-- K - 12 & higher ed: In what was clearly a tit - for - tat yesterday between the House and the Senate, the House passed the Senate's top education priority, making Bright Futures scholarships permanently cover full tuition, at almost the exact same time as the Senate passed the House's top education priority,
more vouchers for private schools and the decertification of some teachers unions.
Not exact matches
Though he has been light on details, Trump is pushing an agenda that includes
more charter
schools and a
voucher system
for students who want to attend
private schools.
More than 700,000 students in more than 1,200 New York City schools — including large high schools in all five boroughs — would face higher class sizes, have fewer teachers and lose after - school academic and enrichment programs if President - elect Trump makes good on a campaign promise to pull billions of federal dollars away from public schools to pay for private vouchers, a UFT analysis has fo
More than 700,000 students in
more than 1,200 New York City schools — including large high schools in all five boroughs — would face higher class sizes, have fewer teachers and lose after - school academic and enrichment programs if President - elect Trump makes good on a campaign promise to pull billions of federal dollars away from public schools to pay for private vouchers, a UFT analysis has fo
more than 1,200 New York City
schools — including large high
schools in all five boroughs — would face higher class sizes, have fewer teachers and lose after -
school academic and enrichment programs if President - elect Trump makes good on a campaign promise to pull billions of federal dollars away from public
schools to pay
for private vouchers, a UFT analysis has found.
Education savings accounts operate like the «partial
voucher» that Friedman envisioned
more than a decade ago, allowing families to seek out the best educational opportunities
for their students — whether those be in a
private or parochial
school or a mix of non-traditional education options.
«Position A: Government should give parents
more educational choices by providing taxpayer - funded
vouchers to help pay
for private or religious
schools.
This or similar approaches (e.g., Kingsland's proposal to grant larger
vouchers for at - risk students) are
more likely to yield wider
private school participation — and therefore greater access to quality
schools — than a strict open admissions mandate.
A midrange estimate derived from this literature is that about 10 percent of
voucher - using students from low - income families in big cities would have attended
private schools anyway (the percentage is higher
for one - year attendance and lower
for more sustained attendance).
Writing
for Chalkbeat, Dylan Peers McCoy describes how one of the nation's largest
school voucher programs has changed the
private schools that participate, leading them to focus
more intensely on student test scores.
When presented with research evidence that claims «students learn no
more in
private schools than in public
schools,» support
for school vouchers dropped by 10 percentage points, an impact almost as large as the President's.
Given the fact
for the last 40 years or so, no
more than 12 percent of students have attended
private schools at any point, and today a fraction of 1 percent of students use a
voucher or tax credit to attend
private schools, it's hard to think they're responsible
for America's creationist tendencies.
The first step Mr. Obama should take is to push
for more private -
school choice through
vouchers or scholarship programs.
Although the promise and potential of parental choice is nowhere
more evident than in the realm of technology, the arguments
for allowing students ready access to cyberschools extend to interdistrict
school choice, charter
schools,
private schools, and
vouchers as well.
To
school choice movement veteran Nina Rees, the decision to provide
more funding
for public
schools as well as
vouchers for private tuition was a virtue.
For example,
voucher - using students might have
more motivation to succeed academically, or parents of those students might be so inclined, or parents may have attended
private schools themselves and want their children to attend them, too.
Private schools deciding whether to participate in a
voucher or tax credit scholarship program must weigh multiple factors: Do they have room
for more pupils?
Once
voucher programs start to account
for the independence of high - performing
private schools, and recognize that the autonomy those
schools have is the main reason
for their high performance, you'll see
more schools participating.
That reality is becoming increasingly possible
for private schools as
vouchers, tax - credit scholarships, and education savings accounts (ESAs) reach
more families in
more states.
More commonly they funnel students into less selective religious
schools and spur the creation of new minority - dominated
private schools for voucher recipients, effectively a privatization.
What's
more, because
private management could be introduced directly into any of the nation's 80,000 public
schools,
private management might improve the quality of
schools more rapidly than would
vouchers for private schools, which must change the public
schools indirectly through competition.
As of the spring of 2001, the Center
for Education Reform estimated that 1,750 charter
schools were educating about 520,000 students in 36 states and the District of Columbia,
more than seven times the number of students in all the public and
private voucher programs combined.
Nothing wrong with any of those, and I'm all
for maximizing the variety of quality
school choices available to students — the
more so as states enact
voucher and tax - credit scholarship programs that draw
more families closer to affording
private options.
Many Democrats see portability as the first step toward federal
vouchers for private schools and argue that it would siphon dollars from
schools with high poverty and profound needs to those in
more affluent neighborhoods.
The rise of
private schools in the South and the diversion of public funds to those
private schools through
vouchers was a direct response of white communities to desegregation requirements.42 In Louisiana, the state established the Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission, which offered
vouchers of $ 360
for students attending
private school but only provided $ 257 per student to those attending public
schools.43 Over the commission's lifespan, the state devoted
more than $ 15 million in
vouchers through its tuition grant program, with the initial $ 2.5 million coming from Louisiana's Public Welfare Fund.
Alabama also enacted tuition grant state laws permitting students to use
vouchers at
private schools in the mid-1950s, while also enacting nullification statutes against court desegregation mandates and altering its teacher tenure laws to allow the firing of teachers who supported desegregation.50 Alabama's tuition grant laws would also come before the court, with the U.S. District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama declaring in Lee v. Macon County Board of Education
vouchers to be «nothing
more than a sham established
for the purpose of financing with state funds a white
school system.»
Their budget proposal would slash the Education Department's budget by
more than 13 percent, or $ 9 billion, while providing $ 1.25 billion
for school choice, including $ 250 million
for private school vouchers.2
Some may view the recent decline in
private school enrollment as evidence of a need
for more tuition
vouchers and tax credits.
We recently surveyed
more that 2,000 Indiana parents who selected
private schools for their children — some via the state's
voucher or tax - credit scholarship programs and some without state assistance — to find out why and how they chose their
schools.
No
more than 53 percent of
private schools in
voucher programs designed
for students with disabilities provided disability - related information on their websites.
Advocates
for school choice in the US (especially
for vouchers) also argue that
private schools are
more adept at providing education to parents with a variety of different academic, vocational or religious preferences
for their children.
From centrist Democrats who think that choice should only be limited to the expansion of public charter
schools (and their senseless opposition to
school vouchers, which, provide money to parochial and
private schools, which, like charters, are privately - operated), to the libertarian Cato Institute's pursuit of ideological purity through its bashing of charters and
vouchers in favor of the
voucher - like tax credit plans (which explains the irrelevance of the think tank's education team on education matters outside of higher ed), reformers sometimes seem
more - focused on their own preferred version of choice instead of on the
more - important goal of expanding opportunities
for families to provide our children with high - quality teaching and comprehensive college - preparatory curricula.
The administration achieves this reduction by slashing or eliminating funding
for scores of K - 12, higher education, and adult literacy programs by even
more than $ 9.2 billion in order to finance massive increases in defense spending coupled with, in the education context, a
more than $ 1 billion allocation
for Title I portability programs and
private school vouchers.25
So here's a glimpse into what next - to - nothing accountability
for a publicly - funded
school voucher program looks like: current law only requires
private schools with
more than 25
voucher students to make public their annual standardized test results.
School choice is the avenue
for more federalized control over education through
vouchers and tax credits, both of which will eventually render inert the only REAL choices in education right now — home
schooling and
private schooling.
In this regard, tax - credit scholarships (outside New Hampshire) are
more like
vouchers to the extent they can only be used
for private schools.
That's not the same as saying a little
more than half came from
private schools, but either way it's definitely a better deal
for taxpayers than having to pay tuition
for the 73 percent of students in the expanded statewide
voucher program whose families were already sending their kids to
private school.
Speaking on background, a staffer
for Rep. Sondy Pope, who has been outspoken in her criticism of underwriting
private school tuition with
vouchers, said «our caucus as a whole is looking» to do something even
more stringent than in Racine, but was less than optimistic about Republicans going along.
* Two grants totaling $ 50,000 went to Parents
for Educational Freedom in North Carolina, a group pushing
for more public charters
schools as well as
private school vouchers.
In 2014, the state moved to terminate an underperforming
private school from the Milwaukee
voucher program that had operated
for almost four years without accreditation — and received
more than $ 1 million in taxpayer money during that time.
Private schools in Florida are becoming vastly
more dependent on state
voucher programs that pay all or part of tuition
for students with disabilities or from low - income families, an Orlando Sentinel analysis has found.
AFC also believes that Congress and the Administration should pursue additional and bold policies to fulfill the President's promise to expand
school choice, including: a K - 12 tax credit to leverage
private money in support of scholarships
for lower income families;
vouchers for children of active duty military members so they can attend
schools of their parents» choice; Education Savings Accounts
for children in Bureau of Indian Education
schools; and
more funding
for the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program.
For more information about private school vouchers and voucher - like programs, and a state - by - state breakdown of voucher policies and legislation, visit the research sections of the websites for the National Council of State Legislatures, www.ncsl.org, or Education Commission of the States, www.ecs.o
For more information about
private school vouchers and
voucher - like programs, and a state - by - state breakdown of
voucher policies and legislation, visit the research sections of the websites
for the National Council of State Legislatures, www.ncsl.org, or Education Commission of the States, www.ecs.o
for the National Council of State Legislatures, www.ncsl.org, or Education Commission of the States, www.ecs.org.
Finally, here's the accountability mechanism currently in place when it comes to transparency
for private voucher schools» academic track record: require all
private voucher schools to administer a nationally normed standardized test of their choosing once a year, and require that
schools with 25 or
more voucher students make those test results on the aggregate a public record.
Whereas
vouchers give parents the freedom to choose a
private school for their children, using some public funding, ESAs — now a reality in five states — are
more expansive, typically allowing restricted but multiple uses of the money.
At the same time we are defunding public education, how long will it take before taxpayers are paying a billion or
more dollars a year
for a statewide
voucher system that supports unaccountable
private and religious
schools?
signs in honor of National
School Choice Week, pushing
for options including
more charter and magnet
schools, home
schooling and
vouchers for private schools.
For school choice to work, Butcher said, policymakers should give families
vouchers to attend
private schools, and allow
more charter
schools to open.
More than 40 percent strongly favored
vouchers for use at
private or religious
schools (an equal number said
vouchers were a bad idea).
He also favors adding about 20
more private schools in Milwaukee County to those now eligible
for the
voucher funding, which are all currently located within Milwaukee city limits.
Advocates
for vouchers argue that
private schools and
more competition would offer a better education
for American students.
All teachers will still be awarded raises from the same pool of money
for traditional public
schools, and Pike, the union leader, worries that pool will shrink over time, particularly as the state spends
more on
private school vouchers and charter
schools.