Laura's guidance, perspective, and ability to see things from a strategic and pragmatic place helped me make decisions that paid off big - time with consistently higher profit coupled with
more time freedom.
I decided that I wanted to transition to swing trading for
more time freedom.
I only mention it as an option to trade this system with a restrictive schedule or to simply provide
more time freedom.
Not exact matches
My results, especially in discipline,
freedom of expression, and clarity of ideas, are
more valuable than almost anything else I can imagine otherwise doing in that
time, certainly watching TV.
Signed in December 2016 and ratified in November, the EU said at the
time that it hoped to position its companies for Cuba's transition to a
more open economy and allow the EU to press for political
freedoms on the island.
make this uprising
more focused on economic grievances than issues like
freedom of speech and women's» rights, which dominated the demands of protesters in the past, according to the New York
Times.
However, as I've experienced myself, if you have the right temperament and you don't mind a little instability at
times, you may make even
more money and enjoy a greater sense of
freedom and control over how much
time you devote to work.
My book, Virtual
Freedom: How to Work with Virtual Staff to Buy
More Time, Become
More Productive and Build Your Dream Business is the culmination of over a decade in the outsourcing industry and the result of working with thousands of entrepreneurs on their virtual team building strategies.
it allows me to work from anywhere and have
more freedom with work hours and taking
time off.
«No
more anxiety about costs... The
freedom to choose when it's
time for mom or dad to go back to work.
Virtual
Freedom: How to Work with Virtual Staff to Buy
More Time, Become
More Productive, and Build Your Dream Business
Perhaps you yearn for financial
freedom, getting back to basics, or having
more unstructured
time to create, recharge your batteries, and relax.
More than 100 years ago, Dostoyevsky wrote: «Money is coined liberty, and so it is ten
times dearer to the man who is deprived of
freedom.
One word at a
time, Sarah liberates us from the agony of bearing our stories alone, so we can follow Jesus (my favorite feminist) with
more freedom and joy.
At the same
time, as John Paul II wrote in Centesimus Annus, human
freedom is
more than simply economic
freedom.
Now
more than ever there is a need for a
time of peace and intellectual
freedom in which devout thinkers can interpret the Qur» an in the light of the progress of human knowledge.
This has nothing to do with any
freedoms... I shouldn't be allowed to waste
time with a handball game any
more than you should waste
time with a prayer.
Existentialist philosophy may push the revolution to its limit as in Sartre's doctrine that man creates himself out of nothing, and this «nothing» is at the heart of man's
freedom.36 There are
more balanced views, but we can not escape the fact that our sense of
time and becoming has created a new understanding of what it means to be.
To the extent that the man - made setting of man's life and the setting which was naturally antecedent to human
freedom are specifically different, the latter being characteristic of earlier
times and the former of the present, we are now living in a setting which almost in its very essence is
more complicated and intractable and inaccessible to the understanding of the individual than was ever the case before.
It is really bizarre that the GOP bellows about wanting «small» government and
more «
freedom» while at the same
time working to destroy human rights and true ability to choose for oneself.
As soon as the 2nd amendment starts becoming modified to fit the
times we live in, that will be the moment our
freedoms start to become watered - down, and consequently, after
more and
more efforts are made to further limit the meaning of the 2nd amendment, we will find ourselves with such a weak interpretation or effictive realization of the 2nd amendment that it will be too late, and we might as well arm ourselves with BB guns.
This does not mean that there is a point at which accommodation and neutrality converge (although there may be); it means only that as
time and cases go by, the state - centeredness of what we are bold to call religious
freedom is
more and
more apparent, and the pressure on religionists to conform to the expectations of others grows and grows, with the inevitable complicity of the judges who supposedly protect religion's «right» to be free.
one day at a
time with the fresh Grace and mercy that is poured out on and in your heart to take and share with someone you might have hurt that is very dear to you, that is empowerment that is forgiveness that brings peace beyond all understanding KNOWING that there is NO ONE that Has control of your life any
more, that is the
freedom that not only did this UNITED STATES not fully recieve but is being stolen from them one citizen at a
time, do they care ah let me see?
Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «
freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the
time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a
more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.
He did not rouse people to anger but worked steadily towards the goal, achieving a measure of
freedom that at one
times seemed impossible... and then, under God's providence, achieving a great deal
more.
But it is past
time to ask ourselves whether, challenged by Islam and the Jihadists who would define Islam, our monothematic language about «
freedom» and «democracy» when describing America's role in the world is not inadvertently contributing to the defeat of the
more decent and peaceful world for which we hope.
In the course of
time, matter becomes
more and
more reflective of human
freedom.
It can be expressed in two categories, on which I have reflected and worked several
times, which explicitly tie
freedom to hope: the category of «in spite of» and that of «how much
more.»
In dialogue with physicists such as David Bohm and Ilya Prigogine, process thought maintains that its view of
time is
more adequate, does not violate the fundamental tenets of physics, and upholds the concept and experience of
freedom.
I have felt the
freedom now for so long a
time that I am sure of my relation toward it; and I could no
more harbor any of the thieving and depressing influences that once I nursed as a heritage of humanity than a fop would voluntarily wallow in a filthy gutter.
tradition hard to break.the tradition of marriage is older and
more meaningful than any other we know it crosses all religions and non religions, and races and cultures.it won't change easy.calling it something else for some people may make it easier to change.but what about those people who want that
time tested tradition for themselves for their own self worth.it is a civil right give it to them today.this issues has divided my community as much as any other, but as we have fought to gain right after right, we have lost sight that all deserve the right of
freedom of happiness.No gayness here, just can't fight the battle to keep someone down after being held down
Like many social conservatives, especially Christian ones, I spend a lot of my
time reading and writing about religious
freedom, especially how it might be affected by the legalization of same - sex marriage and the campaign for «gay rights»
more generally.Yet at the same
time, I harbor doubts about the position we are staking out.You see, I sometimes think that Justice Scalia's majority opinion in Employment Division v. Smith may have been correct.
At a
time when delegates from all over the world are coming together in a variety of bodies for the purpose of attempting to sketch a first outline of future society, it seems to me essential to set forth the main constructive axes without which it is mere self - delusion to suppose that we can conceive or undertake any re-ordering or development of the Earth: general tendencies of advance and growth, that is to say, which in certain conditions — despite our
freedom of choice, or better still, because of it — Mankind can not in any circumstances ignore, and must heed
more and
more as
time goes on.
The campus offered the
freedom to do that which was impossible in the parish, and
more than one of us has maintained the title «campus minister» while inching ever closer to full -
time teaching.
Though deeply entrenched, well - financed, and of course enormously powerful, these blackguards are nevertheless routed by a small but dedicated band of courageous,
freedom - loving women and their equally virtuous allies, who appear to spend most of their
time selflessly pursuing noble causes and making life
more beautiful and meaningful for all Americans, especially the downtrodden.
Divine immanence is thus
more strongly emphasized than transcendence, yet God's
freedom and relative independence are defended, along with his priority in status (though not priority in
time).
I have noticed something: when others see you living liberated, talking liberated, it will either drive them deeper into their self - imposed bondage where it is
more secure and comfortable for them, or it will beckon them out of their bonds to enjoy their own
freedom which is frightening at first but exhilarating in
time.
im tired too of going to church, i am 17 years old and live with my parents that are of this christianity at 18 i can leave house yeaaaaaaaa not having to go ever again to church, that means No
more legalism, No
more judging No
more having to go to sunndays in crazy rainy days and burning hot days, No
more having to be presioned by the church doctrine i can be able to get a girlfriend and have relations and happly get on with my life actually in my family all my cousins left church because they werent able to handle all of the church commands and so do i, we are no longer living in the monarchy kingdom
times we are in the 21century and have the right to have
freedom.
How much
more, then, does true love want to outlast
time and, for this purpose, to rid itself of its most dangerous enemy, its own
freedom of choice.
Such rigid faith and uncompromising attitude apart, it is clear to
more and
more Christians and theologians both in the East and in the West that Buddhists, Taoists, or Muslims are here to stay for a long
time, to practice their faiths not only in the lands of their birth but also in the Western society in which they have come to live in pursuit of political
freedom and personal fortune.
All he needs is
more playing
time n»
freedom 2play in his prefered position.
Bottom line, if he is angered bench the players who were not good enough and play those who deserve some game
time based on the Southampton game or on games where they had a positive impact: - Take Özil out and play Ox in the hole (he has to understand your the highest paid player of the club, your given
freedom like nobody else and your even seeking even
more money with a new contract you can't play like that ever and go AWOL)- Put Sanchez on the wing or up top but put Welbeck in (Walcott didn't track back near enough for the Alsonso goal)- Iwobi has been bright from the wing let him play there - Xhaka has to go back in the holding midfield role and I would take out Coquelin because he could've taken a foul on the hazard's goal.
Although Flamini is not the greatest player on the ball, his presence in the midfield allows the other midfielders
more freedom to commit to the attacks while at the same
time not exposing us on the counter.
Until we find the complete midfielder like matic who can initiate attacks and defend at the same
time, or a quicker ball playing cb instead of per, we need two midfielders shielding the back four which gives our fb's
more freedom to operate further down the pitch
With all of the activities at the three day event that is being planned, students and coaches understand that participating in The Honor Bowl is
more than a win or a loss; it is a
time to reflect on what our military has done and continues to do for the
freedom America's Armed Forces provide us.
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when
times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared
more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and
more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his
time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
What's
more important, the genes of an All - Star or having a parent with the
time and
freedom to coach you through your formative years?
Of course, but remember that a lot of these teams have been around 6 - 7
times longer than MLS and they have a lot
more freedom to spend money.
That tandem isn't good enough to get 4th place let alone win the EPL... the fact remains that when they play together Ramsey spends far
more time inside the opposing teams's final 3rd which means that Xhaka has to drop even deeper to compensate for the
freedom Wenger gives to his beloved Welshman... the obvious problem with that is it exposes the weakness of both players
He has much
more freedom to move and at the same
time he has now the bravery and the personality to dribble at rivals without fear.»