This means that China, for example, isn't
more a socialist country and not a country of mixed economy.
Not exact matches
Mainly the
socialist social programs of the U.S. will (
more) rapidly bankrupt the
country if the U.S. government can't continue to print dollars to inflate it's way out of it's incredible mountain of debt.
In August 1972,
more than a year before the military coup, the CIA funded a 300 - page economic blueprint which it supplied to the
country's military and some of the most ambitious business families in an effort to hasten the overthrow of Salvador Allende's
socialist government, which had been elected by a small plurality in 1970.
The capitalist system is not perfect — but you have to admit that
more different peoples see hope in the US than the
socialist countries of Europe or Latin America...
Actally if you closely examine Jesus in the Bible, you have a person who would be much
more comfortable in a
socialist country with a government run healthcare system.
At the moment the
country is being lead by the
socialist fools and that somehow scares me
more than the right wing fanaticals.
So they want to leave because of a «
socialist» healthcare system, and go to a
country that has an even
MORE «
socialist» healthcare system.
Most immigrants from
socialist countries are fare
more exposed to
more cultures and even ethnicities than most hardcore Western liberals (I lived on 3 continents and visited 4, you?)
More so than some, nominally
socialist,
countries.
Philip Blonde takes an almost Democratic Republican ideology towards public service reform in advocating using social entreprises to manage schools, hospitals, sure start centres etc, which would be democratically connected to all other schools etc through out the
country and collectively elect the central management who allocate budget spending to each and every school etc. http://www.respublica.org.uk/publications/ownership-state It sounds
more like a radical libertarian
socialist solution to public services than a free market conservative solution to public services.
What's
more, in comparison to previous governments, it suffers from a substantial problem in the shape of Plahotniuc, who suffers from the lowest levels of popular support of any political figure in the
country, but nevertheless maintains large levels of influence in the media and has a close relationship with both decision - makers in Bucharest and the
Socialist Party in Chisinau.
Given that China still claims to be a
socialist economy and Western
countries do not, it is hardly surprising that China is
more willing and able to enact such policies.
Most first world
countries are moving
more socialist every year.
The
country is seen as steeped in queasy Communist kitsch,
more socialist saccharine than
socialist re...
The
country is seen as steeped in queasy Communist kitsch,
more socialist saccharine than
socialist re...
more
What is surprising, however, is that there are those who - despite all the news, documentaries, journalism, research and literature today openly available to anyone interested to learn
more - believe that Finland is a «completely
socialist country» where its children are educated by the State rather than parents, that the vast majority of children don't get enough school education their parents (if they can afford it) have to buy proper education for their children, that resources are not distributed equitably to all, and that all schools are unionized.
But at the time the newspapers were full of reports from Mr. Palmer's office that new evidence of a gigantic plot against the safety of the
country had been unearthed; and although the steel strike was failing, the coal strike was failing, and any danger of a
socialist régime, to say nothing of a revolution, was daily fading, nevertheless to the great mass of the American people the Bolshevist bogey became
more terrifying than ever.
Spawned by their
more formal Western predecessors and motivated by the forces of history and politics, the newer incarnations of the biennial often occur in the cities of the postcolonial world and the Global South, as well as in former
socialist countries.
Touching on the efforts to repeal Obamacare, Summers noted that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was built on a conservative approach to providing universal health coverage rather than the
more socialist models in effect in
countries like Great Britain and Canada.