Not exact matches
Patent
trolls leaned on sympathetic (and self - interested) judges to bully easy settlements out of defendants and force end consumers to
pay more for all sorts of products.
Despite the fact that Pied Piper eventually outsmarts the patent
troll, the startup ends up
paying more in attorney fees than it would have cost to just settle.
Just
more partisan attacks from the guy
paid troll this site.
Readers
trolling Amazon and B & N have become numb to this low price point, with some readers expecting to
pay no
more than $ 0.99 - $ 1.99.
I understand you're «busy», yet kept managing MANY discussions, but it's also lead me to wonder if you are the «
troll» you speak of (I mean as an afterthought... you said you know the host...
more traffic for her, usually
more money, if being
paid... 2 +2 = 4 still, right?
Patent
trolls leaned on sympathetic (and self - interested) judges to bully easy settlements out of defendants and force end consumers to
pay more for all sorts of products.
Patent litigation abuse thrives when patent
trolls can force defendants into making a hard choice:
pay the
troll (even though the claim is absurd) or
pay even
more to your lawyers.
When
trolls sue, small companies
pay more in direct litigation costs than their larger counterparts.
The remote has
more than
paid for itself in the sheer entertainment value of
trolling the kids in our house by talking to them through the Alexa in the kitchen.