So, we know that weakening northerly winds and
a more stable atmosphere are important ingredients for severe haze episodes.
Not exact matches
Because cells incorporate carbon from the
atmosphere into their DNA as they divide, the proportion of carbon - 14 to the
more stable carbon isotope carbon - 12 acts as a time stamp for when a cell was born.
Every spring in the high Arctic,
stable mercury in the air gets converted to a
more reactive form that drops out of the
atmosphere.
As less radiation reaches the surface, the
atmosphere may become
more stable and clouds
more persistent than usual, and less water will evaporate from the surface, a finding corroborated by Qian's China study.
Many fungi consume carbon in the soil, converting it into a
more stable form; however, a portion of the consumed carbon is unavoidably respired as carbon dioxide to the
atmosphere.
The process transforms the biological matter into a
more stable form of carbon, slowing the release cycle and thereby keeping
more carbon out of the
atmosphere.
One of the leading hypotheses is that while warming throughout the
atmosphere can make it
more stable (bad news for tornadoes), it also means the
atmosphere can hold
more moisture (good news for tornadoes).
Poor countries say industrial powers, which have spent a century or
more benefiting from fossil fuels while adding billions of tons of heat - trapping greenhouse gases to the
atmosphere, owe them both financial assistance in dealing with rising seas or shifting rains and a
stable climate, which they say can be achieved only if rich countries commit to deep prompt cuts in their emissions.
In
atmosphere having an accuracy of 0.005 C would probably be of little value, but in the ocean temperatures are much
more stable and temperature differentials smaller.
Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot
more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively
stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower
atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.
The planet's
atmosphere was surely so vast and
stable that outside forces, ranging from human activity to volcanic eruptions, could have no
more than a local and temporary effect.
If anything else tries to disturb the temperature (or
more accurately energy content) derived from those 3 characteristics alone then all one sees is a change in circulation adjusting the flow of energy throughput to keep top of
atmosphere radiative balance
stable.
On the other hand, an isothermal
atmosphere is a
stable state and won't mix spontaneously unless you stir it by some means, but that is true of all stratified states, not just isothermal, but temperature inversions that are even
more stable.
Knutson and Tuleya (2004) show that climate models run with increasing CO2 project that in the tropics the
atmosphere should become
more stable as there is
more warming aloft than at the surface.
Given there is much
more water vapour in the lower levels of the
atmosphere, the study really found that there was a decline in overall global relative humidity when global warming theory suggests it should stay
more - or-less
stable.
The tropopause is the boundary between the lowest layer of the
atmosphere» the turbulently mixed troposphere» and the
more stable stratosphere.
While excess carbon in the
atmosphere is toxic to life, we are, after all, carbon - based life forms, and returning
stable carbon to the soil can help us grow
more food faster.