(b) an order directing one or
more parties to the proceedings to arrange for a child to attend an appointment (or a series of appointments) with a family consultant.
(5) For the purposes of the preparation of the report, the court may make any other orders, or give any other directions, that the court considers appropriate (including orders or directions that one or
more parties to the proceedings attend, or arrange for the child to attend, an appointment or a series of appointments with a family consultant).
(a) an order directing one or
more parties to the proceedings to attend an appointment (or a series of appointments) with a family consultant;
Not exact matches
If you choose not
to follow the Protocol, you issue
proceedings and either your debtor is familiar with the Protocol or instructs solicitors who are, then the following sanctions can be imposed by the court: - • An order staying the
proceedings which also requires compliance with the Protocol; • An order that if you have not complied you pay the costs of the
proceedings or part of the costs of the other side even if you obtain judgment in your favour; • An order that those costs are paid on a
more stringent basis known as an indemnity basis; • An order depriving the
party who is at fault of any entitlement
to interest or alternatively awarding interest at a reduced rate; • Depending on who is at fault the court can also order payment of a higher interest rate of up
to 10 % above base rate.
The initially promised affordability of the «unitary patent» and Unified Patent Court (UPC) especially for small and medium - sized enterprises (SMEs), which was repeated almost mantra - like throughout the EU legislative
proceedings as one reason why the reform was of utmost importance, ultimately turned out
to be pretty much the opposite, with the level of representation costs
to be reimbursed by the losing
to the winning
party amounting
to up
to more than five times the sum which can currently be claimed in patent litigation
proceedings before the German courts (for
more details on the cost situation created by the reform, cf. the article «Unitary patent and court system — A poisoned gift for SMEs» here).
Part 1 of the Children and Adoption Act 2006, which came into force this week, gives the courts
more flexible powers
to facilitate child contact, and requires individuals
party to proceedings to take part in activities that promote contact with their children.
No
more patients but protected
parties instead —
parties or intended
parties who lack the capacity
to conduct the
proceedings.
Justice minister Lord Faulks said in a written statement last week that insolvency
proceedings had initially been given a two - year reprieve until April 2015 from Laspo
to give insolvency practitioners and other interested
parties «time
to prepare for an adapt
to the changes... the government now agrees that
more time is needed».
If you commence defamation
proceedings in the RCJ or Manchester before 1 April 2013 you will be governed by the PD 51D costs management scheme which is
more relaxed about allowing the receiving
party to depart from his budget than under the new budgeting regime.
Meanwhile, it reports, third
party funding could become
more attractive in English
proceedings, following recent caselaw that an arbitrator has the power
to award a successful
party the costs of its litigation funding.
● It will be even
more exceptional for a costs order
to be made against a non-
party where the applicant had a cause of action against the non-
party and could have joined him as a
party to the original
proceedings.
In a recent decision, the Honourable Justice Myers held that the typical Orders Giving Directions that estate litigation lawyers seek
to allow the
parties to produce documents are» lengthy, intrusive, expensive documentary collection and investigation
proceedings that can last for the better part of a year or
more.»
«[T] he general understanding that
parties to the original
proceedings are automatically
to be named as respondents when these
proceedings are subject
to judicial review was developed in the context of adversarial
proceedings, in which the competing rights of two or
more parties are adjudicated, and not necessarily where the
proceedings, as here, are in the nature of an inquiry,» she wrote.
In Black v Sumitomo [2001] EWCA Civ 1819, Rix LJ considered it did not: «likely
to be
party to proceedings» in r 31.16 (a) and (b) meant no
more than that those
parties are likely
to be
party to proceedings if those
proceedings were issued.
Similar
to other post-grant
proceedings, a
party who is not the patent owner and has not previously filed a civil action seeking a declaratory judgment of invalidity, may petition for Post-Grant Review of one or
more claims.
People who represent themselves in legal battles may not get the outcome that they expect or deserve, it can also mean that the
party with representation is forced
to take on
more of the legal costs and
proceedings can also be slowed down due
to a lack of legal knowledge.
It is further thought that it should reduce the amount of forum shopping which currently takes place where one
party makes a tactical decision
to issue
proceedings in a particular court on the basis that they believe they will receive a
more favourable outcome there than in another court elsewhere.
However it has been
more difficult
to do this in arbitral
proceedings due
to the fact that it is an entirely consensual process, originally built
to accommodate two
parties per arbitration.
3.7 What is the effect in your jurisdiction of pending insolvency
proceedings affecting one or
more of the
parties to ongoing arbitration
proceedings?
It can be
more flexible than court
proceedings and allows the
parties to keep their dispute private.
He noted that there has been «a significant increase in the number of litigants in person» due in part
to the retrenchment in state expenditure and the relatively high cost of legal fees, and suggested «introducing a
more inquisitorial form of process in civil
proceedings where both or at least one
party is unrepresented.»
«If there were fewer reporting restrictions, but
more fear among the
parties to the
proceedings, then the motive behind the openness would have been defeated,» he adds.
As was addressed by George Friedman, ODR seems perfectly suited
to resolve «right
to be forgotten» disputes as (1) the relation between the
parties is and will remain virtual, and (2) online processes are
more convenient than court
proceedings.
(c) that one or
more of the
parties to the
proceedings participate in an appropriate course, program or other service.
(e) one or
more of the
parties to the
proceedings is unable
to participate effectively in family dispute resolution (whether because of an incapacity of some kind, physical remoteness from dispute resolution services or for some other reason); or
The Commission notes that taking steps
to reduce and
more effectively manage the number of
parties to native title
proceedings is of great importance in improving the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the native title system, not only in respect of consent determinations.
Allowing emotions
to cloud the big picture could make
proceedings more difficult and painful for the
parties, or Heft says cause one side
to capitulate and settle for less than what they are entitled
to in an effort
to end the turmoil and conflict.
(2) In any
proceedings in the Family Court, or in another court when exercising jurisdiction under this Act, the court may, of its own motion or on the application of a
party to the
proceedings, make one or
more of the following orders:
(4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the relevant time is the time immediately before the time when the
parties to the marriage separated or, if they have separated on
more than one occasion, the time immediately before the time when they last separated before the institution of the
proceedings in which the divorce order was made.
Separation deeds or agreements are generally used where
parties do not wish
to divorce straight away but want
to regulate their financial and children related affairs until they can bring divorce
proceedings, usually after 2 years or
more separation.
The threshold for joinder as a
party could be amended
to reflect
more traditional tests for standing in civil
proceedings, such as the «special interest» test under general law [77] or the «person aggrieved» test under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth).