Sentences with phrase «more than a minute per»

Not exact matches

According to dental health website AsktheDentist.com, sonic toothbrushes, which oscillate at astonishing rates — up to 31,000 strokes per minute at full speed — are more effective at reaching and removing plaque between the teeth and beneath the gum line than rotating electric toothbrushes, making a sonic toothbrush the best bet for anyone with gum issues, those who are lackadaisical about flossing, and the majority of people over age 40.

, sonic toothbrushes, which oscillate at astonishing rates — up to 31,000 strokes per minute at full speed — are more effective at reaching and removing plaque between the teeth and beneath the gum line than rotating electric toothbrushes, making a sonic toothbrush the best bet for anyone with gum issues, those who are lackadaisical about flossing, and the majority of people over age 40.

The average person needs 8.25 hours of sleep per day — 95 minutes more than that average person actually gets.

An Edison Research study on the audio habits of Americans found that podcast listeners are actually «super listeners,» consuming more than one hour and 45 minutes of audio per day than the average American, and they spend more than 25 percent of their total audio time listening to podcasts.

With just 57 employees this cloud - communications platform — which supports more than 20 million call center minutes per month — grew its three - year revenue 544 percent, to $ 22.5 million in 2014.

For example, I learned that I generate more meetings per minute cold calling than attending networking events, unless I had an active speaking role.

I get 10 megabits of Internet data per second on my cable modem, 400 minutes a month of cell phone time, and more than 200 channels of TV, along with all the Wi - Fi my laptop can pick up.

Americans are spending over 73 minutes per day watching digital video, up more than 7 % from last year, according to eMarketer data.

Feedback involves two to six reviewers per week, and takes each of them no more than 15 minutes.

People Are Facebooking» ing — and - Buying More Than Even, Even if They Don't Realize It Although a Reuters study released last week asserted that 34 % of people believe they are using Facebook less than they were 6 month ago, Nielsen DATA shows that usage is actually up 18 minutes per moThan Even, Even if They Don't Realize It Although a Reuters study released last week asserted that 34 % of people believe they are using Facebook less than they were 6 month ago, Nielsen DATA shows that usage is actually up 18 minutes per mothan they were 6 month ago, Nielsen DATA shows that usage is actually up 18 minutes per month.

But this is the number of people who watch only 15 minutes per week or more, and 15 minutes per week is not very much when the average viewer spends more than 30 hours per week watching TV.

Other places get more hits per minute than both CNN and Fox combined.

These little guys don't need any more than 1 minute per side to cook through.

According to the report, «short - term sharing» and «short - term video» are exploding among online users, with products like Dropcam seeing more videos uploaded per minute than YouTube.

During the past six years, pork use has grown on a per pound basis by more than double chicken, largely due to foodservice operators seeking higher quality cuts and cooking them to 145 degrees Fahrenheit (with a three - minute rest).

That's more than 21 pigs per minute, making QPP one of the fastest pig - killing facilities in the nation.

Capable of industry - leading speeds of up to 300 bags per minute, the new tna ropac 5 broke new grounds in engineering excellence and innovation by more than doubling the industry's maximum case packing speeds.

To be allowed to continue the race, a horse must have a pulse rate of no higher than 60 and a respiration rate of no more than 48 breaths per minute.

The Pelicans are more than nine points per 100 possessions tougher to score on when Jrue Holiday is on the court, and Holiday has played 1,000 more minutes than Gobert.

Their rate of 8.99 power play goals per 60 minutes more than doubles the Predators» 4.32 PP goals per 60.

He received plenty of minutes (33.1 per game), and also the chance to dribble the ball more than he'd had in the past.

Even with his ailing legs, the Blue Devils leaned heavily on Curry; he logged more than 32 minutes per game, mostly at shooting guard.

John Calipari has an undefeated, No. 1 — ranked team, and as he told his Wildcats earlier today, «People» — as in, those who forecasted various degrees of ego - driven implosion — «are going crazy» that their platoon experiment, with swapping, five - man units and nine NBA prospects playing no more than 25 minutes per game, is working.

It's like ROR's production per 60 is going to be negatively impacted by playing 8 minutes more than everyone else on the forward lines.

He scored more goals btw per minute than anyone.

When point guard Chauncey Billups arrived in Denver last November after being traded from the Pistons for Allen Iverson, he advised his new coaches not to play him more than 36 minutes per game in the regular season lest he wear down in May and June.

In 1985 his resting pulse was measured at more than 150 beats per minute, his electrocardiogram showed signs of atrial fibrillation, and his steroid usewas out of control.

As the Czech has made 11 more league appearances than the Belgian since August 2015, clocking up over 1,000 more minutes of action, our analysis has been made on a per minute, per game and per goal conceded basis.

Although Cech has conceded more goals than Courtois since he joined Arsenal (56 to 45), the 34 - year - old in fact edges the Belgian on a per minute basis, having conceded a goal every 92 minute's to Courtois» 91 minutes.

I find it fascinating that he has a better FT % than bolden, better TS %, better EFG %, reasonably close other numbers in a per minute status, he has more points scored this year compared to Bolden in about 300 less minutes (about 2/3 the minutes).

But better yet, according to some stats turned up by Yarone Arbel, Galis averaged more minutes per game than there are minutes in a game.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

In fact his 3036 EPL minutes this season is more than three times what he managed in his debut year and over 1000 more than last time and if you convert his stats to an average per 90 minutes his top stats are all from 2013/14.

Adams is averaging 12.5 points, 12.1 rebounds and more than two blocks per 36 minutes.

The fact is, Giroud scored more goals from open play per minute played than any other Premier League player except Sergio Aguero.

He also had 40 blocked shots, a figure surpassed by only four other guards — Clyde Drexler, Julius Erving, Michael Cooper and Marques Johnson, who are more like forwards — and totaled more minutes per game than all but three NBA backcourt men.

It's the lack of goals which has left doubt in Arsenal fans mind as to his real ability, but his goal - per - minute ration has always been more than respectable, even if he has had the odd barren spell.

Giroud scored more per minute from open play last year than everyone in the league except Sergio Aguero.

If your going to look at stats of strikers then goals per minute is a more important stat than anything else.

As well as that, it may surprise you to know that, with a rate of 0.7 a game, the former Montpellier man has scored more non-penalty goals per 90 minutes in the league than players like Thomas Muller, Cristiano Ronaldo and Antoine Griezmann, and he's not far off Lionel Messi's tally of 0.74 per game.

The game peaked with an 18.8 rating from 11:30 to 11:45 p.m. ET, and it recorded an average of 537,000 viewers streaming the game per minute, with more than 2.1 million unique viewers.

Sanchez get more goals and assist for arsenal in 3 years than 10 of walcott... and do nt start with that thay he is winger, alexis plays on the wing too... and trackback too, defends, create, and most importat, he wipe the f shirt while walcott is walking in the park taking a cup of tea... but yeah, «he has more goals per minute»... what an as **....

He had less game time last season than the one before that so using 2015 - 16 as his benchmark, only Kos surpasses him as Per despite more games / minutes wasn't as assured.

For example, goals conceded per 90 minutes played Ospina 0.61 Courtois 0.96 In other words, Courtois concedes 50 % more goals per 90 minutes played than Ospina.

Vardy, Lukaku, Aguero, Jesus, Firminho, Morata and Kane have all on average played more minutes per game than Lacazette and all played more 90 min or near 90 min matches.

The other top strikers have had more minutes per match than Lacazette.

The Wolf Pack's four top scorers and their three top rebounders are on their second stops as college players, and among non-transfers, Hall is the only active one averaging more than seven minutes per game.

I think Howedes would only come in if he was guaranteed more playing time than Per, which at the minute isn't likely.

It bore down on defense, which led to a 17 - 0 run over almost six minutes, against a very quick and skilled Carondelet, who averaged more than 70 points per game during the regular season.

For one thing, only a handful of players — most of them superstars such as Michael Jordan, Karl Ma - lone, David Robinson, Barkley, Clyde Drexler and Kevin Johnson — get to the line more often than Marciulionis, and only the Mailman shoots more free throws per minutes played.