She also experimented with happenings and performances, sometimes appearing as an element in her own installations, other times involving members of the public and entering public spaces in
a more radical way.
What about
a more radical way of combatting the expansion of the achievement gap over the summer?
One other speaker at the Colorado conference offered
a more radical way of making the American launchers more competitive: using rockets for space tourism.
But there is an even
more radical way we'll transform our cities.
Thus, in my protest I seek to foster a better,
more radical way to live how Jesus taught, which is more alert to the destructive state of fashion as we know it today.
We must of course make a special exception for human life, which transcends this evolutionary process in a far
more radical way.
Comparably joins a growing chorus of companies seeking to bring greater transparency to the workforce, some in
more radical ways than others.
With decades - long searches failing to find the hypothetical dark matter particles that theorists have favored, physicists are turning to
more radical ways of explaining the universe's missing mass.
Not exact matches
«What we have realized is that we have a built a pretty
radical solution in terms of how to create a better
more efficient
way to bring organic food to people in the U.S.»
Some of high - ranking retired military brass are advocating for a
radical way to bolster national security: Improve the fitness of children» Read
More
And as it inches closer to mainstream adoption, the
more radical and sometimes illegal uses (such as gambling and ransomware payments) will likely give
way market share to uses that have broad appeal (such as machine payments and store of value).
We all still processing the data coming in from India's
radical experiment with cash, and I still think that is
way too soon to pass any judgement at all on whether the experiment has been Read
more...
That's
more radical than reversing this to restore the economy's financial structure to the
way it used to be.
I also think it's telling that he is criticizing how «fashionable» critiquing Empire is... Interesting how
more and
more people are realizing that Empire has some serious problems (in my eyes a positive) and the vested progressive doesn't want to be seen as fashionable... So he critiques the critique... as a new
way to be
radical?!? Not sure...
But many wonder whether science is reductive in a
more radical and disturbing
way — by flattening, collapsing, and trivializing the world.
It was in this
way that fundamentalism, under the guise of evangelicalism, was becoming
more dominant in the churches at the very same time as academic theology and biblical scholarship were becoming
more radical.
This
way of posing the problem is
more radical than that implicit in the usual juxtaposition of violence and love.
So even though trying to live faithfully as part of an affluent society, with all the temptations this entails, is in some
ways more difficult and
more uncomfortable than living the
radical response, it does have several important advantages:
His task was not to link the present and the past but rather to forge a
way from the present to the future, and thereby to make possible a new and
more radical form of faith.
More important, he was a
radical, a man who left behind the land and presumably also the
ways of his fathers in search of something new.
We might call that the «external program» of the Counter-Culture, circa 1965 - 1968, posed as an alternative to the
way the New Left activists of the day were staking so much upon political action, with an intensity that ran into ever
more radical stances.
The second
way of conceiving connectedness is
more radical and can be found in the Zen school of Mahayana Buddhism.
Some
radical black nationalists are not above saying, increasingly
more openly now, that blacks can never make it in «white America» - and so we should stop trying, go our own
way, and maybe burn a few things down in the process.
It's
way more radical to say that an alleged but never proven god is «lord,» as if it's absolutely true and dare I say, not to be questioned, than to clearly say «I don't think so!»
The securest
way to the rapturous sorts of happiness of which the twice - born make report has as an historic matter of fact been through a
more radical pessimism than anything that we have yet considered.
honestly i do not respect the athiest
way, but you sir show that you are different then the
radicals who are not even caring about the people who lost their lives, but
more about a statue..
But the increasing presence of women with feminist sympathies in positions of leadership in the church may open the
way to
more radical changes in due course.
I believe that if we, as followers of Jesus, are truly going to be living
radical, missional lives of purpose, protecting the planet, healing the abused, giving water to the thirsty, feeding the starving, inventing new and better
ways of doing things, and leading the
way for global change, then every year we should see
more and
more Christians on this list.
Maybe it's because I take after him so much temperamentally (bookish hardcore introvert) and theologically (I absorbed a lot of that from his seminary student days when I was 10 - 13 years old, but I'm
more radical in a lot of
ways — for instance, he was a bit of a prude and I know I'm
more «morally liberal»), but all that public heart - on - sleeve stuff just makes my skin crawl.
Some Christian pacifism has made its
radical protest on that point alone, the refusal of military service, but
more often it has appeared as the declaration of a
way of life intended to express love directly, as in the Society of Friends.
It is surely impossible to imagine any
way revelation could «continue» beyond these sacred moral principles, or put permanent restraints on their ever
more radical enactment.
Just as in Bultmann's analysis the questions of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by
way of
radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even
more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.
Now, however, the high moral ground of liberty, justice, and openness had been captured by those who interpreted those terms in
ways decidedly
more radical than the establishment had ever conceived.
When the writings of Wallis and other evangelicals long associated with the Christian left (yes, there was an organization called «Evangelicals for McGovern») are offered up as a «
radical biblical
way that transcends the highly politicized agendas» of the Christian right and the PC left, one can't help but think that the whole thing is
more than a little disingenuous.
I believe that I have not only maintained these two points, but that I have established them in a
more complete and
radical way than Whitehead himself was able to do.
It was another German missiologist, Georg F. Vicedom, who has the honour of having developed the concept of missio Dei in a
way that seems to be consistent with the
more classical missiology that preceded Willingen, and quite different from the
more radical missiology that, under the same label, was worked out during the 1960s.
Again, the substantial changes suggested are, in their own
way, a
more radical form of tweaking.
Just as in Bultmann's analysis the question of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by
way of
radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even
more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.32
Britain and Holland were the first beneficiaries of these developments, having led the
way in the
more radical stage of the Protestant Reformation.
Yet in many
ways the feminist call for change was even
more radical, since relations between men and women are fundamental to all human existence.
Hence, under the influence of Hartshorne and Whitehead there developed a group of thinkers who took on the theological task in a
more traditional
way than had previously been common among the
radical empiricists.
Yeah, it's terrible when non-christians don't understand that you're not supposed to criticize the church, and that the
more radical sects of christianity should be able to behave in bigoted and reprehensible
ways as long as they do it in the name of god.
A dialectical methodology seeks to be both
radical and catholic in such a
way that the
radical side is not just an «attack,» but the critical word of the tradition itself to judge, transform and renew it in new and
more humanizing
ways for all of us.
Yet its alienation from other
radical movements, especially black liberation, and its recourse to a kind of «separatist» ideology — that talks about the oppression of women as
more basic than any other form of oppression in a
way that makes women a separate cause unrelated to other kinds of oppression — may be working its own kind of subtle social encapsulation.
The
way free
radical do their damage is by carrying around one or
more unpaired electrons, which makes them unstable.
But whether he goes the
way of New
Radicals or Beethoven — who actually had
more hits than the ominous tune the dog barked at in the movie — they'll talk Johnny Football 2K12 at the Downtown Athletic Club for years to come.
We are always looking for
ways to increase the pressure so suggestions as to how to be «
more radical» would be appreciated.
Although its arguments were in many
ways much
more intellectually significant (and
radical) than many in the party initially appreciated, it was resisted by strong counter-ideological headwinds that wanted to defend the social - democratic status quo.
In its
way, this is far
more radical and remarkable than a black president in the US or a female chancellor in Germany.
ABI have led the
way through
radical reforms to savings and retirement, modernised the civil justice system, campaigned for solutions fit for our future and much
more.