Sentences with phrase «more rational people»

More rational people say «this utterly insignificant risk of intervention, this vanishingly minor risk of C section — those are totally worth avoiding the insanely major risk of stillbirth or brain damage or NICU stays».

Personally I think anybody that follows an organized religion ought to be preemptively placed in prison to protect the more rational people in this world.

I don't even make fun of the more rational people that believe in one religion or another.

I applaud the more rational people posting on this blog who have the patience to try and get these people to argue logically.

Not exact matches

Erin Lowry, author of Broke Millennial: Stop Scraping By and Get Your Financial Life Together, says, «People's relationship to money is not rational, it's emotional... We need to focus more on the psychological blocks and triggers that stand in people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.&People's relationship to money is not rational, it's emotional... We need to focus more on the psychological blocks and triggers that stand in people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.&people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.»

But when you claim that you've «beaten» your main competitor, Lyft, and say that an additional service will be more expensive and you hear that people don't trust you anymore because things keep changing and they can't make rational plans, getting angry and blaming them isn't the solution.

«In my experience people who assert statements like that are often immune to evidence or rational argument, and envision themselves as superior beings who are more enlightened than the rest of us.»

People who work with a financial advisor feel more confident, they save more, they take action (and don't procrastinate retirement planning) and they make rational moves with their money.

The platform moves away from rational buying points and into a more emotional pitch of improving people's lives.

That is how us rational people feel when the candidates fight over who loves god more.

The loudest factions of Christianity and atheism aren't the largest, which presents the occasion for mutual understanding: open, honest, introspective and rational discussion between groups of people who share more in common than not.

If you wish to convince any rational person of the validity of your bible, you'll have to come up with a little bit more than what you've got.

These are the very people that we should be taking OUT of the gene pool, so that future generations might be more intelligent and rational.

I'm not saying the unnecessary suffering of animals is good, or moral, but rather pointing out that your perspective on the subject is no more rational, no more based on fact, than that of the people you are arguing against.

«Evidence» that no rational person would accept for any other claim — even more modest ones.

Of course I think a more rational approach is to simply view all those verses as written by mere people.

More prevalent and more insidious is the fact that just war discourse deceives sincere people by the very nature of its claim to base moral discernment upon the facts of the case and on universally accessible rational principMore prevalent and more insidious is the fact that just war discourse deceives sincere people by the very nature of its claim to base moral discernment upon the facts of the case and on universally accessible rational principmore insidious is the fact that just war discourse deceives sincere people by the very nature of its claim to base moral discernment upon the facts of the case and on universally accessible rational principles.

Yet more evidence that religions (not faith mind you) is populated by ignorant people who would rather use their fears and insecurities to rule their decisions than rational thought.

If you want to convince people of the truth of Christianity, the best way to «argue» it today is not through reason and and rational propositions, but by becoming more and more like Jesus in everything we do.

It does make Christians look bad and I have never seen a group of people who were more rational and down to earth.

Lots of people will argue that it will be impossible to judge performance over time — and it may take a while before the markets will adjust to a new, more rational management approach — but we must take the risk and move in that direction.

But the fact that Santa is based on a real person makes belief in him more rational than a belief in gods.

Actually — if you take a rational look at the facts - Jack, Catholics have done more to spread peace and help people in need than any other group — that's why I'm proud to be Catholic.

If Christians would just follow Jesus» example and keep their nose out of matters that don't concern them they would get a lot more respect from rational reasonable people like myself.

Surely the person who is both rational and loving contributes more value to God than one who is rational and full of hate.

We can, from a Rawlsian view, presume that consent from all future generations; persons will always be for changes to nature that make them more free, responsible, and rational.

And Locke and Rousseau do agree, after all, that the consequence of satisfying one human need is to create another and more difficult need to satisfy, and so people become increasingly rational and industrious in their increasingly Historical pursuits of happiness.

But although the real basis of the community's life was always the total event we have described, its attempt to give a rational explanation of its life took more and more the form of an effort to define the nature of the person.

Not sure about the majority, but if more people made rational decisions then we would have a better shot at making this country better for more people, yes.

More rational and peaceful people than extremists..

HOWEVER... it is exceedingly rare that two or more individuals who witnessed the same event would disagree on the fundamentals of that event or completely omit details that would strike any rational person as being too important to leave out.

Not sure which is more terrifying — Pat sounding somewhat rational about science, or the fact that 46 % of people surveyed think the planet and everything on it is less than 10,000 years old.

That's not «belief» in anything... it's quite the opposite... a rational person constantly doubts his / her knowledge, and always looks for more knowledge that may explain something better.

Everyone loves him, and he is even more popular then ever even though every rational thinking person knows the truth about Santa.

You can expect rational people to respond to christians more than to others.

Like many other activities of ministry — rendering a theological judgment, structuring a sermon, being present to persons in acute crisis, discerning the plan of action and strategy to which a congregation is called at a particular moment in its life — choosing a myth requires the complex interworking of rational judgment, adequate information, emotional openness and self - awareness, intuition, sensitivity, prayerful reflection, and more.

@Kyle, I never suggested that I said that if research had been done in the proper fields, most rational people would question their faith I guess archaeology is bit of a stretch as it is more of a human history based field but there were civilizations more than 6000 years ago

With all due respect, as an Atheist, I am far more level headed, rational and have more morals than many people who are believers.

If atheist were as rational as they propose, they would realize that calling religious people names isn't furthering the goal of converting anyone to their way of thinking any more than it is affecting pending legislation.

typically, when people make outlandish claims, others of undoubtedly more rational thinking, prefer to see said claims substantiated with some evidence.

From this day forward and forever more No person of sane and rational mind shall stoop to acknowledge in any fashion the lowly destroyer of reason HeavenSent.

It's also irrational to think that the number of people involved makes their belief the slightest bit more logical or rational.

These findings could lead to a more rational approach for telling people which foods are a better fit for them, based on their microbiomes,» he said.

It's ten years old at this point, but I don't believe any rational person can view the film and think that a more laissez faire approach to health care would fix the problems that have historically plagued the US health care system.

It's true people lending do expect to get back money plus some profit — or they should, if they are rational, which isn't true as often as you'd think — however all that does is lead to inflation, and possibly more inflation after that, which I already acknowledged.

You can hear me almost chuckling, because it's not reasonable, it's not rational, and as the years click by, it's ever more preposterous, but people still stick to their guns.

This could boil down to the fact that our senses become less acute with age, or perhaps it is simply that older people have had more life experience and take a more rational view of potential threats.

«They might even consider themselves more rational than other people.

Work led by Richard Thaler has demonstrated that, when people are asked to commit to saving money in the distant future (as opposed to right now), they end up making much more economically rational decisions.

«Outsiders may have a much more objective and rational perspective on the partnership than the two people involved do.»