Sentences with phrase «more value for your money because»

A Certified Hertz car offers more value for your money because it comes standard with a 12 - MONTH / 12, 000 * MILES Powertrain Coverage warranty.

Not exact matches

«These are all things that people have bought in the past, and driven to completely irrational prices, not because they did anything useful or produced any money and value to society, but solely because they thought they would be able to sell them to someone else for more in the future,» he writes.

In other words, preserving the value of money and that's very important, because a stable money is really a foundation for economic prosperity more generally.

This idea revolutionized the world because it was fresh and very smart, if you own a stock below its intrinsic value and the company goes bankrupt, then you will get in return more than what you paid for, so, if the company goes bankrupt, you make money and if the company does well, then you keep making money.

Obviously, we know our readers are smart and will only buy items that make sense for them, but we do include product links when appropriate (products we use or like) because any small amount of money earned through affiliate links help make it possible for us to continue to build new content on this blog and offer more value to our readers.

Because it operates in the hard - hit auto industry area, Redmer explains that it's even more important that their customers receive a good value for their money.

The amount of money you would have to pay them, if you pay them a certain amount they would have to get that much money and even more because of taxable benefit issues just to pay for the value of their scholarship.

Correction The initial fee paid for Di Maria was 25 million Euros, Which at that time when the value of the Euro was half of the pound (I know this because i was in Portugal, when this news broke) equates to around 12.5 Million, Plus a further 11 Million Euros # 6.5 Million If he won a title in his first season which they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clause.

Likewise, one reason L.A. can pay that much money is because they've spent the past 30 years paying for success and taking risks and refusing to rebuild, which in turn made them the most valuable and visible team in the NBA, with massive revenue streams that allow them to overpay for future success, guaranteeing more value.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The first one you should consider other than value for money is the dependability to bring it under all circumstances, one that could easily be fit inside of a car and equally comfortable to lug around since its made of lightweight materials and one that could also make your baby appear more loveable because of its stylish design.

This is not negligible because it is better to have the value for your money last because you want to spend more money on other things your baby needs.

My council has spent more, in total, on grants to voluntary groups, while cutting spending elsewhere, because we believe the voluntary sector offers value for money.

I did my best to include all the value for money choices because after all, who says that you can't have more than one?

Because of tax and debt limits, educational districts could not raise tax rates or borrow more money using traditional Current Interest Bonds to compensate for the loss in revenue resulting from the decline in property values.

These cars save you money because you don't pay for the initial depreciation, which can knock 25 percent or more off the car's value.

When the Kia name first appeared in the UK, it was on the nose of a budget supermini that appealed to buyers because it represented value for money more than anything else.

I pass over all the.99 cent books on KU, and add the books valued at $ 3.99 and up, because I am less likely to pay more money on a flier for fiction.

Not only that, but audiobooks sell for much more money because they have more value.

The only problem with the above methodology is that it doesn't account for the time value of money - that is, the money you save on closing costs is more valuable than interest saved in future years because you can put it to work right away.

Many quite valuable businesses don't pay dividends at all because they believe they can create more value for the shareholders by reinvesting the money instead of distributing it now.

You could also cash out the cash value and invest it in something more aggressive; whole life insurance is an inherently conservative play, and because you have a long period of time before you need money for retirement, it may make more sense to take the income tax hit now and better utilize that money in a more aggressive investment portfolio.

Because these assets are more unlikely to lose value, they typically don't make much money for you.

But if you have other reliable income sources from outside your investments — Social Security and pension and so forth — then your lifestyle is not as exposed to if your portfolio declines in value, you could potentially spend at a higher rate, and enjoy that money, it's more discretionary in nature for you, because you do have your lifestyle protected in other ways.

But because of the limits features like participation rates and caps place on returns, the value of your annuity may grow much more slowly over the long run than had you simply put some of your money in cash and / or short - term bond funds for security and the rest in low - cost stock index funds.

Over the longest term, your results will be superior either because the market eventually returns the price to its fair value, or because for as long as its under its fair value, your reinvested dividends or the company's share repurchases will be able to buy more shares for the same amount of money.

Carrington Budget Apartments offers self - contained, one bedroom apartments which sleeps up to four people and the two bedroom apartments which sleeps up to 6 people and offers value for money because it would be hard to find a more centrally located self - contained budget apartment hotel than the Carrington Budget Apartments

Doesn't cost Sony anything, actually makes people not cancel their subscription because they will feel that they are getting value for money, and make Sony more money.

You my friend... would be so wrong lol as much as I believe certain things shouldn't cost to get in game such as season passes for Naruto I will shut my mouth and throw my money at them because to me it is worth it as I find $ 30 to be a good value for what I will get out of this game such as I do in Fallout 4 because I believe what I am getting out of the experience is much more than going out to eat or the like but thats just me

Maybe Kangaroo court is its more appropriate name, because it is clear to even me that the whole process is just being casually strung along so that those being paid to harass and frustrate my situation give good value for money.

Improving operational efficiency is the key, because when waste is eliminated, more time can be spent creating value for clients and earning money for it.

The main purpose of the legal reserve is to provide lifetime protection, but because more money is collected in premiums in the early years of a policy than is needed to cover the mortality charge, level - premium policies develop a cash value, which the policyholder can borrow against, or can surrender the policy for its cash value if the policyholder no longer wishes to continue the life insurance policy.

The value of robo - advisors is they open up investment management to more investors because they're «best for novice investors who want a simplified, automated, affordable way to grow their money.»

Investors buy groups of life insurance policies for more than their current cash value because with a large enough group of policies, they will make money from the death benefit payouts.

I forgave the original OnePlus One's polycarbonate looks because the phone offered such fantastic value for money, but when the OnePlus 2 came round many people, myself included, wanted more than what was on offer.

Because a whale might have unfathomable amounts of money and the belief that their contract will expire at a value less than the price they purchased the contract for, it would not be surprising if the whales pumped up Bitcoin price in the days leading up to the contract expiration date by buying more Bitcoin, and then sell off a large chunk of it on an exchange at the inflated price — hours before their contract expires.

With this information about your candidate's goals and values you are more likely to make a successful offer because money usually isn't the only motivator for leaving an employer.

As a matter of fact, you will get more value for your money from us compared to others because you will be paired with a writer who is familiar with your field of study so that it will be easier for you to communicate your needs.

In New Jersey, division of property (called «equitable distribution») as a matter of law can not be affected by fault of a spouse, that is, a judge can not award you more or less property or money for the value of property because you perceive your spouse as the cause of the breakup.

I question whether you will make more money by charging for laundry, because it reduces the rent value of the unit.

Hard Money loans are ideal for novice home flippers because they care more about the property and its potential value than about the borrower's experience or financial qualifications.

But real estate shares have been hit harder because of investor concern that interest rates, once they increase, will be a drag on property values and make it more expensive for REITs to raise money.

Plenty of money but apparently see no need to take care of the property, and to add insult to injury the property next door is even worse and between the two of them, huge negative value for others on the street possibly, yet the owner wanted 55k more than other sale comps that showed beautifully, and has a «friend» of the family who has promised to list it and sell it at the owner's suggested price, apparently; just wanted to pick my brain because he acknowledges my expertise.

Market value appreciation: The fair market value of your home may rise because similar houses in your area are now selling for more money.