Sentences with phrase «more risk reward ratio»

I say that because I get a lot of emails from traders telling me they can't get a proper 1:2 or more risk reward ratio because there are too many support or resistance levels in the way.

I say that because I get a lot of emails from traders telling me they can't get a proper 1:2 or more risk reward ratio because there are too many support or resistance levels in the way.

Not exact matches

As such, we expect any pullback to be short - term and eventually lead to fresh buying opportunities with more positive reward - risk ratios for buy entry, at least at the present time.

However, yesterday's price action in EEM now makes our reward to risk ratio even more favorable for -LSB-...]

However, yesterday's price action in EEM now makes our reward to risk ratio even more favorable for buy entry because the ETF gapped lower on the open, then reversed to close at its intraday high.

XRP has the lowest risk / reward ratio in the market right now which means you stand to gain a lot more for taking a comparatively smaller risk.

We buy stocks with the potential to go up 50 % or more over the next two years, with a reward - to - risk ratio of three to one.

The benefit of this technique is that it's a more conservative approach (because price is already established above the neckline) that often leads to a good reward to risk ratio, especially with descending necklines (see the image above).

In my experience, patterns with horizontal or descending necklines provide better reward to risk ratios (more on this below).

For even more detail, adding elements such as the direction (long or short) of your trades, risk to reward ratio, length of each trade, photos of your setups and exits... can be very enlightening.

The entry could have been taken at the open of the next candlestick after the bearish confirmation candlestick closed, if you wanted to be more aggressive and improve your chances of a good risk to reward ratio; or you could have taken the trade once price broke 1 pip below the low of the confirmation, as I've shown in the example above.

we have to take decision at the end of 6 months when risk reward ratio as per our analysis say it can not give more than 20 % annualized return from there onward and on the other hand some other cheap stock are waiting for us... Even if one stock which we just sold after earlier will become multi baggar does not mean law of probability say us to hold it..

One disadvantage of the cypher pattern is that it has a tendency to provide trading setups in which the reward to risk ratio leans more toward risk than reward (at least at the first take profit level).

With Wells Fargo, the stock has more than doubled and that has dramatically changed the risk reward ratio.

The volatility of the DRS is certainly higher than any of the bond options, but the DRS's superior Sharpe ratio of 0.67 indicates the additional risk was more than adequately rewarded with additional return.

The second method is a bit more aggressive and offers a lower risk to reward ratio.

Therefore, in MCT there exists a risk / reward ratio — i.e., the more the risk of loss, the greater the possibilities for reward.

I will continue to favor the 50 % entry method for its more favorable risk - to - reward ratio.

It offers a more favorable risk - to - reward ratio, sometimes doubling the potential profit of a setup.

And then later if the situation becomes better (getting better price and risk reward ratio) I enter more money.

The risk - to - reward ratio is far more dangerous down at these lows than it was back then.

A risk reward ratio of 3 - 5 would be more interesting.

If you look at the equity curve you can see that two things: 1) When the market became completely chaotic the system lost more trades than usual but it never resulted in a huge draw down because of the favorable risk reward ratio of 1:4 (or better).

If a trader risked getting into 2000 pips drawdown (or more, potentially more than their free margin can tolerate) for the usual 100 - 200 pips profit it would mean a disastrous risk - to - reward ratio accompanied with a potentially long - term capital lock.

During a more volatile time, when the potential loss is 100 - 200 pips, it stops being an effective risk to reward ratio.

The exact value of «far more dangerous» depends on the local risk of cycling — in England the estimate is that per cyclist the risk: reward ratio is about 1:10; here in the US (with our riskier roads) it is about 1:5, but in the Netherlands it is 1:25.