But that does not mean that God desires the salvation of the poor
more than the salvation of the rich.
I seem to be missing the gene that makes me seek
more than salvation — I don't know what «closer to Jesus» means.
Not exact matches
= > There is no necessity for the flood story to be anything
more than a massive collection of spiritual truths that explain relationship between God and man, good and evil, life and death all in accordance with the plan of creation for the
salvation of souls.
The atheist who claims to come from a «faith» background is extremely confused and
more to be pitied
than admired.Had the supposed «believer» continued in the «faith» they claim to have forsaken, they would ultimately have appeared before God and been rejected.These were deceived, they never met God, they never knew God and they never understood God.They are devoid of the Truth and twice lost.There is hope while they still breathe Gods gift of life that they might someday meet and be reconciled to God, but their lying nature makes
salvation less likely.Debate with them is an exercise in futility.God bless
That is
more pathetic
than believing that mankind tends toward error and needs
salvation.
The flood story touches on just about every aspect of God and
salvation and I want it to be
more than spiritual.
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal
salvation» as
more important
than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything
more, except put money when the basket is passed.
The
salvation of a single soul, he says, is worth
more than all the poetry, drama and tragedy ever written.
I do want to say that I am glad that we have
more than just Peter to get the whole picture on
salvation — we have the whole Bible.
It sounds interesting and I would be curious to see what prompted your change and how you now view some of the passages in Scripture dealing with election with a
more of «missional» focus rather
than one of individualized
salvation.
In other words, «neither slave nor free, Jew nor Greek, male nor female» has to mean something
more than shared access to
salvation.
D. Martyn Lloyd - Jones (1899 - 1981)[in an excerpt from Romans: The New Man, An Exposition of Chapter 6, Banner of Truth, 1972] said: There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of
salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the
more to the glory of grace.
My disagreements with the five points of both Calvinism and Arminianism iare not exactly with their theology or understanding of Biblical texts, but with something much
more basic
than that: their definition of certain biblical words and theological ideas, such as election, grace,
salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, etc, etc..
And I'm not saying that signs and wonders are
more important
than salvation.
It is now experienced
more as the established orthodoxy
than as the hope of the world's
salvation.
Having grown up in the conservative evangelical subculture that cast
salvation as little
more than a ticket out of hell that you cash in on Judgment Day, I've personally been enthralled and challenged by the emerging church's perspective on the Kingdom of God.
But it has taught one reader, at least,
more than many sermons about the potential of intercession, about the possible workings of redemption beyond the grave, and about the ways of
salvation and damnation.
They were, however,
more concerned with the emotional experience of
salvation by a sudden conversion
than they were with theological dogmas.
True, the sanctification process of Christianity is much
more difficult
than living for yourself; however, resting in the
salvation / justification / presence of God benefits of Christianity brings joy.
For the self - realization of the formerly anonymous Christianity is demanded, first, by the incarnational and social structure of grace and Christianity, and, secondly, by the fact that a clearer and
more reflected comprehension of Christianity offers a greater chance of
salvation to the individual
than his status as an anonymous Christian.
In fact, I would argue that the Bible actually has
more support for an inclusive view of
salvation than it has for an exclusive view of
salvation.
a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no
more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer
salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)
But if he has been answering the prayers could they start praying for a cure for cancer and the genetic code of algae that make gasoline and how to grow food in salty soil and lots of other stuff that is
more important
than mankind's
salvation?
The daily act of «working out my
salvation» is
more than just believing a statement of personal redemption; it's about partnering with God in the things that were important to Jesus.
The gospel is
more encompassing
than just a personal
salvation message (western Christianity often focuses too heavily on individualism) and this definition reminds me how broad the impact was of Christ's time on earth.
Once you realize that the Bible does not purport to be a textbook of science, the old controversy between religion and science vanishes... The doctrine of the Trinity is much
more abstruse
than anything in relativity or quantum mechanics; but, being necessary for
salvation, the doctrine is stated in the Bible.
Your sins are already forgiven, no one goes to Hell because they did not ask for forgiveness, a person goes to Hell because when they have passed the age of innocence, and have come to the Knowledge of the Gospel, or they have learned that Jesus died for their sins, and that He gives us
salvation freely because He loves us
more than we love ourselves, and we have to make a choice to accept or reject this free gift, if that individual accepts Jesus as their Savior, then they go to Heaven, and if that individual rejects Jesus, then they go to Hell.
Now,
more than ever, is the day of
salvation for Muslims, and we must make every effort to offer Muslims an alternative to the grim realities that they face every day.
I presume they are
more mindful of modesty
than of
salvation, like those who contract a disease in the
more shameful parts of the body and shun making themselves known to the physicians; and thus they perish along with their own bashfulness» (Repentance 10:1 [A.D. 203]-RRB-.
Such a biblical understanding provides a
more fruitful base for reflecting on the use of power
than does
salvation history, with its stress on human powerlessness.
One can also derive from the Bible, at least from the New Testament, the idea that the
salvation of the soul is incomparably
more important
than the well being of the body.
Craig both seventh day and anglican are believers they are saved by faith in the death of Jesus Christ and they believe in the forgiveness of sins sactification and the resurection at Christs return.This is what i meant regarding theology one has to be careful otherwise you exclude groups of christians because some of there other theology may not be the same as ours.They still hold to the central truths of the bible but have differences ie like sabbaths or baptism but that does not mean they arent saved or are christians.What church denomination do you belong to if you mentioned jehovah witness or mormons that is a different story as they do nt believe that Jesus Christ is central to there faith they have relegated him to nothing
more than a prophet so there is no
salvation in those religions.brentnz
In the way leading from one age of solitude to the next, «each solitude is colder and stricter
than the preceding, and
salvation from it
more difficult.»
Still, it is good to remember that history, even
salvation history, as Levering seems to suggest, is never
more than an instrument to eschatological purpose.
Niebuhr was at one with the Social Gospel in caring much
more about social justice
than about his own or anyone else's individual
salvation.
The Kingdom of God was seen
more as a principle of judgment on every society
than as a realizable ideal that could be identified with the
salvation that Christians seek.
Here the ethic, which in Buddhism is also identical with the teaching of
salvation — perhaps even
more than it had been in the Brahmanic system — has much
more latitude; it has a task that is metaphysically meaningful — suspending at one point the cosmic law, unraveling it, as it were.
I have always found it very strange that these who call themselves successors of the apostles, I mean some poor men — preachers of humility and repentance — should possess great wealth, wallow in luxery, and fill posts
more proper to satisfy the vanity of the age and the ostentation of the great
than to occupy men who must meditate on the nothingness of human life and on the quest for
salvation.
If it really has been «done to death,» then I can think of numerous topics that have been done many times
more than this topic (at least where I'm at and interact): faith, hope, love, prayer, fellowship, giving, good works, christian unity,
salvation, grace, faith healing, being culturally relevant, the gospel, the resurrection, religion vs. relationship, tithing, worship, reverence, christian music, legalism, old vs. new covenant, Paul's conversion, miracles, gifts of the spirit, sign gifts, tongues, nativity, the disciples, crucifixion, materialism, mysticism, new age, atheism, i could probably list about 50
more if I thought about it.
Han Wenzao pointed out that such a stance requires a broader and
more social theology of
salvation than the church espoused prior to the 1949 liberation.
That message, as billions around the world have heard for
more than six decades, is
salvation and the need to live a new life because of Christ's sacrifice on the cross.
Consequently, there's
more than one path to spiritual
salvation - similar to what Unitarian Universalists believe.
It could be argued that original sin and
salvation are a manufactured problem - solution that has caused
more harm
than good.
His explanation of
salvation, while correct in that the usage concerns
more than the afterlife, falls way short of the multifaceted meaning found in the Bible (e.g. the late John Stott's book The Cross of Christ).
It was important to say at that time that the church's rituals could not be linked in such a direct fashion to the
salvation of the soul without putting a weight on the individual that was
more than he or she could bear.
But even
more than that is needed, both for the sake of theology and for
salvation of the world.
These are only two of many examples, but they are
more than enough to show that the Roman Catholic Church does indeed add requirements, beyond simple faith, for
salvation.
Jainism stresses,
more than either Buddhism or Hinduism, ascetic practice as a way to
salvation, and its insistence on the principle of non-injury, Ahimsa, is
more absolute and far - reaching
than that of any segment of Hinduism or Buddhism which also hold it.
By the end of the Assembly, as Kenneth Slack pointed out, «most of the members felt that there was
more danger from undue stress on the evangelism of individuals
than the other way round, despite widely expressed anxiety, given expression by Stott, that liberation in political, social and economic sense was in danger of replacing
salvation from sin at the heart of the redeeming gospel».73 There was no doubt that, despite the narrowing of the range of disagreements, important differences continued, especially with regard to the meaning of
salvation and the program of dialogue with people of other faiths.
Scores of passages come to our minds: «Joy unspeakable and full of glory»; «Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, for he hath visited and redeemed his people»; «Thanks be to God who giveth us the victory»; «Mine eyes have seen thy
salvation»; «We are
more than conquerors»; «We rejoice in the hope of the glory of God»; «Thanks be to God for his unspeakable gift»; «Thanks be to God who causeth us to triumph in Christ»; «God who commanded the light to shine out of darkness hath shined in our hearts.»