A more valid criticism is that I'm actually taking out too much data, as the eruptions are only partially responsible for cooling in that period — for instance there was a La Niña episode in 1984
Even the removal of a bust slider for female characters isn't worth getting mad about, although it certainly is a much
more valid criticism, as it does restrict basic character creation.
Not exact matches
McMahon does make a
valid point, and he added another important argument that Mourinho will only risk
more criticism if he plays negatively and City still win.
your
criticism would be a lot
more valid if you cared to back it up with... maybe anything at all??
Henchoz»
criticisms are basically the ones thrown at Rafa by legions of armchair fans in concert with the gutter press — are they all the
more valid now that an ex-Liverpool player is chiming in with his tuppence worth?
For example, I think Stuart's
criticism is a
more valid one of a system where the party has to hold a primary ballot, and where anybody at all can put in as a candidate, and anybody can choose to vote in it.
The
criticism that raising the tax threshold gives money to people who do not really need it becomes even
more valid without
more extensive redistribution, especially with VAT being increased.
There's plenty of
valid negative
criticism about THE COUNSELOR that doesn't boil down to wanting something
more cheerful.
And whatever PR folderol you've read about The Princess and the Frog representing the company's «first black princess,» be aware that Bold Leaps Forward are hardly the priority here, the common but wholly -
valid criticism being that the characters spend
more screentime as frogs than as people.
To be sure, Brimelow makes some
valid criticisms of unions - the bargaining of sometimes too - rigid employment contracts; some unions» «just say - no»» attitude toward reform; proposals for
more authority without accompanying responsibility for results.
The
criticism is a
valid one because, as you can see from the chart below, resource companies make up
more than half the index and financials make up another one - third of the index.
I'd much rather, when all was said and done, be remembered as one of the ones with the
valid criticisms, but to err is human, and to find a response that leads to a temporary cessation of stupidity is as good for the very bright as for the very dim, if it has a
more general application.
Some of their
criticisms were
valid, like questioning the
more extreme predictions for ocean - level rise or the dubious link to hurricanes, and they were certainly right to bring up the cost - benefit analysis of cap - and - trade.
Given the reluctance of the IPCC to engage with the
valid criticisms it's critics have, you have to expect the clamour for answers to get louder,
more strident, and
more insistent.
In fact, in a very contrite reply to a comment on their paper, they not only agreed with the commenter that his
criticism was potentially
valid but they pointed out that there were other even
more important deficiencies in their model.
This,
more than anything Steve or RomanM have published to date, is probably the most
valid criticism of the Yamal dataset.
Had my discussion focused on the
more than 20 million people displaced by this flood, your
criticism would have been
valid.
I think the core of your argument as I see it (the need for scientists to be less defensive, less circling of the wagons,
more introspection,
more communication and collaboration with «outsiders», taking
criticism seriously, etc) is important and
valid.