The defendant objected to the introduction of this evidence, claiming that it was «
more prejudicial than probative» and violated the rules of evidence.
Overall, Courts have found that introduction of the immigration status of a party is either irrelevant or substantially
more prejudicial than probative and thus is inadmissible in court.
«Judges have an extremely difficult job: They have to decide based on intuition alone whether slowing a video is
more prejudicial than probative.
Not exact matches
There is a no
more close minded and
prejudicial individual than a liberal...
The judge added that Bashir failed to clear the accuracy of the transcript with prosecutors before asking that it be admitted and that Gonzalez's taped conversation would be
more «
prejudicial» than «probative» if presented to the jury.
Contrary to stereotypes of online daters popular at the time of the study, and in direct contrast to the
prejudicial views held by participants (especially the undergraduates) in the Donn and Sherman (2002) study, Brym and Lenton found that their sample of online daters was in fact
more sociable offline than the general Canadian population.
If a majority of the Board considers that the charges, if proved, might constitute conduct
prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the Breed, the Board shall order a hearing committee of not less than three and not
more than nine members of the Club having no direct personal involvement in the issues to be heard, and shall fix a date and time for such hearing at a place within the region where the defendant resides.
Even
more troubling is that machine learning can still learn fallacious,
prejudicial, and even discriminatory patterns from humans, without realizing that this is what is happening.
More specifically, the trial court might well have proscribed extrajudicial statements by any lawyer, party, witness, or court official which divulged
prejudicial matters, such as the refusal of Sheppard to submit to interrogation or take any lie detector tests; any statement made by Sheppard to officials; the identity of prospective witnesses or their probable testimony; any belief in guilt or innocence; or like statements concerning the merits of the case.
Judges I've spoken to expressed no concern about such motions, but it's reasonable to suggest that the
more potentially inflammatory and therefore
prejudicial the evidence, the
more difficult it might be for a judge to not be influenced or affected by it.
They are narrower in that nothing in that TWU covenants prohibits a TWU student from being openly gay — indeed, I understand that TWU has had a number of openly gay students in recent years, and the provisions of the covenant prohibiting
prejudicial language and mandating that one «treat all persons with respect and dignity, and uphold their God - given worth from conception to death» would tend to serve to protect gay students from the prejudice one might find on
more secular campuses (and who are we kidding, anti-gay prejudice exists in secular universities).