Not exact matches
Generally, an entrepreneur can not own 50 percent or
more of the business that his or her IRA is invested in, unless the company has a minority
shareholder with complete veto
power over all transactions — but in some cases, even that won't be allowed.
By allowing certain stock to have
more voting
power than other stock our company takes our public
shareholder money but does not let us have an equal voice in our company's management.
But in his blog post he said the exchange was «introducing additional safeguards to protect investors against the potential misuse of
power,» including
more corporate governance requirements and certain limits on founding
shareholders in these structures.
As European governments reach for
more power to fend off unwanted mergers, Akzo has shown how
shareholders can lose out.
But what if the answer to a deficit of corporate legitimacy was to give
shareholders even
more — not less —
power?
Clearly,
shareholders are interested in having
more power over the direction of Alphabet and are not in agreement with top management.
This way the
shareholders can retain their level of control in the company without having to go out and purchase
more shares just for the
power of the vote that will give the
shareholder more clout at the board level for his / her interests in corporate activities.
However, in Quebec and elsewhere in Canada, a number of large corporations have one or
more significant
shareholders, including Couche - Tard, Bombardier, CGI,
Power Corporation, Jean Coutu Group and Transcontinental.
The
shareholders holding the most shares has much
more decision
power — the votes of the board count
more than others.
We clearly need to give
more powers to long term
shareholders, reduce the voting rights of short term speculators, reduce the
power of CEOs on boards, and increase the
power and independence of non-executive board members.
The demand, from one of the most significant and influential voices on the left of the Labour party, marks a departure from the usual narrative on responsible capitalism, which usually focuses on handing
shareholders more power.
And Vince Cable has said
shareholders should have
more power in this area, Clegg says.
Since many small
shareholders simply don't vote, that will give
more power to institutional and activist
shareholders who do.
Far too many executives have become
more concerned with the four P's — pay, perks,
power, and prestige — rather than making profits for
shareholders.
While a
more realistic assumption, such as a
power law distribution in
shareholder size, will change the values of voting
power, it will not change the main results: percentage ownership alone does not equal voting
power, allowing for full optimization of voting
power.
Otherwise, the company retains the fire -
power to repeat the exercise (with another tender offer, and / or open market buybacks), and create / return even
more value to
shareholders.
If Vivendi sees a chance to increase
shareholder value by purchasing Ubisoft, then
more power to them.
Shareholders including
power tower pioneer Brightsource Energy as well as General Electric, which will provide the turbine, want to build
more such towers around the world.
This document can also provide a
more equal distribution of
power, so that if you are a minority
shareholder, you can use an Investors Agreement to help protect your best interests.
Yet if it wanted to truly unpack the expansive
power of network effects, opening up the tokens to a true, decentralized blockchain system and, eventually, a decentralized market could result in far
more explosive growth - and, by extension, token - based returns for Facebook's
shareholders.
Yet if it wanted to truly unpack the expansive
power of network effects, opening up the tokens to a true, decentralized blockchain system and, eventually, a decentralized market could result in far
more explosive growth — and, by extension, token - based returns for Facebook's
shareholders.