Sentences with phrase «more texts about»

Not exact matches

That's because Generation Z has been less about face - to - face communications — they more commonly communicate via text, emoji and video — and they're unprepared for a field such as customer service, where they could interact with irate people.

Instead of handing over a text - intensive user manual, Tour My App invites them to learn more about how to use the software the first time they log in.

Because there was a lot more space on the desktop, we thought about how we could add complex menus and a ton of information and graphics and text.

«One thing that surprised me about my communication with Jarvis is that when I have the choice of either speaking or texting, I text much more than I would have expected,» he wrote.

Instead, breaking up the text with images and videos will help grab viewers» attention while telling them more about your product, Rubin advises.

The small sampling of participants, who frequently texted or incessantly checked their social - media accounts, were more concerned about superficial things.

Without seeing the text, the Congressional Budget Office scored the «skinny» plan Wednesday night and found that it would leave about 16 million more Americans without health insurance.

He spoke about the transition from text to visual in online sharing, with more people using video to express themselves on the internet.

• Be the first to know about NEW DELICIOUS PRODUCTS • Be the first to know about SPECIAL SALES • Receive DISCOUNT offers • BIRTHDAY Specials • Text offers & MORE!

Instead, try to keep your anchor text natural by spreading it across your inbound links in the right proportions (more about this below).

SEO is about more than meta tags, title tags, and targeted anchor text.

If you do not immediately recognize the debt a collector has identified or if you want to find out more about the debt before you pay it, you may use this sample letter text to request more information.

Text analytics have been used by companies for years, but most people do not think about how they can apply text analytics to make their employees» social interactions more effective or efficiText analytics have been used by companies for years, but most people do not think about how they can apply text analytics to make their employees» social interactions more effective or efficitext analytics to make their employees» social interactions more effective or efficient.

Instead, use your anchor text naturally, such as with a phrase like, «you can learn more about link building here,» or even simpler with «according to AudienceBloom...»

There's quite a bit of evidence that Google looks for structure in your blog post — the more structure, the higher you rank (see this article by Yoast for more about text structure and SEO)

Using a pay - per - click budget wisely is about more than a careful selection of keywords and sticking to tried and tested advert text.

In this improved version, the anchor text is far more relevant, giving Google valuable clues about what the link leads to — in other words, what the page we want to rank in the SERPs is about.

For example, maybe one page mentions «low cost car insurance» in passing, but those words could be included in the text of a link to another page on your site or blog that goes into more detail about the pros and cons of low cost car insurance policies.

How about that descriptive text link, maybe it could be more enticing?

As we've learned from the best practices around both inbound and outbound links, anchor text that includes relevant keywords that more clearly indicate what the linked content is about is best for crawlers.

Companies in the EU can go to the European Commission CETA page with information about what each country exports to Canada, how to navigate the new tariff laws, how to contact the export promotion agency in each EU country, the full CETA text, and more.

Shopping at the supermarket and wandering around the aisles teaches a lot more about how to write effective pay - per - click (PPC) advertisement text than we might...

With more than a hint of exasperation, Scalia concludes: «One will search in vain the document we are supposed to be construing for text that provides the basis for the argument over these distinctions; and will find in our society's tradition regarding abortion no hint that the distinctions are constitutionally relevant, much less any indication how a constitutional argument about them ought to be resolved.

But you know a lot less about the Bible than Biblical Scholars who have studied the original, Aramiac, Greek and Hebrew texts and a lot more learned and educated than you and still believe: guys like Fr.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

It is difficult to listen to a text when there are other texts in the room talking about the same subject matter, often in ways more elaborate and more familiar.

Even though only about 9 % of female characters have names in the text, there are more than one hundred «eleventy» (111) women's names that are preserved.

I think there is much more going on in the OT violent texts than simply that humans were wrong about what God wanted.

We're not given much more in the text about this man, except that he was willing to talk straight to the Jewish authorities when they questioned him, and that Jesus later told him to stop sinning, implying that he had been a wrongdoer.

The text goes on to tell us more about the king's actions beginning in verse 2:

Yet there is something even more important about this text than just looking for the second return of Jesus.

By that he meant that, had the founding happened before about 1770 or after 1805, the controlling texts of our constitutional order would have been much more explicitly Christian in character.

I bet many young ministers preparing sermons on these texts are more embarrassed by the word about the kingdom of heaven than they are by those promising possession of the land.

This text may do more to witness to trinitarian faith than a stereotyped doxology does, though hymnal indexes rarely list it among hymns about the Trinity.

One more would be to pray through the text over and over again as you go about your day.

The more I read about it, it sounds like a real religion, which is much superior compared to the old Islamic text.

Nevertheless, Paul's statements about homosexuality call for a more serious wrestling with the texts than do his ideas about women's hair.

Maybe more than ever, the students displayed the «competency» about being able to argue intelligently based on their own reading of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, and of being able to integrate particular arguments from the text in their own «comparative narratives.»

And yes, Bill P, if the «End Religions» of the world were more educated about things like «voluntary servitude» as a synonym for «slavery» in the Bible, they might understand the library of ancient texts that they continue to deride.

Although the «text» I wrote above is not the Bible, I understand a little more clearly now what NP talked about: the Bible can be the object of misinterpretation, and people are the victims.

They read with reverence, humility, obedience and the presumption that difficulty in understanding reveals more about their limitations than the excellence or effectiveness of the text.

This makes much more sense of the text, the chronology, and prophecies about the death of Jesus, and a wide variety of other factors.

Tomorrow we will look at some other tricky texts about baptism that become more clear when we understand the definition of baptism as «immersion into» or «identified with.»

Ford described himself during these meetings as invariably wedded to some single «correct» or self - evident interpretation of a line of Whitehead's text, whereupon John would gently, dialectically, raise questions about possible alternatives that, as Ford would subsequently admit, seemed more in keeping with interpretations of other passages to which Ford himself had, in preceding weeks, assented.

I sometimes think these documentary theories are nothing more than scholarly inventions to give scholars something to write about who have become bored with the biblical text itself.

To learn more about the title «Christ,» and the meaning of other texts that use this term, take the Lesson on Christ in my Gospel Dictionary online course.

I could go on and on about more of the arguments surrounding this text, but let's leave it aside for now.

My point about the bible is that I don't necessarily think that it is MORE important than all other religious / spiritual texts.

The question requires us to be tough and honest about the text and about the texture of our life that is more problematic than the king's pageant intends or acknowledges.

Here, no doubt, lies one reason for the theological interest in «verifiable facts about Jesus of Nazareth: «they are needed, it will be said, to regulate the christological pluralism of the New Testament, and, still more, to restrain the subjectivism that imposes fantasy on the text.