Ever since early nineties, starting with the well - known article by Jacqué and Weiler, much has been written on the various solutions,
more radical suggestions for reform of the «judicial architecture» included.
Some experts, however, have made
more radical suggestions, including bending and twisting the laws of gravity and motion.
Not exact matches
This is not a
radical suggestion; no matter how great the candidate, no vote can ever represent
more than a sign of preference, for in a sinful world, there has never been and never will be a perfect candidate.
We are always looking for ways to increase the pressure so
suggestions as to how to be «
more radical» would be appreciated.