Not exact matches
Rather than drone on about supply tightness and healthy demand (which we have discussed many times before here, here, here, here, and here), the point of this note is
more philosophical and intended to offer insights into how to
view the lithium space out over the next 18 to 24 months.
For this reason I would engage now in
more detail with his presentation of a prominent
philosophical tradition from the point of
view of the different one presented by the Faith movement.
Above all, Heidegger's existentialist analysis of the ontological structure of being would seem to be no
more than a secularized,
philosophical version of the New Testament
view of human life.
John Calvin under Augustine's influence explicitly says that God wills every event.17 The criticism we are making of St. Augustine can be made from
more than one
philosophical point of
view.
More adequate is the
philosophical view of critical realism, which combines ontological realism, epistemic perspectivalism, and judgmental rationality.
While his
philosophical views would seem to underwrite a notion of privacy and seclusion, there is no
more public figure to be found in contemporary English - language philosophy.
It was this naive positivism that Kaplan accepted, rather than, for example, the much
more sophisticated
views of his
philosophical mentor John Dewey, as the basis of his argument for religious naturalism.
The
more limited a sphere of knowledge is, and the
more peripheral its
philosophical significance in relation to man, the less directly, therefore, it concerns man himself and what essentially defines his own existence, the
more readily of course the teaching of the faith can be
viewed as a mere norma negativa in regard to that science.
Recognition of the need for an interpenetrative societal
view of the world, perhaps
more than any specific
philosophical requirement, has led process - thinkers to place their emphasis upon «becoming», as a dynamic movement of development in relationship, rather than upon «being»; here, they insist, is the best «model» for our understanding of God.
In 1922, some nine years after Einstein had published his first paper on General Relativity, Whitehead was compelled by the differences he had with Einstein's
view to come forward with his own work, The Principle of Relativity, in which he formulated a theory of gravitation
more in keeping with his own
philosophical outlook.
The first attends to
philosophical and theological questions relative to the American polity, including shifting
views of church - state relations, while the second is directed
more to intra-Jewish questions relative to organizational concerns.
Once
more, the difference runs as deep as the opposing
philosophical views of the «world» that the two theologies hold.
One of the
more frustrating elements of this group (like so many others) is that every effort at edification or even simple concern seems to be challenged for it's
philosophical point of
view.
Professor Tillich himself, to whom we referred at the beginning of this lecture, although not at all identified with process - thought, was insistent on the necessity for the development of a modern
philosophical theology and was increasingly finding himself in sympathy with many of the conclusions of thinkers such as Hartshorne; and
more recently, as he himself acknowledged in the preface to the third volume of Systematic Theology, he associated his own
views with those of Teilhard.
If I am not a Hauerwasian, I am even less a process - relational thinker; hence I am ill - equipped to judge the merits of these proposals on the basis of their coherence with certain basic tenets of process - relational thought — which seems to be the main basis upon which Muray wishes them to be judged since his paper is otherwise fairly thin on
more general
philosophical or Christian theological arguments for the
views he puts forward.
In times when other forces determine the interpretations of events, nature, human life and what have you,
more than religious ones do, it is, in my
view, a temptation to find
philosophical, theological and ethical positions that can disengage Christians from intentional interactions with alternatives.
For example, a curriculum that seems to privilege courses having to do with religious experience, worship, spirituality, counseling, and the like over, say, systematic and
philosophical theology may reveal a commitment to the assumption that God is understood effectively rather than discursively; while a curriculum relatively
more rich in offerings in ethics, sociology of religion, liberation theology, and the like than in offerings in historical theology, patristics, liturgics, and mystical traditions may reveal a commitment to the
view that God is better understood in action than in contemplation.
The Faith theology of what happens in the change of bread and wine at Mass into Christ's own Body and Blood involves a quite different
philosophical framework from that of St Thomas Aquinas: Faith draws on a modern
view of the co-relativity of all matter; Aquinas depends
more on an Aristotelian system of form and matter.
While most books and programs dealing with child sleep issues take
philosophical stands (based largely around the issue of «crying it out»), I believe that your child's sleep is
more important than my personal
views on this subject.
The
view from TIFF: Though its premise of a mysterious planet profoundly affecting its human characters owes much to Andrei Tarkovsky's Solaris, Melancholia is a much simpler film,
more emotional and existential than
philosophical.
Those interested in learning a bit
more about me, my writing methods, the public response to HUNTER, and the role that my
philosophical views played in the novel, will find my comments here.
Rather than focus on some overarching political or
philosophical theme as most group shows tend to do, Visible Range on
view at Deli Gallery in Queens chooses a
more lighthearted conceptual focus; rainbows.
It might be far
more germane to this issue than unrelated
philosophical musings that fit the same pattern, and be interpreted any way one wants to simply reinforce one's point of
view.
Andy, There is another
view here that is
more philosophical.