The DTSA will almost certainly lead to
more trade secrets litigation.
Not exact matches
Perkins Coie's IP practice includes
more than 250 lawyers focused on IP
litigation, post-grant proceedings, patent and trademark prosecution, strategic portfolio counseling, technology licensing, copyrights, and
trade secret and unfair competition counseling.
Mr. Howland was formerly a partner in the intellectual property practice at Jones Day, where he spent
more than 15 years representing clients in patent and
trade secret litigation in federal courts around the country and before the International Trade Commission on matters involving: ◾ Semiconductor manufacturing ◾ Analog and digital circuits ◾ Microprocessor, memory, and network architectures ◾ Wireless communications ◾ Software ◾ Payment systems, encryption, and network sec
trade secret litigation in federal courts around the country and before the International
Trade Commission on matters involving: ◾ Semiconductor manufacturing ◾ Analog and digital circuits ◾ Microprocessor, memory, and network architectures ◾ Wireless communications ◾ Software ◾ Payment systems, encryption, and network sec
Trade Commission on matters involving: ◾ Semiconductor manufacturing ◾ Analog and digital circuits ◾ Microprocessor, memory, and network architectures ◾ Wireless communications ◾ Software ◾ Payment systems, encryption, and network security
Of these redacted documents, Lee found 194 documents with «failed redactions,» mainly from commerical
litigation in which the parties attempted to redact text concerning
trade secrets, medical information, addresses, dates of birth, witness names, jurors, and
more.
Lewry has
more than 30 years of intellectual property (IP)
litigation experience, focusing on a variety of IP matters including patents, trademarks, copyrights and
trade secrets.
Lewis has spent
more than 20 years handling high - stakes, commercial
litigation in a broad range of practice areas, including antitrust, patent and trademark infringement, and
trade secret disputes.
The commercial
litigation data includes the nature of the resolution, any compensatory or punitive damages, and the legal finding — contract breach, rescission, unjust enrichment,
trade secret misappropriation, and many
more.
Some of our notable entertainment and media attorneys are: John Quinn, General Counsel of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, who has also represented entertainment and media clients in a number of high profile cases; Kathleen Sullivan, the former Dean of Stanford Law School, First Amendment scholar, and nationally renowned appellate advocate, who heads the firm's appellate practice group; Bob Raskopf, an expert in the sports, entertainment and media bars in New York, who is perhaps best known for his work on behalf of professional sports leagues and teams, newspapers and publishers; Claude Stern, who has represented a broad array of leading software developers, videogame manufacturers, online publishers and other media clients in all forms of intellectual property
litigation, including copyright, patent,
trade secret, trademark, and licensing disputes; Bruce Van Dalsem, who has tried and resolved disputes for studios, producers and performing artists in the film, television, music and finance businesses, securing a top five verdict in California based on the misappropriation of a film library; Gary Gans, an expert litigator in motion picture financing, production and distribution disputes, as well as copyright and idea theft cases, who has been named in 2012 by The Hollywood Reporter as one of America's «Top Entertainment Attorneys;» Jeff McFarland, who has litigated entertainment related cases for
more than 20 years, including cases involving motion picture and television series profits, video game licenses, idea theft and the «seven year rule;» and Michael Williams, who represents a satellite exhibitor and other media clients in trademark, copyright, patent, antitrust and other commercial
litigation.
She has
more than a dozen years of experience representing leading technology and life sciences companies in high stakes patent infringement,
trade secret, and breach of contract
litigation in federal courts across the country.
While it's still early to interpret how it will affect
trade secret litigation, some things are clear, especially that federal court dockets will see an increase in
more private
trade secrets cases.