Sentences with phrase «more radical question»

But this presupposes an even more radical question: What is justice?

Not exact matches

Airbnb gets less press than Uber, but in some respects its even more radical: understanding how it works leads one to question many of the premises of modern society from hotels to regulations.

This is not a question of going back to the fight for survival, to «nature red in tooth and claw,» but the appearance of something infinitely more radical and sinister.

Despite the efforts of the Modern Church People's Union and «Sea of Faith» conferences and other theologically radical groups, many questioning followers of Jesus have drifted away from church life, or at least from participation in the church's decision - making forums, thus allowing undue influence to more traditional positions.

It is more difficult because those who follow the radical response are at least asking the right questions, and sometimes the rest of us don't even question.

It's way more radical to say that an alleged but never proven god is «lord,» as if it's absolutely true and dare I say, not to be questioned, than to clearly say «I don't think so!»

But a more radical party is raising fundamental questions about the historically conditioned character of the Scriptures.

The more radical critics have always rejected it and even the more conservative have been compelled to question its authenticity.

Just as in Bultmann's analysis the questions of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by way of radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.

When one considers the magnitude and radical nature of the questions posed for the theologian by the new world, it is not surprising to find that theologians are beginning to speak about a new reformation more radical than that of the sixteenth century.

Rejecting the necessity for domination, it asks the radical question: Must there «always be a «servant» class, a facilitating group to take the mundane cares from the shoulders of the ««more important» group, and to be controlled by them?

In their more hostile moments, radicals even question the motives of neoconservatives, noting the huge sums of money flowing into neoconservative think tanks and movements.

At a more strictly metaphysical level, it can also be argued, correctly in my opinion, that Whitehead never really deals with the question of creation at its most radical level.

Just as in Bultmann's analysis the question of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by way of radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.32

In response to this sort of self - query, radical theology is being more and more drawn into the disciplines of intellectual history and literary criticism to answer the «when» question, and into philosophy and the behavioral sciences to answer the «why» question.

They also call into question whether the coalition's policies are more radical than many, focusing on spending cuts, have realised.

The question of whether or not to impose green taxes on gas guzzling cars caused division in Westminster again today, with three members of an environmental commission launching a minority report calling the idea «retrospective taxation» while the rest of the committee called for more radical proposals.

Moving on to domestic matters, he signalled that the Tories needed to be much more radical on the question of tax: «At no other time in humanity has wealth gone from young to old.

If you share my view that technology drives history more than any other factor, then you will probably agree that the 21st century is going to be significantly shaped by the outcome of a single question: Will synthetic biology achieve radical success or not?

Radical staff is always open to questions and happy to assist, call us to schedule a test drive or for more information!

You Don't Have to Say You Love Me by Sherman Alexie Promise Me, Dad: A Year of Hope, Hardship, and Purpose by Joe Biden Grant by Ron Chernow Dodge City: Wyatt Earp, Bat Masterson, and the Wickedest Town in the American West by Tom Clavin We Were Eight Years in Power: An American Tragedy by Ta - Nehisi Coates The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia by Masha Gessen Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI by David Grann Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow by Yuval Noah Harari Leonardo da Vinci by Walter Isaacson Endurance: A Year in Space, A Lifetime of Discovery by Scott Kelly Bobby Kennedy: A Raging Spirit by Chris Matthews The American Spirit: Who We Are & What We Stand For by David McCullough Martin Luther: The Man Who Rediscovered God and Changed the World by Eric Metaxas The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women by Kate Moore Code Girls: The Untold Story of the American Women Code Breakers of World War II by Liza Mundy Everything All at Once: How to Unleash Your Inner Nerd, Tap into Radical Curiosity and Solve Any Problem by Bill Nye Democracy: Stories from the Long Road to Freedom by Condoleezza Rice Churchill and Orwell: The Fight for Freedom by Thomas E. Ricks Option B: Facing Adversity, Building Resilience and Finding Joy by Sheryl Sandberg and Adam Grant Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst by Robert M. Sapolsky Theft by Finding: Diaries 1977 — 2002 by David Sedaris Basketball (and Other Things): A Collection of Questions Asked, Answered, Illustrated (B&N Exclusive Edition) by Shea Serrano Where the Past Begins by Amy Tan Astrophysics for People in a Hurry by Neil deGrasse Tyson We're Going to Need More Wine: Stories That Are Funny, Complicated, and True by Gabrielle Union

Although I have yet to find that courage to go «radical sabbatical» the answers to the 2 questions are a big YES and there are so many ways of doing so through my little ways and more.

The participating artists prompt a dialog on questions that, in face of the current radical economic, social and political changes, are more relevant that ever.

For these artists, who were in their 30s and 40s during the 1980s, it was not a question of a «return to painting,» but, rather, of finding a bridge between the radical, deconstructive abstraction of the late 1960s and 1970s (which many of them had been marked by) with a larger painting history and more subjective approaches.

Fionn Meade is an curator and writer who has previously worked at the Walker Art Center where exhibitions included Less ThanOne and Andrea Büttner, Radical Presence: Black Performance in Contemporary Art, and Question the Wall Itself, which presents a range of works conceived as rooms and interior architecture, and includes major installations by Tom Burr, Nina Beier, Cerith Wyn Evans, Lucy McKenzie, Akram Zaatari, Paul Sietsema, Jonathas de Andrade, Walid Raad, and Marc Camille Chaimowicz, among others; as well as Merce Cunningham: Common Time, a retrospective survey of Merce Cunningham's dynamic artistic collaborations, including work from more than seventy artists working across disciplines.

There are many more questions the public has, but because they are never answered, the public has stopped radical action on AGW until our questions are answered.

Pointing out and questioning this attitude can only be good for science, but it may make it more difficult for radical emissions reduction policies to be implemented.

If this is correct, it gives backing to the point made for some time in Harvey that the proper approach (if hitherto the more radical one) is to consider the contemplating / proposing controversy to be now a dead one and to get on with the real question which is to apply Junk v Kuhnel C - 188 / 03 [2005] IRLR 310, ECJ and to require real and genuine, timeous, consultation on the facts.

Airbnb gets less press than Uber, but in some respects its even more radical: understanding how it works leads one to question many of the premises of modern society from hotels to regulations.