You wouldn't claim people get
more votes under other forms of runoff voting (two round system or exhaustive ballot for example).
Not exact matches
In 2012, the first election
under those new maps, Republicans won a 33 - seat majority in the U.S. House even though Democratic candidates across the country received 1.4 million
more votes than their Republican opponents.
Following completion of this offering, the Principal Stockholders will control
more than 50 % of the combined
voting power of our common stock, so
under current listing standards, we would qualify as a «controlled company» and accordingly, will be exempt from requirements to have a majority of independent directors, a fully independent nominating and corporate governance committee and a fully independent compensation committee.
Although the Conservatives later replaced the Canadian Building Incentive Program with a similar program, the new one is
more limited in scope with a smaller budget — typical of the cuts Harper made to many climate related initiatives that had been proposed and
voted through in Parliament
under the previous Liberal government.
OTTAWA — Nine million
votes were wasted in the 2015 election
under Canada's winner - take - all electoral system — that's
more than the populations of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and the Atlantic provinces combined, according to a new electoral reform primer outlining why the principle of proportionality must underpin the government's promise to bring in
voting reform by the next federal election.
Under the 2017 Plan, a change in control is defined to include (1) the acquisition by any person or company of
more than 50 % of the combined
voting power of our then outstanding stock, (2) a merger, consolidation, or similar transaction in which our stockholders immediately before the transaction do not own, directly or indirectly,
more than 50 % of the combined
voting power of the surviving entity (or the parent of the surviving entity), (3) a sale, lease, exclusive license, or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets other than to an entity
more than 50 % of the combined
voting power of which is owned by our stockholders, and (4) an unapproved change in the majority of the board of directors.
Under these rules, a company of which
more than 50 % of the
voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is a «controlled company» and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements of the, including (1) the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (2) the requirement that we have a nominating and corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee's purpose and responsibilities and (3) the requirement that we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee's purpose and responsibilities.
and cocacola bitcoins can be split also in
more fine tuned cocacola privately controled bitcoins... can be an cocacola loyality tickets bitcoins with a diferent rule set of acces to generators, number of total coins, rules to get for free this bitcoins, and exchange value that of IPO
vote pover cocacola bitcoins or general cocacola bitcoins that can be used to buy a cocacola bottle... all can be exchanged
under privately owned corporate cocacola exchange market with various exchaning values
And you may
vote a certain way or not but that doesn't matter, you've got 27,000 employees and I think the fact is that you're operating
under a Federal Trade Commission consent decree from 2011, that's a real thing and it goes for twenty years so when someone said «do we need
more regulations, do we need
more legislation?»
The day that Islam advocates all freedom for all women I will have no problem with
more Mosques, in the meantime, because this belief / Creed / Religion as it is now (and has been over thousands of years
under the world's noses) women are still not allowed to
vote, women are not doctors, they do not study to become lawyers, owners of companies, presidents of countries.
They both belive when they die they well have, meet there 7 wives in heven u think that's not a cult?if america
votes in a CULT member to run our country the gates of hell well open and we better be ready america.so america there is 2 of them I for one am not well to go back 150 yrs.6 on one off mentality.I grew up around those people and they r sick like the musliums they wear grab also but they hide there's
under there clothes.what
more r they hiding plenty.ask them how many times they r babtized not in there they take someone elses name everytime they get diped that is why there cult is so big ask one and they well lie or come up with even a bigger lie.they need to be fully investagated ppl.don't let the deep pockets and smile fool u.
Some other news about young people: 57 percent said that the primary reason they helped others was that it «makes them feel good personally»; 19 percent would not fight for their country
under any circumstances, 24 percent were uncertain and 60 percent would not be willing to volunteer one year to serve their country; 17 percent could think of no famous person or celebrity they admired (only 1 percent admired Mother Teresa, and Donald Trump received a similar
vote — indicating that religious and business leaders are among the least admired adults); 65 percent would cheat on a major exam in school, while 36 percent would lie to protect a friend who vandalized; 53 percent claimed that growing up for them is harder than it was for their parents (minority young people were
more likely to say it was easier).
For every «
under»
vote,
more than three «over»
votes were cast.
Voting ends at midnight Pacific time on December 31 and the idea needs just
under 600
more votes to make it into the second round.
Voted Australian Mother & Baby Magazine Awards 2017 Bronze for strollers
under $ 500 and Made for Mums Awards 2017 Finalist, you are sure to enjoy the accessibility Read
More...
An understanding
under which the Liberal Democrats would not
vote down a Queen's Speech is much
more likely than a formal coalition.
Let's be honest — there is no way in hell that the Democratic leadership is going to let the Republicans kill the programs
voted on
under YouCut, any
more than a Republican leadership would let a Democratic minority get away with something similar.
«
Under First Past the Post this would likely be disastrous for them, splitting the Labour
vote and allowing the Conservatives or UKIP, or whoever, to gain
more seats from them.
There's also the fact that
under a
more proportional
voting system, Labour would probably be in power right now in a progressive alliance.
If United Russia were able to secure just
under 50 per cent of the popular
vote in the party - list competition, along with the lower estimate of seats in the singe - mandate district races, it would end up with over 270 seats,
more than it now holds.
Either Lord Boateng really believes that AV departs from the principle of One Man One
Vote and that
under AV some
votes are counted
more often than others — in which case he hasn't given the matter sufficient attention: or he knows perfectly well that both assertions are nonsense, but he makes them anyway, in which case... well, you can finish the sentence.
To say that
under AV some people get
more votes than others is disingenuous.
Lord Ashcroft Polls found those aged
under 50 were highly likely to have
voted Remain, while those over 50 were much
more likely to have
voted Leave.
Under the banner of «Advancing the Democracy Agenda,» the governor's 14 - point plan lays out a familiar suite of reforms, including ethics proposals that «close the LLC loophole» in political spending, procurement reform that would
more closely monitor how state contracts are awarded and
voting reforms like same - day voter registration and early
voting.
Under the Alternative
Vote, they say, «your next MP would have to aim to get more than 50 % of the vote to be sure of winn
Vote, they say, «your next MP would have to aim to get
more than 50 % of the
vote to be sure of winn
vote to be sure of winning.
Any secretary of a political party listed on the part of the ballot paper that relates to the party
vote may, instead of making 1 or
more separate applications for recounts
under section 180 (2), apply to the Chief District Court Judge for recounts of the party
votes to be conducted in every electoral district.
Under First Past the Post this would likely be disastrous for them, splitting the Labour
vote and allowing the Conservatives (or UKIP, or whoever) to gain
more seats from them.
Saying Ed M will take it is a hunch: YouGov showed DM stronger than is likely: ex-ForSec public name recognition means he will poll better among those least likely to
vote, where turnout will be
under 25 %; that the union endorsements, the campaigning efforts and union members response to campaign have probably helped EM
more than DM.
«Our polling shows that significantly
more Scottish people think the NHS would be worse
under the union than if they
vote for independence,» she says.
According to unofficial election night totals from the New York City Board of Elections, Vance received
more than 90 percent of
votes, with just
under 10 percent of
votes going to candidates on write - in ballots, which are still being counted.
Corbyn, who has rebelled against his party
more than 500 times in his career, said MPs would not be «corralled» by whips into
voting the same way as the leadership
under a
more consensual style of management.
Nearly 94 % of those who awarded him 8 or
more out of 10 for his performance said they would
vote Conservative at the next election, falling to just
under two thirds of those who gave him 5 out of 10.
The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) topped the poll once
more with unchanged seats and 29.2 per cent of the
vote, down just
under 1 per cent.
The Conservative
vote more than halved to
under 10,000 but comfortably came second.
What I don't get is why did they win when
under the party totals, Labor clearly had nearly 800,000
more votes in the party totals as compared to the Liberal National Party?
Curtice and Steven show that a switch from the d'Hondt to the Sainte - Laguë method of allocating list seats, a method that is already enshrined in other aspects of the UK's electoral arrangements, would have produced a
more proportional result in which the SNP would not have won a majority despite winning well
under 50 % of the
vote.
In their favour I have to say that they are better than questions asking whether people are
more or less likely to
vote Labour if X was in charge, which people who would
vote Labour anyway, or wouldn't
vote Labour
under any circumstance, still say
more or less.
As the campaign for the next London Mayor officially gets
under way, election organisers say people from the suburbs are
more likely to turn out to
vote than those from the inner city.
To secure a majority of
votes under AV, candidates will need to be
more honest about points of agreement.
The mass defection of the Ukip
vote to the Tories in Leave areas could store up huge problems for Theresa May, placing the prime minister
under even
more pressure to deliver the kind of clean Brexit that her new backers, the ex-Ukippers, crave.
At the speech in Southport, Cable said that while 75 % of
under - 25s
voted remain at the 2016 referendum, 70 % of those aged 65 or
more voted for Brexit.
One of the delicate negotiations currently
under way is likely over whether supporters can find
more than one additional
vote for the measure, and to whom those
votes might belong.
The County Committee shall be constituted by the election biennially in each Election District in the County of New York, at the Primary Election held in each odd - numbered year, of two members of the County Committee plus an additional member if 300 or
more votes and less than 451
votes were cast in such Election District for governor
under the Party emblem at the last preceding gubernatorial election, and an additional member if 451 or
more votes were cast in such Election District at said time.
Ed Miliband is
under increasing pressure to back an in / out referendum on Britain's EU membership, after a survey showed
more Labour supporters are in favour of a
vote on Europe than against it.
«We must find
more ways to protect taxpayers and create good jobs, ensure access to quality, affordable health care for all New Yorkers, ensure
voting rights, protect women's rights, ensure our education system receives the resources it deserves, repair and fully fund our decaying infrastructure and MTA, and stand up for vulnerable communities
under attack by the Trump administration.»
In addition
under the new boundaries it is
more difficult for Labour than
under the old, changes in
voting patterns could eliminate notional gains or intensify them but at worst the new boundaries will be no worse for the Conservative Party and no better for Labour.
«Labour may think it's okay to use these powers as a carrot, dangling it
under communities» noses to gather
more votes at the Assembly election, but those communities who have had their heart torn out won't be at all thankful for Labour's dithering.»
Yet this is the policy position with which it is going into the Smith Commission, the group set up to fast - track
more devolution to Scotland following the No
vote in last month's referendum
under the chairmanship of Lord Smith of Kelvin.
A yes
vote on Issue 2 will make long overdue reforms to unfair and costly government practices in Ohio, while helping to get government spending
under control and making government
more accountable to taxpayers.
Putting the final deal to a
vote in parliament is a compromise of sorts but if you operate
under the assumption that the Conservatives believe they are electorally secure it
more resembles a millionaire giving a pound coin to charity: «No skin off my nose.»