All three of these boast reasons to own that are
more than rational justifications.
We all use them when meeting someone for the first time, and research shows that interviewers rely on
these more than rational analysis when assessing a candidate.
Unlike some sort of weird belief system, or «atheists» that many christians want to make it out to be, «science» is nothing
more than the rational, logical observation and study of the world around us.
If it turns out that we are
more than rational beings with interests, and that we make claims (sometimes angrily) based on honor and the need for recognition, then consent and deliberation that ignores more poignant spurs to action than mere interest will often fall short.
Greider, a senior journalist at the Nation, and Wight, an economist at the University of Richmond, understand that capitalism is more than a technical economic system and that it is supported by
more than rational argument.
There is the anxious self which is something
more than a rational soul dealing with a recalcitrant body.
To obey Paul's command for your children means giving
them more than a rational faith — it means also giving them a well - formed Christian imagination that can look at a starry night sky and see more than the infinite reach of empty space and the eternal stretch of endless time, that can «keep seeking the things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God» (3:1).
Not exact matches
This recommendation comes from finance professor Anat Admati, who says: «Economists tend to think that beliefs and behavior are guided by incentives and
rational processing of information, but I know that there is
more to it
than this simple model, and that other disciplines have much to say.
Pedego store owners «are
more mature and, I think,
more rational»
than younger business owners, says CEO DiCostanzo, an electric - vehicle zealot who is on his third Tesla.
Which doesn't make it any
more rational or sensible, because whether you're in Paris, Tokyo or Tashkent, you are
more more liable to be killed by a car
than to be victimized by terrorism.
While it doesn't always make strictly
rational financial sense — if you have a 3.5 percent mortgage but can earn 7 or 8 percent from investing, putting extra money towards your mortgage does result in opportunity cost — the emotional impact could
more than offset that «loss.»
«In my experience people who assert statements like that are often immune to evidence or
rational argument, and envision themselves as superior beings who are
more enlightened
than the rest of us.»
Matt Ridley, for example, in his recent book, The
Rational Optimist, argues that the oil sands are a much
more sane solution to current energy needs
than things like wind (too unreliable and too little output) and biofuels (wasteful use of land).
Investing is
more of an emotional
than intellectual exercise, and it becomes very hard to stay on an even keel and to make
rational, unbiased judgements if you're making them based on someone else's information.
Although the valuation of the market is not as stretched today as it was in the late 1990s, investors» exuberance is also arguably
more rational than it was then.»
For BtoB startups — cost reduction or increasing the sales are the only two most important reasons why customers buy product as their decision are
more rational than individuals who may buy the product for variety of other reasons.
If the company is sold for $ 10M to $ 20M, the holders of Series A would still receive $ 1.00 / share as a
rational Series A holder would never convert his / her shares to common as the Series A holder would receive
more from the Series A liquidation preference
than as a holder of common.
With a
more levelheaded approach to precious metal investing
than the traditional «gold bug,» Luke Burgess has proven that
rational thinking in a largely emotional market can be incredibly profitable.
Liu He, a Chinese vice premier and economic adviser to President Xi Jinping, told Steven Mnuchin, the American Treasury secretary, in a phone call just
more than a week ago that the two countries should «stay
rational and work together to maintain the overall stability of their economic and trade relations.»
However, after spending time reading your articles for about
more than a month, I am quite happy to say that your advices are
rational and not coloured.
If there was no volatility, and we knew stocks went up 8 % every year, the only
rational response would be to pay
more for them, until they were expensive enough to return less
than 8 %.
The loudest factions of Christianity and atheism aren't the largest, which presents the occasion for mutual understanding: open, honest, introspective and
rational discussion between groups of people who share
more in common
than not.
Your opinion that it's a «
rational» way to see the world is just that — nothing
more than you're opinion.
Humans,
more rationalizing
than rational, have devolved modernity into rationalized lust.
Consider this: supposedly, something like 35 % of us have had transcendental experiences and these experiences resonate «Truth» in a way that is far
more intimate
than our
rational / sensory - based experiences.
Also, both can be
rational thinkers, but one may have
more information
than the other, so their conclusion will not be the same.
No I do not accept that women as a whole are
more vindictive
than men, nor do I accept that men as a whole are
more level - headed and
rational than women.
If you wish to convince any
rational person of the validity of your bible, you'll have to come up with a little bit
more than what you've got.
That proof probably wouldn't be enough for those who believe that they are
more «
rational»
than everyone else.
that's probably the most reasonable and
rational thing ever said on these blogs, however clearly
more «christians» (i'm laughing at those who call themselves christians) concern themselves
more about the lives of others
than leading their own moral life.
Agnosticism is inherently
more rational than Atheist «Specific Non-Belief».
For example, there are
more irrational numbers
than rational numbers.
It's
more than something logic can not explain, it's something there simply is no
rational reason to believe.
You have always sounded fairly
rational to me William, though anyone pretending to be William is showing themselves to be no
more mature
than a 5th grader.
I'm sure you can type a long and boring argument that shows you think it is, but there is
more to life
than being
rational.
If you think that pink unicorns are
more irrational
than your god, there may be little hope for a
rational discussion.
But — nobody in that church leadership group said anything at all after the comment about men being
more reasonable
than women and women being emotional and not
rational.»
Based on his long collaboration with Hans Urs von Balthasar, Joseph Ratzinger was able to capture the essence of his friend's theological aesthetics in this single, lapidary line: «Being overcome by the beauty of Christ is a
more real,
more profound knowledge
than mere
rational deduction.»
a
more honest and
rational answer
than «God did it.»?
I'm not saying the unnecessary suffering of animals is good, or moral, but rather pointing out that your perspective on the subject is no
more rational, no
more based on fact,
than that of the people you are arguing against.
The
rational conclusion seems to be that we are
more than just bodies,
more than just animals.
«Lewis wrote in a time when, among the educated British public if not among their professional philosophers, there was considerably
more agreement
than there is now about what constitutes a valid and
rational argument for a given case.»
Even if, in some sense, I exist, I don't know what I am — and it turns out, so some modern materialists have begun to argue — that nothing I do or even say and think is
more than the motion of material parts (and so subvert even the notion of
rational argument itself).
Christ is both Icon of the Father (who is thus revealed as being far
more than a merely
rational super-being) and true Man, the real peak and summit of all creation, and exemplar of man, who will one day gather up all the diverse workings of the Holy Spirit and present them as a glorious symphony in the presence of Our Father in heaven.
If you would like to, I for one would be
more than willing to wipe the slate clean and have a calm
rational discussion with you either here, or if you can ask David for my email address if you would prefer to talk privately.
The followers of Whitehead who take his imagery literally without pondering this important insight are inclined to be
more rationalistic
than Whitehead intended, and
than the method of
rational empiricism requires.
It is tempting simply to show where Luke has got it wrong, but there is
more than reason at work and simply winning a
rational argument is not enough.
Your beliefs are no
more rational than those of a five year old in the Tooth Fairy.
As you remember, the seventeenth - century genius Blaise Pascal proposed that it is
more rational, in view of the benefits to be gained, to believe that God exists
than to believe he does not exist.
He was the bishop of Myra around 300CE (so a 5 year old has a
more rational belief
than christians do).