Sentences with phrase «more on product liability»

(For more on product liability, you may enjoy Injury Claim Coach's article What You Need to Know about Establishing a Product Liability Case)

Not exact matches

A: There is a possibility of combining social - based or emotionally based torts with more traditional product liability theory — something that creators might want to keep an eye on.

The country's future implicit liabilities, such as spending on Social Security and Medicare, are expected to increase from the current level of 10 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) to more than 16 percent of GDP in 2037, and will reach 25 percent of GDP by 2085, according to the Congressional Budget Office's 2012 long - term budget outlook.

Where road accidents used to be on the driver of the car, it seems that driverless cars are more of a product liability question.

Second, and most important, motor vehicle litigation will move from a system where accidents are assessed based on driver negligence to a products liability system, where manufacturers bear more of the burden for failure of things such as sensors and warning systems.

Also, be sure to check out FindLaw's information on recalls and products liability for more information.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission reports that more than $ 700 billion annually is spent on deaths, injuries and property damage resulting from product liability accidents in thProduct Safety Commission reports that more than $ 700 billion annually is spent on deaths, injuries and property damage resulting from product liability accidents in thproduct liability accidents in the U.S..

Indiana Federal Court Dismisses Products Liability Claim by Worker Whose Shirt Caught Fire, Allows Negligence Claim to Proceed: Hathaway v. Cintas Corporate Services, Inc., Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, November 30, 2012 Appellate Court Overturns Worker's $ 30 Million Verdict in Claim for Chemical Exposure: Solis v. BASF Corporation, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, November 9, 2012 More Than Forty People in Indiana Sickened in Fungal Meningitis Outbreak; State Seeks to Revoke License of Pharmacy Where Outbreak Allegedly Originated, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, October 31, 2012 Photo credit: «energizing drink» by lusi on stock.xchng.

A personal injury lawyer at the firm's headquarters in Austin, Branson focuses his practice on cases involving automobile collisions, product injuries, dog bites, premises liability, and more.

With more than 35 years of jury trial, product liability, and insurance litigation experience, David focuses his practice on the defense of domestic and international manufacturers of consumer and industrial products.

Dedicated to fighting for others, she focuses her practice on traumatic brain injury, automobile collisions, dog bites, product injury, premises liability, and more.

He has since proven himself a leader on our personal injury team, focusing his practice on cases involving catastrophic personal injury, wrongful death, automobile and trucking accidents, premises liability, product injury, and more.

For more information on product liability or recall cases, browse through the Related Resources links below.

To learn more about dangerous products and product liability against manufacturers, consult with a PA personal injury lawyer who can offer legal advice on a particular issue.

Written by John A. Day, Civil Trial Specialist, 2012 Best Lawyers Bet - the - Company Litigation Lawyer of the Year for Nashville and 2012 Best Lawyers in America listed in Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Products Liability, Commercial and Bet - the - Company Litigation, Day on Torts identifies more than 300 Tennessee tort law subjects and provides summary of the leading case on each subject to give you a quick, readable synopsis of current state of the law.

More Than Forty People in Indiana Sickened in Fungal Meningitis Outbreak; State Seeks to Revoke License of Pharmacy Where Outbreak Allegedly Originated, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, October 31, 2012 Federal Statute Preempts State Products Liability Lawsuit Over Asbestos Exposure, According to Supreme Court: Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp., Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, October 18, 2012 Spinal Fractures, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Other Risks Posed by Trampolines, According to Pediatricians, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, October 12, 2012 Photo credit: «Yummy popcorn» by shannahsin on stock.xchng.

On its face, this looks like a case of the casino being a sore loser, but look closer and it is more like an enormous product liability case.

Many members of this group have earned national recognition for their product liability work, which has included representing manufacturers at trial and / or on appeal in more than 30 states.

In drug and device product liability litigation, discovery burdens are unequal and fall more heavily on defendants, and there is no reason to think that will change under the MIDPP.

Among our hundreds of posts, more than a handful touch on Drug & Device Law in that they (1) involve cases with our clients» products far from product liability or (2) involve issues we see in our cases being presented in very different types of cases.

(1) extending negligent misrepresentation beyond «business transactions» to product liability, unprecedented in Texas; (2) ignoring multiple US Supreme Court decisions that express and implied preemption operate independently (as discussed here) to dismiss implied preemption with nothing more than a cite to the Medtronic v. Lohr express preemption decision; (3) inventing some sort of state - law tort to second - guess the defendant following one FDA marketing approach (§ 510k clearance) over another (pre-market approval), unprecedented anywhere; (4) holding that the learned intermediary rule does not apply whenever a defendant «compensates» or «incentivizes» physicians to use its products, absent any Texas state or appellate authority; (5) imposing strict liability on an entity not in the product's chain of sale, contrary to Texas statute (§ 82.001 (2)-RRB-; (6) creating a claim for «tortious interference» with the physician - patient relationship, again utterly unprecedented; (7) creating «vicarious» breach of fiduciary duty for engaging doctors to serve as expert witnesses in mass tort litigation also involving their patients, ditto; and (8) construing a consulting agreement with a physician as «commercial bribery» to avoid the Texas cap on punitive damages, jaw - droppingly unprecedented.

Based in Annapolis, Maryland, our law practice primarily focuses on professional liability litigation, product liability litigation, environmental litigation and all aspects of civil and criminal defense litigation, and many more.