I personally hear the atheists I know complain
more than the religious people about others talking about their beliefs, could just be the people I know though.
But, yes, some pretty much are prostelyzing and defending their belief system (or their non-belief systems) as much and in some cases even
more than religious people do.
It is little wonder that atheists know
more than religious people.
Evidence points to theories and they're reputable and so I trust
those more than a religious person using the bible as the only source of proof for history, science, philosophy, ect...
Also, atheism does use faith, you have faith that there is no god (s), you can't prove your point
more than religious people can prove theirs, so there is no facts, no proof either way.
Atheists preach
more than religious people do here.
But, you're assuming that people who associate as spiritual, not religious act poorly or sin
more than religious people.
Not exact matches
In Turkey,
more than 32,000
people were put in jail and 100,000 have been dismissed from jobs in the security and civil services for their alleged links to a
religious network the government says staged the July 15 military coup.
As social scientist Arthur Brooks has documented,
religious people give far
more to all manner of do - gooding
than do secular
people.
That implies that
religious people are somehow
more caring or generous
than others.
A million times
more people have been kiIIed by
religious zealots in the name of their relgion
than an atheist in the name of atheism.
By the way
religious people are also happier, and
more generous
than the non-
religious.
In reality, the
religious person has far
more freedom of thought
than an athiest.
Just as ridiculous as being an extreme
religious person or being an atheist which both have
more in common with each other
than they let on.
I know
people who are not affiliated with any religion (agnostic, not atheist) that are far
more humane in action
than any number of «
religious»
people.
LinCA «That implies that
religious people are somehow
more caring or generous
than others.
So one group of radicals whom I doubt represent
more than 1 / 10th of 1 % of the world's
religious folks, and all
religious people are radical nuts.
They've got courage
more than other
religious people I know and apparently see on here.
Keeping in mind that believing a dead man came back to life and ascended bodily into heaven is no
more plausible
than anything Mormons believe, you have to wonder what Barnum would say about all
religious people.
Indeed, they do not, any
more than religious folks, experience emptiness, lack of purpose, lack of pleasure or such negativity generally stereotyped to religion - free
people.
Numerous studies have shown that
religious people donate
more time,
more money, and donate
more blood
than any other group of
people.
«
Religious people think Atheists are
people who have been subtly convinced by the devil to believe in themselves
more than believing in God...»
As it lifts, we're seeing that this country is
more religious than people think, and a million times
more than secularists would like.
Community of the kind Christ desires can only occur with another when He is shared as
more necessary
than breath amidst all
persons present, whether they be the
person «giving» or the one receiving — Christ must not be fore - fitted to some other monstrous conceit that is paraded as «communion» and «fellowship» — the common bane of our
religious activity.
I will not have the
religious right tell me Gay
people are an abomination no
more than I will have an Athiest tell me I am deluded or unintelligent.
«A study in the United States, published in the Social Forces journal and conducted by Sociology researcher Lisa A. Keister while she was at the Ohio State University, found that adherents of Judaism attained the most wealth, believers of Catholicism and mainline Protestants were in the middle, while conservative Protestants accu - mulated the least wealth, while in general
people who attend
religious services achieved
more wealth
than those who do not (taking into account variations of education and other factors).
Some
people are
more religious than others... and most hospitals ask if you want
religious services to stop by.
You sound like a wonderful
person (if you were
religious or not)... the professor you had obviously thought
more of himself
than he did of anyone else.
Science and the scientific method is universal and consistent all over the World whereas religion is regional and a
person's
religious conviction, no matter how deeply held, is clearly nothing
more than an accident of birth
He cared about
people more than His own reputation with the
religious establishment.
According to the work produced by David B. Barrett's
religious statistics organisation (FYI, the man was a Christian no less) atheists number
more than Jews, Sikh's, Shintos, Baha'is, Jains, combined, and if you want to consider all «non -
religious / secular / agnostic / atheist» together, since the whole «non-religion» movement is kinda riddled with
people who find conontations of words like «atheist» to be bad enough to not want to declare themselves atheist, you'll find the number of that non-
religious group also amounts
more than those religions plus buddhism, and taoism or even Confucianism.
Religious people are terrifying and usually
more than willing to inflict their way of belief on the rest of the
people.
I am for the elimination of hate, fear and control, religion is just the catalyst that
people use to hate, fear and control, getting rid of religion won't solve the problem, its like putting a band aid on a severe cut, its temporary, and it just hits the surface, instead we need to go deeper
than that to the root cause, I know lots of
religious people who don't hate, fear or control, there are also many beliefs such as paganism, Buddism, Taoism, which doesn't use hate fear, and self righteousness to condemn others, I think if maybe
more of the most major religions followed there teachings then we wouldn't have as much problems as we do.
Put some food in
people's stomach that act of charity is
more in line with a
religious act
than erecting that statue
And these
people have been taught for so long to take their
religious leaders at their word and that their religion means
more than anything that they don't care whether the
person is lying or not.
WE all know that ideas and truth mean
more to Atheists
than to
religious people (who are happy with fairytales).
Atheists simply have their natural instincts of empathy less - adjusted
than religious people and so, generally are
more moral.
Perhaps an indication that the
religious are far
more concerned with regulating
people's se - x lives
than in what
people actually believe?
@Maani: «it does not change the fact that
more people have died under atheist - led regimes
than under
religious - led ones.»
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false
religious doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments
people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as
more important
than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a
religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything
more, except put money when the basket is passed.
A very high percentage of
people here are
religious, but you can look at the demographics of a great many European countries and see that overall, Western Europe is far less
religious and
more Atheistic
than America.
Underscoring this point, they note that
religious switchers adhere even
more closely to the dominant moral ethos of their new groups
than do
people raised in those groups.
Reasoning with
people of faith is
more tricky
than the happiness one finds by abandoning their own faith in
religious delusion.
So... why are these
people not saying what really needs to be said... some of these Presidents were no
more than DEISTS and had no
religious affiliation...
While you may or may not be correct re the «reasoning» you cite, it does not change the fact that
more people have died under atheist - led regimes
than under
religious - led ones.
@Troy in Austin -
more people were killed in the 20th century by atheistically - driven ideology
than by all
religious - driven killings in all of history.
Reading the comments... couldn't help but notice the atheists getting even
more far out there
than the so called
religious persons ie:
It wasn't the summer that brought an end to my doubt, but it was the summer I encountered a different Jesus, a Jesus who requires
more from me
than intellectual assent and emotional allegiance; a Jesus who associated with sinners and infuriated the
religious; a Jesus who broke the rules and refused to cast the first stone; a Jesus who gravitated toward sick
people and crazy
people, homeless
people and hopeless
people; a Jesus who preferred story to exposition and metaphor to syllogism; a Jesus who answered questions with
more questions, and demands for proof with demands for faith... a Jesus who healed each
person differently and saved each
person differently; a Jesus who had no list of beliefs to check off, no doctrinal statements to sign, no surefire way to tell who was «in» and who was «out»; a Jesus who loved after being betrayed, healed after being hurt, and forgave while being nailed to a tree; a Jesus who asked his disciples to do the same...
To paraphrase Jesus» comment,
people who are concerned only with the affairs of this world often show
more ingenuity in seeking their ends
than religious people do in trying to accomplish God's will.
Can you back up your implication that atheists are
more attached to money
than religious people with any kind of facts?