Sentences with phrase «more time freedom»

Laura's guidance, perspective, and ability to see things from a strategic and pragmatic place helped me make decisions that paid off big - time with consistently higher profit coupled with more time freedom.
I decided that I wanted to transition to swing trading for more time freedom.
I only mention it as an option to trade this system with a restrictive schedule or to simply provide more time freedom.

Not exact matches

My results, especially in discipline, freedom of expression, and clarity of ideas, are more valuable than almost anything else I can imagine otherwise doing in that time, certainly watching TV.
Signed in December 2016 and ratified in November, the EU said at the time that it hoped to position its companies for Cuba's transition to a more open economy and allow the EU to press for political freedoms on the island.
make this uprising more focused on economic grievances than issues like freedom of speech and women's» rights, which dominated the demands of protesters in the past, according to the New York Times.
However, as I've experienced myself, if you have the right temperament and you don't mind a little instability at times, you may make even more money and enjoy a greater sense of freedom and control over how much time you devote to work.
My book, Virtual Freedom: How to Work with Virtual Staff to Buy More Time, Become More Productive and Build Your Dream Business is the culmination of over a decade in the outsourcing industry and the result of working with thousands of entrepreneurs on their virtual team building strategies.
it allows me to work from anywhere and have more freedom with work hours and taking time off.
«No more anxiety about costs... The freedom to choose when it's time for mom or dad to go back to work.
Virtual Freedom: How to Work with Virtual Staff to Buy More Time, Become More Productive, and Build Your Dream Business
Perhaps you yearn for financial freedom, getting back to basics, or having more unstructured time to create, recharge your batteries, and relax.
More than 100 years ago, Dostoyevsky wrote: «Money is coined liberty, and so it is ten times dearer to the man who is deprived of freedom.
One word at a time, Sarah liberates us from the agony of bearing our stories alone, so we can follow Jesus (my favorite feminist) with more freedom and joy.
At the same time, as John Paul II wrote in Centesimus Annus, human freedom is more than simply economic freedom.
Now more than ever there is a need for a time of peace and intellectual freedom in which devout thinkers can interpret the Qur» an in the light of the progress of human knowledge.
This has nothing to do with any freedoms... I shouldn't be allowed to waste time with a handball game any more than you should waste time with a prayer.
Existentialist philosophy may push the revolution to its limit as in Sartre's doctrine that man creates himself out of nothing, and this «nothing» is at the heart of man's freedom.36 There are more balanced views, but we can not escape the fact that our sense of time and becoming has created a new understanding of what it means to be.
To the extent that the man - made setting of man's life and the setting which was naturally antecedent to human freedom are specifically different, the latter being characteristic of earlier times and the former of the present, we are now living in a setting which almost in its very essence is more complicated and intractable and inaccessible to the understanding of the individual than was ever the case before.
It is really bizarre that the GOP bellows about wanting «small» government and more «freedom» while at the same time working to destroy human rights and true ability to choose for oneself.
As soon as the 2nd amendment starts becoming modified to fit the times we live in, that will be the moment our freedoms start to become watered - down, and consequently, after more and more efforts are made to further limit the meaning of the 2nd amendment, we will find ourselves with such a weak interpretation or effictive realization of the 2nd amendment that it will be too late, and we might as well arm ourselves with BB guns.
This does not mean that there is a point at which accommodation and neutrality converge (although there may be); it means only that as time and cases go by, the state - centeredness of what we are bold to call religious freedom is more and more apparent, and the pressure on religionists to conform to the expectations of others grows and grows, with the inevitable complicity of the judges who supposedly protect religion's «right» to be free.
one day at a time with the fresh Grace and mercy that is poured out on and in your heart to take and share with someone you might have hurt that is very dear to you, that is empowerment that is forgiveness that brings peace beyond all understanding KNOWING that there is NO ONE that Has control of your life any more, that is the freedom that not only did this UNITED STATES not fully recieve but is being stolen from them one citizen at a time, do they care ah let me see?
Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.
He did not rouse people to anger but worked steadily towards the goal, achieving a measure of freedom that at one times seemed impossible... and then, under God's providence, achieving a great deal more.
But it is past time to ask ourselves whether, challenged by Islam and the Jihadists who would define Islam, our monothematic language about «freedom» and «democracy» when describing America's role in the world is not inadvertently contributing to the defeat of the more decent and peaceful world for which we hope.
In the course of time, matter becomes more and more reflective of human freedom.
It can be expressed in two categories, on which I have reflected and worked several times, which explicitly tie freedom to hope: the category of «in spite of» and that of «how much more
In dialogue with physicists such as David Bohm and Ilya Prigogine, process thought maintains that its view of time is more adequate, does not violate the fundamental tenets of physics, and upholds the concept and experience of freedom.
I have felt the freedom now for so long a time that I am sure of my relation toward it; and I could no more harbor any of the thieving and depressing influences that once I nursed as a heritage of humanity than a fop would voluntarily wallow in a filthy gutter.
tradition hard to break.the tradition of marriage is older and more meaningful than any other we know it crosses all religions and non religions, and races and cultures.it won't change easy.calling it something else for some people may make it easier to change.but what about those people who want that time tested tradition for themselves for their own self worth.it is a civil right give it to them today.this issues has divided my community as much as any other, but as we have fought to gain right after right, we have lost sight that all deserve the right of freedom of happiness.No gayness here, just can't fight the battle to keep someone down after being held down
Like many social conservatives, especially Christian ones, I spend a lot of my time reading and writing about religious freedom, especially how it might be affected by the legalization of same - sex marriage and the campaign for «gay rights» more generally.Yet at the same time, I harbor doubts about the position we are staking out.You see, I sometimes think that Justice Scalia's majority opinion in Employment Division v. Smith may have been correct.
At a time when delegates from all over the world are coming together in a variety of bodies for the purpose of attempting to sketch a first outline of future society, it seems to me essential to set forth the main constructive axes without which it is mere self - delusion to suppose that we can conceive or undertake any re-ordering or development of the Earth: general tendencies of advance and growth, that is to say, which in certain conditions — despite our freedom of choice, or better still, because of it — Mankind can not in any circumstances ignore, and must heed more and more as time goes on.
The campus offered the freedom to do that which was impossible in the parish, and more than one of us has maintained the title «campus minister» while inching ever closer to full - time teaching.
Though deeply entrenched, well - financed, and of course enormously powerful, these blackguards are nevertheless routed by a small but dedicated band of courageous, freedom - loving women and their equally virtuous allies, who appear to spend most of their time selflessly pursuing noble causes and making life more beautiful and meaningful for all Americans, especially the downtrodden.
Divine immanence is thus more strongly emphasized than transcendence, yet God's freedom and relative independence are defended, along with his priority in status (though not priority in time).
I have noticed something: when others see you living liberated, talking liberated, it will either drive them deeper into their self - imposed bondage where it is more secure and comfortable for them, or it will beckon them out of their bonds to enjoy their own freedom which is frightening at first but exhilarating in time.
im tired too of going to church, i am 17 years old and live with my parents that are of this christianity at 18 i can leave house yeaaaaaaaa not having to go ever again to church, that means No more legalism, No more judging No more having to go to sunndays in crazy rainy days and burning hot days, No more having to be presioned by the church doctrine i can be able to get a girlfriend and have relations and happly get on with my life actually in my family all my cousins left church because they werent able to handle all of the church commands and so do i, we are no longer living in the monarchy kingdom times we are in the 21century and have the right to have freedom.
How much more, then, does true love want to outlast time and, for this purpose, to rid itself of its most dangerous enemy, its own freedom of choice.
Such rigid faith and uncompromising attitude apart, it is clear to more and more Christians and theologians both in the East and in the West that Buddhists, Taoists, or Muslims are here to stay for a long time, to practice their faiths not only in the lands of their birth but also in the Western society in which they have come to live in pursuit of political freedom and personal fortune.
All he needs is more playing timefreedom 2play in his prefered position.
Bottom line, if he is angered bench the players who were not good enough and play those who deserve some game time based on the Southampton game or on games where they had a positive impact: - Take Özil out and play Ox in the hole (he has to understand your the highest paid player of the club, your given freedom like nobody else and your even seeking even more money with a new contract you can't play like that ever and go AWOL)- Put Sanchez on the wing or up top but put Welbeck in (Walcott didn't track back near enough for the Alsonso goal)- Iwobi has been bright from the wing let him play there - Xhaka has to go back in the holding midfield role and I would take out Coquelin because he could've taken a foul on the hazard's goal.
Although Flamini is not the greatest player on the ball, his presence in the midfield allows the other midfielders more freedom to commit to the attacks while at the same time not exposing us on the counter.
Until we find the complete midfielder like matic who can initiate attacks and defend at the same time, or a quicker ball playing cb instead of per, we need two midfielders shielding the back four which gives our fb's more freedom to operate further down the pitch
With all of the activities at the three day event that is being planned, students and coaches understand that participating in The Honor Bowl is more than a win or a loss; it is a time to reflect on what our military has done and continues to do for the freedom America's Armed Forces provide us.
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
What's more important, the genes of an All - Star or having a parent with the time and freedom to coach you through your formative years?
Of course, but remember that a lot of these teams have been around 6 - 7 times longer than MLS and they have a lot more freedom to spend money.
That tandem isn't good enough to get 4th place let alone win the EPL... the fact remains that when they play together Ramsey spends far more time inside the opposing teams's final 3rd which means that Xhaka has to drop even deeper to compensate for the freedom Wenger gives to his beloved Welshman... the obvious problem with that is it exposes the weakness of both players
He has much more freedom to move and at the same time he has now the bravery and the personality to dribble at rivals without fear.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z