Not exact matches
Developers of public health guidelines have been adopting
systematic review methods and
more structured methods for grading recommendations; assessing
bias in the reviews is a critical step in the process [7, 38, 39].
«Using
more sophisticated physics and powerful super-computers, we managed to remove the
systematic biases that plague traditional modeling and have previously led to false identifications of the 6Li / 7Li isotopic signature.»
In fact, we revealed that lean participants from the different studies varied
more in their levels of Firmicutes than did the lean and obese individuals within each study, pointing to
systematic biases and biological differences across the study populations.
Improbable though it may seem, research by University of Chicago psychologists has shown that people are less prone to
biases like excessive aversion to losses and
more apt to make
systematic and rational decisions when a choice is presented to them in a foreign language rather than their native tongue.
This is not simply the uncertainty in estimating the linear trend, but the
more systematic uncertainty due to processing problems, drifts and other
biases.
Thus, when there is a
systematic bias (not just random variation), creating a positive covariance between the error values, you can calculate differences much
more accurately than the uncertainty in individual values.