«If left unregulated, rocket launches by the year 2050 could result in
more ozone destruction than was ever realized by CFCs.»
Due to the temperature dependence on the rates of chemical reactions involving ozone, cooler temperatures also lead to
more ozone destruction.
Not exact matches
Sunshine in the southern spring and summer creates even
more ozone - depleting gases, leading to the massive
destruction of up to 65 percent of the
ozone layer.
«
More specifically, different colors (or wavelengths) of ultraviolet light can affect oxygen and
ozone production and
destruction in different ways.»
An example of this kind of surprise happened in relation to the Antarctic
ozone hole, where unexpected chemistry on surfaces of ice particles lead to much
more efficient
destruction of
ozone in the polar vortex than had been expected, making an existing concern into a serious problem.
In colder years,
more ice particles will freeze, allowing
more chemical
destruction of the
ozone layer.
Effectively she appears to at least confirm the possibility of my proposition that what is going on is an entirely natural solar induced process (
destruction of
ozone in the upper atmosphere by
more incoming solar protons) which casts doubt on all previous assumptions concerning human CO2 AND CFCs.
I'm not ready to formally propose anything at this point but what if an active sun energises the
ozone destruction processes
more than it energises the
ozone creation processes?
In view of the doubts about the
ozone destruction process expressed by Signe we should ignore the temperature consequences of
more or less
ozone for the moment.