily lurking here but as the
discussion begins to get
more heated I thought I'd just chime in for a little thought: I think there are basically very sensible people
on both
sides of the
discussion here and I think there's a lot
of potential to learn from each other.
I have been to both
sides in 58 years, did my studies, questioned over and over, held
discussions, talked to heads
of church, made a choice... I am not spending one
more second
on Religion!!!
It may seem like a simple question but it is not — after a bit
of a
side tangent
discussion on Dianne Jacob's recent post about recipe adaptions, I decided that this topic needed a bit
more attention.
The
discussion here has been very instructive and I can actually see valid points
on both
sides of the issue (less government vs.
more government intervention) when talking about children's nutrition at school.
Via e-mails, a
side discussion developed
on the issue
of whether the U.S. government should do
more to regulate non-CO2 greenhouse gases, begun by Michael MacCracken
of the Climate Institute in Washington, D.C.:
There are theoretically
more complex strategies and products
on both
sides of this debate, but both practically and for policy purposes, an empirical investigation into the basic choices is an excellent starting point for
discussion.
al as I see the
discussions about it as petty squabbling and as just
more of the same ol same ol identity politics
on both
sides.
On the official side, minor steps were made towards more emission reductions, including the agreement of a second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, continuation of climate finance and initiation of a discussion on raising the ambition level before 202
On the official
side, minor steps were made towards
more emission reductions, including the agreement
of a second commitment period
of the Kyoto Protocol, continuation
of climate finance and initiation
of a
discussion on raising the ambition level before 202
on raising the ambition level before 2020.
The National Association
of Scholars does not take a position
on global warming but advocates for a full
discussion of all
sides of the controversy.To learn
more about NAS, visit www.nas.org.
On the technical
side, the severe limitations
of GCMs, and the modest amount
of historical data we have, provide reasons enough for wanting
more discussion.
It's currently the subject
of a great deal
of discussion among smartphone fans, in a stand - off that has «it's terrible for an # 800 phone»
on one
side to «you probably... Read
more