Sentences with phrase «more than the current yield»

Why is the yield on cost so much more than the current yield?

Not exact matches

These behavioral finance influences can skew a portfolio's overall allocations toward an overemphasis of potentially higher - yielding equities that in some instances may represent more downside risk than upside potential at current valuation levels.

Yield quotations more closely reflect the current earnings of money market funds than the total return quotations.

The one - day loss for many funds, including Vanguard Total Bond Market, iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond, Pimco Total Return and Metropolitan West Total Return, while less than a half a percentage point, still amounted to more than 10 percent of their current yield.

As usual, I don't place too much emphasis on this sort of forecast, but to the extent that I make any comments at all about the outlook for 2006, the bottom line is this: 1) we can't rule out modest potential for stock appreciation, which would require the maintenance or expansion of already high price / peak earnings multiples; 2) we also should recognize an uncomfortably large potential for market losses, particularly given that the current bull market has now outlived the median and average bull, yet at higher valuations than most bulls have achieved, a flat yield curve with rising interest rate pressures, an extended period of internal divergence as measured by breadth and other market action, and complacency at best and excessive bullishness at worst, as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weakness.

The current yield of 1.55 % might not be massive like AT&T's dividend (which is why we diversify, and it's why I'm listing 10 different stocks with different dynamics here), but Walt Disney more than makes up for that via strong dividend growth: the five - year dividend growth rate is 30.1 %, which is one of the higher rates you'll run across.

As Mr Draghi said in his press conference today, the bank will be buying bonds with a negative yield of no more than -0.2 pc (which is the ECB's current deposit rate).

But until the market takes out the significant 108.15 level I continue to view the current move as little more than a pre FOMC meeting squeeze driven by yields and positioning and believe there will be substantial resistance between 107.50 - 108 levels.

Compared to bonds, stocks have a higher current yield, and unlike bonds are likely to be worth more in a decade than they are today.

«We think the recently lowered dividend payout is sustainable, providing investors with an attractive 6 per cent fully franked yield at current prices... we view the risks facing Telstra as more than reflected in the current stock price, trading at 12 times forward earnings per share and 5.5 times earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation,» the analysts said.

The Panel acknowledges that «clinically based programs may cost more per candidate than current programs» but then simply asserts that they «will be more cost - effective by yielding educators who enter the field ready to teach.»

Either this discordant plan is a front for public school expansionism, bent on adding another grade or two to its current thirteen, and adding the staff (and dues - paying union members) that would accompany such growth, or it's a cynical calculation: only by appealing to the middle - class desire for taxpayers to underwrite the routine child - care needs of working parents will any movement occur on the pre-K front, and the heck with the truly disadvantaged youngsters who need more than that strategy will yield.

PG's current yield of more than 3 % after its recent dividend hike supports that conclusion.

The 1.3 % current yield might not be exceptionally high, but whatever the stock lacks in yield it more than compensates with dividend growth.

It bears repeating, that when it comes to investment safety, a long history of steady dividends is more important than a current high dividend yield.

Note, though, that when it comes to investment safety, a long history of steady dividends is more important than a current high dividend yield.

However, it's worth noting that current yields assume that bonds will be held to maturity; some market participants may believe they will be able to sell the bonds for more than they paid (i.e., yields will fall even more).

With a current dividend yield of 2.0 %, it doesn't pay significantly more than the S&P 500's 1.9 %.

- In fact, of all fixed income funds more than five years or older that have current yields of 6 % or more, nearly 3 out of 4 had a down - year of 20 % or more.

Here's the break - out, by fund inception date: Some observations: - Every fund listed (5 years or older) with current yields of 6 % or more, lost more than 20 % of its value in 2008, except three: PIMCO Income A PONAX, which lost only 6.0 %; TCW Total Return Bond I TGLMX, which lost only 6.2 % (in 1994); and First Eagle High Yield I FEHIX, which lost 15.8 %.

Yield more closely reflects current performance than total return.

To summarize then, when it comes to investment safety, a long history of steady dividends is more important than a current high dividend yield.

But note, though, that when it comes to investment safety, a long history of steady dividends is more important than a high current dividend yield.

Above all, note that when it comes to investment safety, a long history of steady dividends is more important than a current high dividend yield.

The seven - day yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

The current yield of 1.55 % might not be massive like AT&T's dividend (which is why we diversify, and it's why I'm listing 10 different stocks with different dynamics here), but Walt Disney more than makes up for that via strong dividend growth: the five - year dividend growth rate is 30.1 %, which is one of the higher rates you'll run across.

Keep in mind that this yield is also more than 150 basis points higher than its five - year average, which leads back to one of the points I made earlier about undervaluation and higher yield (which then results in more current income, more aggregate income, and potentially higher total return over the long run).

The yield presented in this table more closely reflects the current earnings of the Money Market Portfolio than the total return.

As a general rule, homes in less expensive neighborhoods offer the highest current yield potential, but generally come with more volatility, or risk, than more affluent neighborhoods.

That gives shares a current yield of 4.3 %, more than a 100 % premium to the S&P 500's 2.0 %.

That gives shares a current yield of 11.3 %, more than a 400 % premium to the S&P 500's average 2.0 % yield.

But note, though, that when it comes to investment safety, a long history of steady dividends is more important than a current high dividend yield.

For example, dividend consistency and growth are two things that are significantly more important for long - term investors than the stock's current yield.

If there is a material difference between the quoted total return and the quoted current yield, the yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the portfolio than the total return quotation.

It's also a small asset management company, it is a net - net with more cash and cash equivalents than it's market cap, it is profitable and paying a big dividend (current yield is 8.5 %).

Although it feels good to be closing in on a portfolio value of $ 150,000, I'd much prefer a natural correction in the stock market which would allow my current capital (which is more limited than usual) to go further by being able to purchase cheaper equities with higher yields.

At current levels of the market, the yield of these bonds more than compensates for the possibility of capital growth in equities (valuations are stretched)

Notice that the 5.9 % yield on cost is a full 48 % more than the portfolio's current yield of 4.0 %.

But the portfolio's yield on cost has now ballooned to a current run - rate of 5.9 %, or more than 2.8 times what it delivered in its first year of existence.

Consider, too, that the stock's current yield is more than 100 basis points higher than its five - year average of 1.8 %.

The major reason I wanted to buy UNS it very good 12 - 14 % dividend growth, If I'd buy it than, probably I would sell it too, because suddenly dividend growth went down to 2 %... another prove that current yield is more important that hoping of consistent higher dividend growth....

Current value (10/31/08): -2.4 % (equities yield 2.4 % more than bonds)

However, on a more normalized basis, Seahawk is likely to yield more than 65 % of its current market capitalization in cash flow and 50 % in FCF.

Take the JPMorgan Series Y preferred share, which yields 6.1 % as I write, more than triple the current payout on JPM's common stock!

For example, homes in less expensive neighborhoods typically offer the highest current yield potential, but generally come with more volatility, or risk, than more affluent neighborhoods.

More goes into it than looking at share price and the current dividend yield.

Besides, while bonds certainly seem risky in that at their current low yields they're especially vulnerable to rising rates, viewed from another angle they may be a lot more valuable than many investors realize.

But note that when it comes to investment safety, a long history of steady dividends is more important than a current high dividend yield.

Based on many studies covering a wide range of regions and crops, negative impacts of climate change on crop yields have been more common than positive impacts (high confidence)... Since AR4, several periods of rapid food and cereal price increases following climate extremes in key producing regions indicate a sensitivity of current markets to climate extremes among other factors (medium confidence).

The scientific process would seem to yield a much more reliable foundation on which to drive societal choices, rather than the current process of hobbling along with a failed energy market, the freedom to confuse people about science by knowingly lying about it in mass media, and unlimited, anonymous money in politics.