Not exact matches
Reports state that the elderly are
more vulnerable to financial fraud; why do you think that is and how do you ensure your
clients are protected?
I confide to Albert, «I know that law firms are under threat from all sides due to increased competition,
client cutbacks, and other factors that make your profits
more vulnerable.»
Since our
clients are largely SMBs, we can affirm that they are
more vulnerable — and sometimes resist a well - engineered backup system because they don't fully appreciate the danger and are resistant to the costs — which tend to seem very minor once they've become a ransomware victim.
Unable to explain exactly what value we add to a
client's business, we are
vulnerable to the kind of logic that «a lawyer is a lawyer is a lawyer so why pay
more for one than for another?»
Firms would be tempted to cherry - pick simpler cases rather than taking on
more difficult work and
vulnerable clients.
This is especially so when one of the
clients is less sophisticated or
more vulnerable than the other.
If you compare this with the action taken when the government first began to tackle child abuse cases, you can see that much
more can be done to protect elderly
vulnerable clients.
Fragmented treatments of patients with HP dual diagnosis can make
clients vulnerable to this, often leaving one or
more disorders untreated.
An emotionally
vulnerable client in the hands of a «zealous advocate» who is
more concerned with enriching themselves than in helping their
client is a dangerous combination.