Sentences with phrase «more scientific knowledge»

If a person does not know something, then a person by reason can simply say so and do their best in that situation, then pursue getting more scientific knowledge.

That is the special rational capacity that makes it possible for them to make reliable use of so much more scientific knowledge than they could realistically be expected to understand in a technical sense.

Now, despite the fact that we have more scientific knowledge and more access to research and literature than ever before regarding the importance of calories, the energy balance and how to structure our diets for optimal muscle building and fat loss through the use of flexible dieting, much of the training and dieting community is still stuck in the dark ages.

Much more scientific knowledge is needed about probiotics including safety and appropriate dosage and how they can best benefit women with PCOS.

We have taken a stance against them for ten months but we needed the opinion of someone with more scientific knowledge than ourselves, someone we trust and admire, in order to continue going against the pressure from the cardiologist.

Not exact matches

Metzger points out that there are far more asteroids near Earth than could ever be explored solely through scientific funding, and highlights the role terrestrial mining operations have played in expanding geologic knowledge.

Many people place man at a higher plateau in knowledge as we learn more and more about our universe through science, and yet our predecessors knew enough to not throw out their religion just because their knowledge grew in scientific matters.

The more I have studied the bible, and believe me I have spent years studying it and other religious books, the more I see this as a hangover from primitive days when our ancestors had no scientific knowledge and had to imagine gods to explain things.

He urges us to «recognize belief once more as the source of all knowledge» and insists that scientific research is carried on only within «a fiduciary framework».

Knowledge is far more than facts subject to scientific method.

As has been argued in the pages of Faith before, as most scientists intuit, scientific knowledge is no more provisional or functional in character than all knowledge of the physical.

The first part of the same column deals with a topic that has recently become more prominent in the Christian interpretation of our scientific knowledge of the world, namely our experience of beauty.

everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.

As science learns more and more about how the Universe works, the ignorance gaps in our scientific knowledge become smaller and smaller... the same with your man made god named Jehovah.

Nevertheless, because it was located within an academic department, it did little more than argue with others in that department against dualism and in favor of the relevance of scientific knowledge.

Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge, [2] in contrast to more common uses of the word «theory» that imply that something is unproven or sScientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge, [2] in contrast to more common uses of the word «theory» that imply that something is unproven or sscientific knowledge, [2] in contrast to more common uses of the word «theory» that imply that something is unproven or speculative

The events of the past decade have demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that the scientific community is driven by government money and political correctness far more than any genuine desire for «objective» knowledge.

«but more profound scientific knowledge will lead you a few of you to God», rather than being so positive about something you can't be positive about... especially since, I would never be one of «God's followers, believers, whatever», even if I saw him face to face and shook his hand.

Its the relgious that have tried to surpress scientific knowledge, but over the last 50 years we have ventured more into the universe than ever & the church has had to adapt.

Atheism is becoming much more mainstream and popular because we are in the era of progressive scientific knowledge in the past decades that is unmatched, and with education comes questions of why and how.

I am not trying to prove that the Qur» an is the word of God using scientific knowledge as a yard stick because any yardstick is supposed to be more superior than what is being checked or verified.

We know so much more than people of the past — not only scientific knowledge about the physical world, but also historical knowledge about our cultural origins.

For us Muslims the Qur» an is the Furqan i.e. criteria to judge right from wrong and the ultimate yardstick which is more superior to scientific knowledge.

The Cultural Dimension As culture develops, so too will religion in order that it may answer more adequately the basic problems of human life and to further deepen the synthesis of scientific knowledge with religious knowledge - the principle of evolution is written into the nature of religion, as in all life.

It is much more in tune with the gradual, developmental model of knowledge acquisition towards which modern scientific methodology pushes.

Of course, this «more» to human and cosmic reality need not be transcendent in any sense other than «beyond»: beyond our present ordinary awareness and knowledge, perhaps in principle beyond purely scientific avenues of knowledge.

Such a concession could be exploited by promoters of rival sources of knowledge, such as philosophy and religion, who would be quick to point out that faith in naturalism is no more «scientific» (i.e., empirically based) than any other kind of faith.

Let them blend new sciences and theories and the understanding of the most recent discoveries with Christian morality and the teaching of Christian doctrine, so that their religious culture and morality may keep pace with scientific knowledge and with the constantly progressing technology... Thus they will be able to interpret and evaluate all things in a truly Christian spirit,... and priests will be able to present to our contemporaries the doctrine of the Church concerning God, man and the world, in a manner more adapted to them so that they may receive it more willingly.»

Yes, science adjusts its position as more knowledge is obtained; this is in stark contrast to religion which relies on ancient texts to explain the world even though those texts were written in ignorance and scientific knowledge shows them to be false.

Explain how any biblical account is more believable than scientific knowledge.

Whether it be Wieman's general appropriation of James's «knowledge by acquaintance» in Religious Experience and Scientific Method, Meland's «appreciative awareness,» or Loomer's more narrative forms of gathering evidence, each purports merely to describe, but then evinces that the description is driven by rather specific personal and / or contextual definitions of what counts as religious experience.

Recently, even those who accept physico - chemical entities as a basis of all scientific knowledge have realized that something more may be involved in them than the properties of mass, energy, etc., attributed to them in classical theory.

It is common scientific knowledge now that not only life, but the stars, galaxies, planets on the macroscale and the subatomic layers at the micro level are all involved in transformations to which the word story seems more and more applicable.

to madtown, Why Jesus was sent in Israel, because that place was part of the Roman Empire, the center of the worlds civilizatoon at that time, in the third century after Him, the Roman emperor, Constantine decreed that christianity was the official religion of the empire, and soo the teachings of Jesus inspired the whole empire, now the present Europe and the Middle East has prospered more than anywhere else in the world, The Americas was not even discovered yet by Columbus, With the prosperity of the empire was the growth of scientific knowledge that leads to what we are now, it happened because its part of Gods Will, History is its Reflectiom.

Moreover, in addressing «the nature of the academic calling» (as they significantly still put it), the AAUP argued that «if education is the cornerstone of the structure of society and if progressing in scientific knowledge is essential to civilization, few things can be more important than to enhance the dignity of the scholar's profession...» Scientific knowledge and free inquiry thus gained near - sacrscientific knowledge is essential to civilization, few things can be more important than to enhance the dignity of the scholar's profession...» Scientific knowledge and free inquiry thus gained near - sacrScientific knowledge and free inquiry thus gained near - sacred status.

Science itself is incapable of making moral judgments and it is not really too wild a step of the imagination to think of a situation where scientific knowledge is valued more highly than human lives.

But belief in such powers per se is no more affected by scientific knowledge than belief in God himself.

The Universe, known and unknown, is possibly not the most used definition of God, at least in the western world... but it is the Pantheistic version that jives so much more with science and is not a misappropriation of the smaller definitions of God, merely an unfamiliar definition to those with less knowledge of various more advanced religious and philosophic thought, within and outside those religions... The idea of Pantheism also thoughtfully considers why there is, rather than ridiculing, such a wide range of philosophical and ritual beliefs from a scientific perspective... without having to classify large groups of people, as senseless idiots from one end or destined for hell from the other.

Perhaps evidence more compelling than what I've read does exist... but regardless, we still have firm evidence, based on all prior scientific knowledge... that whatever the truth is, about «creation» and everything else... is it is all logical, following natural law, even if its natural law we don't yet know.

The scientist as a person can not fail to be vitally interested in how scientific work fits into the more general pattern of knowledge and how it is to be employed for good and constructive uses.

I think I was put on this earth to make the world a better place — or help people to get more out of life — in a way that doesn't require any scientific knowledge.

The pace of expanding scientific knowledge is already producing a public demand for reviewing policy more frequently: 95 per cent in the 2005 study felt abortion law should be kept under regular review, and 61 per cent agreed that abortion law has not kept up with our knowledge of early development in the womb.

The Governor who titled his speech, «Towards an Inclusive Good Youruba and Good Muslim», however enjoined religious leaders on the need to dwell more on scientific knowledge, which according to him has redefined the world.

What's more important, isolated Nature - level breakthroughs, or low level publications that keep the scientific machine going and pass on knowledge to the next generation of scientists?

Research is systematic study directed toward more complete scientific knowledge or understanding of the subject studied.

The purpose of the program is to make practical contributions to more effective use of scientific knowledge in government, to educate the scientific communities regarding public policy, and to broaden the perspective of both the scientific and governmental communities regarding the value of such science - government interaction.

People are more tolerant of sweeping changes in scientific knowledge when it's not a part of their plates.

More scientific organizations should follow this model of providing its membership with the mandate of using their knowledge and scientific creations to motivate our citizenry to pursue scientific studies.

If the growing awareness of an ongoing problem has led to more transparency, the scientific process, and the public who benefits from the knowledge it generates, will be better off.

If more scientists come to think of a new publication as a larval stage of scientific knowledge and if fewer schools and funding agencies prize the high - profile journal article — basing tenure, grant and promotions on it — then researchers will feel less pressure to cut corners and manufacture dramatic results.