Sentences with phrase «more scientific name»

Macrosomia is the more scientific name to explain the birth of a larger babies.

I also get worried when there are a tonne of ingredients on labels that I've never heard of / can't pronounce but from the research I've done, quite a few of the more scientific names aren't actually chemicals, just the scientific names for regular, naturally occurring ingredients.

Not exact matches

(a name which, combined with the group's penchant for posting scarcely any actual scientific material but a lot of pictures of natural phenomena, has prompted more than one actual scientist of my acquaintance to mutter under her breath, «What you truly love is pictures»).

This objection is, for the lack of a better name, nothing more than «egg mysticism»: the belief that eggs are somehow so potently driven to create zygotes that no scientific manipulation will prove capable of deflecting the egg from its preordained path.

As science learns more and more about how the Universe works, the ignorance gaps in our scientific knowledge become smaller and smaller... the same with your man made god named Jehovah.

R.D. Wilson who wrote «A Scientific Investigation of the Old Testament» pointed out that the names of 29 Kings from ten nations (Egypt, Assyria, Babylon and more) are mentioned not only in the Bible but are also found on monuments of their own time.

So do some other people who have never studied pantheistic doctrines, but who have the feeling that a polysyllabic phrase sounds much more scientific and intellectual than a simple name like «God.»

The scientific names are PU (polyurethane) and PVC (polyvinylchloride) PU is better for the environment and so although more expensive 88 only uses PU in our bags.»

Only by pulling back the veil of secrecy, informing citizens of the atrocities that their tax money is funding and holding experimenters accountable for abusing animals in the name of science when more reliable, cruelty - free options exist, can we hope to bring scientific research into the modern age.

As worthy as these scientists» scientific and public achievements are, when the average person can name maybe five science celebrities at the most — but could probably name more than 1000 nonscience celebrities (I'm just guessing, but if you have a few hours, try it)-- it's time to admit that we're using the word «celebrity» differently than the rest of the world is.

Many of the submissions from doctors (she recognized a few of the names from questionable JAMA papers) read more like advertising testimonials than well - designed, well - executed scientific studies.

Science gains from a long - standing «20/20» rule: To get a meteorite name and an official classification — which makes a stone more valuable — a dealer or collector must hand over to a scientific institution 20 grams or 20 % of the weight of the stone, whichever is less.

The scientific name of the long - limbed salamander, Nyctanolis pernix, translates as «night anole,» because this nocturnal salamander runs and leaps more like an anolis lizard than a salamander.

If you intend to look for another industry job, then the ability to share scientific generalities on your project, your meeting abstracts, patents you've applied for, and your supervisor's name at your last company will be more important than the fact that you've published in the journal Biophysical Communications.

More than seventy species of macroalgae inhabiting the deep reefs were identified during the study, and several more new species have not yet been assigned formal scientific naMore than seventy species of macroalgae inhabiting the deep reefs were identified during the study, and several more new species have not yet been assigned formal scientific namore new species have not yet been assigned formal scientific names.

Is there yet a compendium naming the top ten rhetorical ruses trial lawyers use and their more famous applications to scientific advocacy?

Levinson has authored or co-authored more than 80 scientific articles and has been a named inventor on 11 United States patents.

> a compendium naming the top ten rhetorical ruses trial > lawyers use and their more famous applications to scientific advocacy?

They are among 192 distinguished scientists who were named ACS Fellows in recognition of their outstanding accomplishments in chemistry and service to ACS, the world's largest scientific...» More...

It doesn't cost $ 20 a bag, or come from the wind - swept plains of the Andes, or have a name that sounds more like a scientific classification than something edible.

Our current signage consists of nothing more than common name, scientific name and price.

It has more than one scientific name, too: it is now known...

Somewhere out there are an Army of Einsteins and — perhaps more pertinently, as he had only a 10th Grade education — Farradays, who — like me — got screwed over by Bad Teachers, Bad Schools, and / or our own Bad Teenaged Selves; all of who can — and should bve allowed to — take part in the Scientific Process, even if we do not (yet) have «some letters after our names».

> a compendium naming the top ten rhetorical ruses trial > lawyers use and their more famous applications to scientific advocacy?

She also wrote three books, 80 scientific treatises and more than 70 articles and professional papers; lectured at 60 American universities and in 19 countries abroad; appeared in 50 television specials and documentaries; was the subject of many biographies and profiles; made intriguing scientific discoveries; and had four species of fish named for her.

Since the global moratorium on commercial whaling was introduced in 1986, Japan has defied the ban and killed more than 15,000 whales in the name of scientific research.

These allegations were reported gleefully in the Boston Globe, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Nature, Scientific American, and many other media outlets and news pages of science journals in a manner calculated not only to divert attention from the conclusions of our paper but also to damage Dr Soon's reputation in his scientific calling, to put his employment at the Center at risk, to deter more serious journals from accepting future papers bearing his name as an author, to deter potential funders for fear of adverse publicity, and thus to threaten not only his livelihood but also the scienceScientific American, and many other media outlets and news pages of science journals in a manner calculated not only to divert attention from the conclusions of our paper but also to damage Dr Soon's reputation in his scientific calling, to put his employment at the Center at risk, to deter more serious journals from accepting future papers bearing his name as an author, to deter potential funders for fear of adverse publicity, and thus to threaten not only his livelihood but also the sciencescientific calling, to put his employment at the Center at risk, to deter more serious journals from accepting future papers bearing his name as an author, to deter potential funders for fear of adverse publicity, and thus to threaten not only his livelihood but also the science he loves.

Skepticism in general does not make strong scientific claims, as it is more about what we do not know (hence the name skepticism).

But when some of those same know - nothings want something more than scientific consensus — namely, objective proof beyond a shadow of a doubt — the name calling and marginalization begin in earnest.

Your trolls attack you for not naming names — I'm far more interested in you naming evidentiary junctures in the trajectory of climate science at which, with hindsight, you believe scientific objections ought to have been voiced, whether by you or someone else, and what you now think of the conclusions that escaped such attention.

For example he discusses the recent CERN paper by Kirkby (he even misspells the name as Kirby as all the deniers do) and claims that the paper «is providing scientific evidence that low solar activity causes more cosmic rays which indirectly increases cloud cover and reduces solar penetration, followed by cooling».

The Orwellian - named «Discovery Institute» is an organization dedicated to the promotion of Intelligent Design (ID), which is little more than a superficial repackaging of long - discredited creationist arguments against evolutionary theory.They do not have a legitimate scientific program, although they desperately try to create the impression that they do.

Named «Cheyenne,» the 5.34 - petaflop system is capable of more than triple the amount of scientific computing performed by the previous NCAR supercomputer, Yellowstone.

Rajan, who asked that Ladders change his real name, has worked more than 30 years in technology; he has a doctorate in material science, boasts several articles published in industry and scientific journals, and has developed a number of patent - pending technologies.