Sentences with phrase «more pacey»

«The more I explored it,» he said, «the more this pacey tale of high - tech hackers turned into a critique of crowdsourcing itself.»

The Red Devils may also need another, more pacey option in attack as Falcao has failed to deliver in a United shirt.

I would go for a more pacey attack, one to get in behind City's defence and open them up with quick passing and clever movement, that's their weakness — I'd start Alexis as striker.

Not exact matches

There is still a way for them both to play but it is more unlikely that Wenger will change the formation, with the squad that Arsenal have I do feel we could play 4 -4-2 diamond and the 2 man CF made up of a tall strong CF (Giroud / Welbeck) and a pacey off the last man shoulder type of CF (Theo / Alexis).

By observation we need pacey players on each flank, cazorla does not work in these situation on the flank and he always wonder inwards which crowds this area, playing him behind the striker would be more his thing.

If his finishing had been up to his normal standards, we could be discussing a brace or more from the pacey forward.

Ok can this side work against chelsea, i think it can but i would be a little more defensive in the middle, by taking out ozil and pushing cazorla behind the striker and add Hayden / Coquelin beside Flamini, we can carry on Ozil in the last 20 minutes, Chelsea defensive players hates a pacey forward line, so they will be committing lot of fouls and their backs will be occupied.

with this dynamic midfield and our pacey new welbeck, ozil has much more options which pays off for everyone.

I think that Cazorla has much more to provide for us, so I think that just a pacey right side will be enough to do the trick... Or else play Walkott, Ox on the flanks, Sanchez as striker, Ozil and Rambo as providers, but we do luck a monster CDM to do all the defensive work...

But with two pacey centre - halves, a more attacking approach is less prone to risk.

At his best, he could arguably be more of a pacey goal threat than Hazard, even if he's not quite at the same level in terms of creativity and technique.

Might be more appropriate to compare his contribution to someone like Willian — athletic, pacey, hardworking etc plays in similar position / role but I bet Mourinho is not judging him on his goals.

Unless Arsenal can create such system that will force their players to work harder to help their teammates, a more skillful, pacey, hardworking and tricky attacking midfielder like Isco / Thiago / De Bruyne is more suitable for Arsenal's current system

He's more likely to win a hoofed ball out of defence, then he can hold it up and allow the pacey players like Walcott and Alexis to sprint forward — they can run a lot faster when they don't have to take the ball with them up the pitch.

playing with g - rod up front is like sticking to fingers up to traditional arsenal play of fast movement one twos and pass and move football this is very unlike wenger to make such a major shift away front his normal trends of style of play big man up front with no pace just isn't the wenger way really he needs to go back to the past really to answer the current problem i have noticed all the other top 4 teams are more wenger they are (wengerites to coin a phrase) than wenger himself playing with a big srtong pacey team like we use to have they all copied wengers blueprint and left him behind somewhere along the line and he altered his and its not been the same since do nt change a winning system of power and pace if it is was working for you mr wenger

Then wenger plays a midifield trio with 1 DM, who isn't pacey, nor strong, nor is he a great long range passer anymore Make it even worse, he plays 2 box to box cms who does exactly what the DM should've been doing as well and more.

Have you people notice when wilshere and ramsay are moving forward they look pacey, but when they run back from a counter by the opposition they look laboured, both can not manage wengers formation because they want to continuously move forward, which makes the space smaller for ozil to operate in, ozil was more in the game when Ramsay and wilshere left the field.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

We have pacey striker on lacazette, but wenger formation is more suitable for a target man striker ala giroud.

Arsenal are much more dangerous with three pacey forwards, and Ozil playing just off them.

No denying there are plenty of faster, trickier more prolific strikers than OG but you will need different systems and personnel to play to the strengths of an «on the last shoulder, selfish, pacey, natural finisher» — you gear the team to them and they become the primary focus.

Now with our pacey attack the B2B can sit more back and needs to distribute.

I do not think Giroud is worried as yet, it comes down to who gets more play time, although the style of football may be moving away from hold up, back to pacey forwards base on what we have seen of the team so far.

it should be interesting to see how much more the attacking team develop, we have a pacey attack, we can also switch to an attack with hold up players and we have tricky forwards who can dazzle the opponent.

From the team that Played Gala i would just make one change, take out Cazorla and put in Hayden, we need a more defensive player in that position, who is also good on the ball, has god pace and is more physical and keep our pacey three with ozil behind them

This arsenal team will cause problem to many if we start with our pacey forwards, we can even become more dangerous to our opponents if we BUY A DM.

Song in the news really would not mind having him back, he is a more physical presence than flamini or Arteta, also more pace, another news item that podolski may go, if this does happen, a reus would be great but i would rather, a welbeck, ibarbo or even a Benteke who should be close to fitness, if u notice all the forwards chosen pacey, physical and direct

With a pacey player on the other wing, we have more balance.

The Debuchy / Campbell combo does not do it for me, too slow and not the most creative in my opinion (they are abit too similar, Debuchy needs a more attacking and pacey partner to compliment his skills at the moment).

Do we think he will change his preferences for those types of CM's he seems to love and shake the squad up, maybe looking towards different types of players, like pacey wide men and HM's, that may compliment us more and give greater depth and balance to our team and performances?

After joining as a pacey teenage winger from Cardiff, Ramsey developed into more of a central attacking midfielder.

I think we need a creative player with pace, right now Son is our only quality pacey player but he is more of a finisher type.

Looks pacey and dynamic, and it'll be interesting to see how many more games he gets this season.

Pretty good holding cm we got there but not ready to trust implicitly yet needs a little more experience.yaya would however could be wicked good he gots supremo engino, speedy, good vision, far better ball control and dribbling than flams and built like kolo but with saying that success depends on his ability to adapt to arsenals pacey (not a real word but i like it anyway) passing and movement and plus with all i had mentioned barca would be fools to let him go can not see that but ya never know.

Explosive, pacey players have a greater number of fast twitch muscle fibres than more balanced players.

Salgado showed how to not look like an asshat when you come up against a pacey player and great dribbler like Arshavin; back off a bit more and cede a bit of space.