This was the conclusion of a scientific paper I co-authored last year, in which our team found
more overall global warming (of the oceans, air, land, and ice combined) over the past 15 years than during the prior 15 years.
Not exact matches
Overall, the group is pressing for final passage of climate legislation during this Congress because delays will make it
more difficult to avoid the most severe effects of
global warming.
Their findings indicated that,
overall, the contribution of changing solar activity, either directly or through cosmic rays, was even less and can not have contributed
more than 10 percent to
global warming in the 20th century.
The
overall picture is indisputable:
global temperature maps show far
more areas are
warming than cooling.
The cold air outbreak of the next few days is nothing unusual, and neither inconsistent with an
overall picture of a
warming world, nor evidence that
global warming is making cold weather
more extreme.
Overall, our results would suggest that people want
more emphasis placed on
global warming — on average, about two - thirds of a point
more.
Much of what they said meshed with the
overall theme of the meeting, which organizers said was aimed at proving that the recent consensus on dangerous human - caused
global warming was shaped
more by politics and passion than data.
For a long time there's been a strong perception among those of us tracking research on human - caused
global warming that meteorologists are
more apt to doubt that humans could dangerously disrupt climate than the much smaller community of climatologists studying the
overall climate system and what influences its patterns.
bozzza - The differences in the Arctic are perhaps 1/4 the ocean thermal mass as
global ocean averages, small
overall size (the smallest ocean), being almost surrounded by land (which
warms faster),
more limited liquid interchanges due to bottlenecking than the Antarctic, and very importantly considerable susceptibility to positive albedo feedbacks; as less summer ice is present given current trends, solar energy absorbed by the Arctic ocean goes up very rapidly.
It would be
more accurate to say that
global surface air
warming has slowed, but the
overall warming of the Earth's climate has sped up.
Yahoo News — February 18, 2013 AP By SETH BORENSTEIN
Global warming could lead to
more blizzards but less
overall snow.
Brazil, for example, has reduced its deforestation - related emissions by two - thirds in just six years, and Indonesia, a large emitter of
global warming pollution because of high rates of deforestation, has pledged to cut
overall emissions by
more than 25 percent by 2020.
Defines «reporting entity» to mean: (1) a covered entity; (2) an entity that would be covered if it had emitted, produced, imported, manufactured, or delivered in 2008 or any subsequent year
more than the applicable threshold level of carbon dioxide; (3) other entities that EPA determines will help achieve
overall goals of reducing
global warming pollution; (4) any vehicle fleet with emissions of
more than 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent on an annual basis, if its inclusion will help achieve such reduction; (5) any entity that delivers electricity to a facility in an energy - intensive industrial sector that meets the energy or GHG intensity criteria.
Apart from driving temperatures up,
global warming is likely to cause bigger,
more destructive storms, leading to an
overall increase in precipitation.
While some austerity mongers, like David Cameron in Britain, claim to care about
global warming and may believe that the fictional shortage of government money he promotes is a stand - in for the real shortage of atmospheric assets of the earth, the
overall effect of austerity is to, as with neoliberalism
more generally, to undermine the critically important instrument of government at exactly the time when it is needed most.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans
warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is
more difficult both to
warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and
more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water
warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse
global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands»
warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters
warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a
global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the
global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small
warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then
more buildings and
more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very
warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and
overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small
global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
-- Muller believes humans are changing climate with CO2 emissions — humans have been responsible for «most» of a 0.4 C
warming since 1957, almost none of the
warming before then — IPCC is in trouble due to sloppy science, exaggerated predictions; chairman will have to resign — the «Climategate» mails were not «hacked» — they were «leaked» by an insider — due to «hide the decline» deception, Muller will not read any future papers by Michael Mann — there has been no increase in hurricanes or tornadoes due to
global warming — automobiles are insignificant in
overall picture — China is the major CO2 producer, considerably
more than USA today — # 1 priority for China is growth of economy —
global warming is not considered important — China CO2 efficiency (GDP per ton CO2) is around one - fourth of USA today, has much room for improvement — China growth will make per capita CO2 emissions at same level as USA today by year 2040 — if it is «not profitable» it is «not sustainable» — US energy future depends on shale gas for automobiles; hydrogen will not be a factor — nor will electric cars, due to high cost — Muller is upbeat on nuclear (this was recorded pre-Fukushima)-- there has been no
warming in the USA — Muller was not convinced of Hansen's GISS temperature record; hopes BEST will provide a better record.
There are two primary externalities that result from our emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere — 1) an enhancement of the greenhouse effect, which results in an alteration of the energy flow in the earth's climate and a general tendency to
warm the
global average surface temperature, and 2) an enhancement of the rate of photosynthesis in plants and a general tendency to result in
more efficient growth and an
overall healthier condition of vegetation (including crops).
The results here reveal a larger picture — that the western tropical Indian Ocean has been
warming for
more than a century, at a rate faster than any other region of the tropical oceans, and turns out to be the largest contributor to the
overall trend in the
global mean sea surface temperature (SST)»
Note that regional proxies, such as the oxygen - isotope temperature reconstructions from the Greenland Ice Core Project that record Dansgaard - Oeschger events, often indicate faster regional rates of climate change than the
overall global average for glacial - interglacial transitions, just as today
warming is
more pronounced in Arctic regions than in equatorial regions (Barnosky et al., 2003; Diffenbaugh and Field, 2013).
So with climate change /
global warming, we will still experience
more warming overall, leading to an increase in heat extremes.
Given there is much
more water vapour in the lower levels of the atmosphere, the study really found that there was a decline in
overall global relative humidity when
global warming theory suggests it should stay
more - or-less stable.
I am aware of people making the argument that the big push by the nuclear industry for enormous government subsidies to find a massive expansion of nuclear power on the basis that nuclear power is «THE ANSWER» to
global warming is a fraud that dishonestly and cynically takes advantage of growing concern about the very real problem of
global warming, and I make that argument myself (because even a quite large expansion of nuclear electricity generation would have little effect on
overall GHG emissions, at great cost, taking too long to achieve even that little effect, while misdirecting resources that could
more effectively be applied elsewhere).
As the air gets
warmer it can hold
more water vapour, meaning that scientists expect
global warming to be accompanied by wetter conditions
overall.
Logic says that with
more water evaporated, while
global warming may cause now local draughts,
overall rainfall should increase.