Not exact matches
I worry that if the response
is to legislate first and ask
questions later, then in the rush to get
out in front
of the people, lawmakers will accidentally create
more problems aboard planes.
The big
question now
is whether the borrowers turned away by traditional lenders because
of the stricter rules will just abandon or delay their home - buying dreams, or seek
out more expensive loans issued by the private lenders that
are neither regulated nor required to carry mortgage insurance.
According to a fascinating recent Nature article by Tom Clynes, science has
been hard at work trying to figure
out the answer to that
question for
more than four decades with the the Study
of Mathematically Precocious Youth.
I'd sometimes correct people, but I quickly learned that the
questions were less
out of concern and
more akin to gawking, kind
of like bystanders passing an accident.
The
question is if people buy into the idea that (1) smartphones really do harm their ability to take in the world (or, at least,
are more «harmful» than «entertaining»), and (2) that they don't have the willpower to keep their noses
out of their notifications, and thus need a phone that
is designed to preempt most apps altogether.
This one from McMaster University via Coursera
is focused
more on career issues, and the topics covered sound like a top hits list
of common work
questions: «Mindshift teaches you essentials such as how to get the most
out of online learning and MOOCs, how to seek
out and work with mentors, the secrets to avoiding career ruts (and catastrophes) and general ruts in life, and insights such as the value
of selective ignorance over general competence.»
But if sales don't hold up beyond the early adopters, and a non-stem design
is out of the
question, maybe some
more subdued color options would help.
Money
is moving
out of iron ore but where it goes next
is the
more interesting
question, because it seems that some investors
are developing a taste for agriculture — a shift that might prove to
be a case
of leaving the frying pan to land in the fire.
Looking
out on the next decade, Jobs may well
be asking himself a variation
of that very
question: After creating
more than $ 150 billion in shareholder wealth, transforming movies, telecom, music, and computing (and profoundly influencing the worlds
of retail and design), what should Steve Jobs do next?
That
is becoming a
more difficult
question to answer: Apple
is running
out of iPhone surface real estate to repurpose.
The restaurant
is intended to
be a
more low - key sibling to Marta, another USHG restaurant, and while plans for additional locations haven't
been announced, Anderer told Eater it
's not
out of the
question.
«In light
of the significant concerns that have
been raised by members
of our caucus, and in light
of the irresponsible and inherently contradictory messages coming
out of the White House today, I would recommend that we withdraw consideration
of the bill today, to give us
more time to address the privacy
questions that have
been raised, as well as to get a clear statement from the administration about their position on the bill,» Schiff said on the House floor.
For example, if you
're feeling burned
out because you
're constantly correcting employees who feel that they
're not getting adequate communication, «so what»
questioning might reveal how you can
be more clear or it may reveal that employees need better training and clarity about what
is expected
of them.
These differences may seem a little «duh» for some, but laying
out the obvious
is a good start as you consider the
more complicated
question of which one
is right for you — whether you
're just beginning to make the decision or if you
're rethinking your current strategy.
For Walmart, adding its products to Amazon Alexa's voice - shopping platform
was obviously
out of the
question since the two companies
are fierce rivals and Amazon's voice commerce approach appears to
be more closed off.
Besides giving you a ton
of content inspiration, topical
questions can
be an effective niche research tool as well as competitor research tactic (e.g., find
out which
questions your competitors» customers
are asking and answer them
more effectively.)
Question, in all
of this, has
been, do we get
out in front
of the problem, and address it before the imbalances become
more inevitable and difficult to deal with, or not.
However, it
is important to point
out that these tokens aren't exactly shares
of the company, yet as the start - up in
question becomes
more profitable, so will these tokens which can
be traded on exchanges for real money.
Zuckerberg frequently mentioned the things that Facebook has already done post-Cambridge Analytica to fix its privacy policies, and by the end
of the day, the
questions were getting
more and
more repetitive as people ran
out of new things to ask.
Tibor has trained hundreds
of sales reps and he has some great advice, from explaining how to get
more out of your selling time to ways you can focus on communicating to your customer that you
are listening to them by asking thoughtful
questions.
The
question of what you want to get
out of your business
is far
more personal than it
is for younger people, who most likely have a strictly monetary goal.
My
question...
is getting peoples insights into whether to diversify some
more or something different altogether... there
is simply so much time ahead
of him, its hard to pin down a strategy, even the Vanguard Retirement 2065
is not far enough away to accommodate the time in front
of him, he'll only
be 56 by then, but I want to help him and set the strategy
out before I shuffle off the mortal coil so he doesn't really need to think about pensions etc. as he grows up, comments / suggestions welcome... Cheers
The
question facing Puerto Rico
was how to get
more money
out of Walmart without actually targeting the corporation (that would
be unconstitutional.)
As China and the United States got closer to a full - blown trade war on Wednesday, with China threatening to impose tariffs on 106
more U.S. products after a similar U.S. move on Tuesday, one major
question is looming larger than ever over the world's two biggest economies: Once you
're in a trade war, how do you get
out of it?
In a
more perfect House
of Commons, such a backbencher — and this
is not to single Mr. Toet
out, only to use him as a convenient example — would
be in the House during
Question Period to do two things: represent his constituents and hold the government to account.
Some election promises can
be delayed, but there
is little room for
more spending cuts and tax increases
are out of the
question.
I
was pointing that
out to the readers at large — to make the point that because there
is no claim, and many
of the sources
are unknown, that these writings often simply describe earlier purported events, that
's all the
more reason to
question them.
Family
is in your heart and can
be more than flesh and blood... all religious beliefs aside, go
out and get some friends and
be a part
of something... and you wont need to ask this
question.
There
are more stories
out of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility... Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the question
of the bible that have
been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have
been shown to have any credibility...
Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the question
Of course I
'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the
questions.
Far too often, atheists
are merely asking
questions, not
out of a general interest or pursuit, but
more to try and prove superiority»
He
is particularly helpful with articulating or clarifying some
of the theology behind the prose
more accurately, as well as asking me hard
questions, testing my work
out.
It wasn't the summer that brought an end to my doubt, but it
was the summer I encountered a different Jesus, a Jesus who requires
more from me than intellectual assent and emotional allegiance; a Jesus who associated with sinners and infuriated the religious; a Jesus who broke the rules and refused to cast the first stone; a Jesus who gravitated toward sick people and crazy people, homeless people and hopeless people; a Jesus who preferred story to exposition and metaphor to syllogism; a Jesus who answered
questions with
more questions, and demands for proof with demands for faith... a Jesus who healed each person differently and saved each person differently; a Jesus who had no list
of beliefs to check off, no doctrinal statements to sign, no surefire way to tell who
was «in» and who
was «
out»; a Jesus who loved after
being betrayed, healed after
being hurt, and forgave while
being nailed to a tree; a Jesus who asked his disciples to do the same...
It
is more because I want Anthony Burgess blotted
out as a flaw in the universe: a terrible sin
of presumption, orthodoxy might counter, for who
am I to
question my worth to God?
, though again this
is more protest than
question, for we know we haven't done anything monstrous enough to deserve to
be singled
out for this kind
of horrible punishment.
It
is a strange picture that we
are given
of Jesus during these first days in the temple: arguing freely with Sadducees, scribes, and Pharisees; parrying
more or less subtle attempts to lure him into statements that could
be used against him; answering sincere
questions and approving good answers to his own
questions; pronouncing fiery invectives against influential teachers who opposed him; lamenting the failure
of Jerusalem to respond to his challenge; and then calmly pointing
out to his disciples the tiny but sacrificial offering
of a poor widow.
The
question is presented as part
of a larger discussion on the nature
of philosophical and imperial authority, yet it
is clear that the imperial part
of the argument
is not necessary to its main thrust, as a result standing
out all the
more.
The very appetite proceeding from labor and peace
of mind
is gone: we eat just enough to keep us alive: our sleep
is disturbed by the most frightful dreams; sometimes I start awake, as if the great hour
of danger
was come; at other times the howling
of our dogs seems to announce the arrival
of the enemy: we leap
out of bed and run to arms; my poor wife with panting bosom and silent tears takes leave
of me, as if we
were to see each other no
more; she snatches the youngest children from their beds, who, suddenly awakened, increase with their innocent
questions the horror
of the dreadful moment.
Sometimes my doubt
is treated like an antidote — people find solidarity and healing; they ask
questions they'd
been afraid to ask
out loud; they dream
of a bolder,
more examined faith; the brave ones say they don't want to
be fixed.
And back then, wasn't it the fans wrapped up in «theories» who
were ultimately disappointed when they found
out that Lost wasn't really concerned with answering the thousands
of questions it had raised — that it
was less a heady show about theology and science and
more an emotional show about its characters and the human experience?
At a
more profound level, the description ofeconomic man
is too simple to answer the fundamental
questions of what residents
of industrial economies do and should want to get
out of their abundant consumption and their generally quite specialised work.
The effect
of the medicine
was violent, and I
was confined to my bed several days; but, youth and a strong constitution prevailing, I once
more crawled
out, to ask myself the cruel
question, «Whither I should go?»
It reminds us that our most pressing constitutional
questions (on slavery and secession)
were settled
out of court; that it took
more than a wiser judge to reverse our most villainous chief justice (Roger Taney); and that our Constitution's most consequential interpreter wasn't a robed philosopher - king but a self - taught lawyer from Kentucky by way
of Illinois.
The Kenyan President stood up to the American President after his chastisement, and pointed
out that Kenyans do not agree with the enlightened superiority
of the superpower in
question, and
are concerned with much
more basic aspects
of civil society, and affirmed their right to govern their own nation.
It
is manifest that most
of the protesters had not read the item in
question, having simply reacted to the alert sent
out on the internet (
more than half the protests
were e-mailed), and quite a few
are confused about who wrote the offending article.
As for the
question of why interreligious dialogue should have had its first major public
outing in the United States, and why it has flourished here
more than in any other country since, this
is slightly
more complicated.
Asking hard
questions or pointed
questions is much
more effective when they arise
out of a relationship
of trust and affection.
Moreover, scientific and technical progress in the next ten years will introduce unprecedented achievements In this field and it
is no exaggeration to assert here and now that teleconimuni - cation will play a primary role both on the national and on world levels and it could also
be pointed
out that the most difficult problems
are not generally
of a purely technical nature and that telecommunications
questions should
more and
more command the attention
of governmental authorities at the highest level. . . .
Becoming as self - transcendence in virtue
of absolute
Being, therefore, does not exclude but includes the
question of the
more precise sequence
of stages
of the becoming which opens
out limitlessly.
It
is one
of those
questions that seems
more and
more to
be proving, a secularist would say, how
out of touch Catholics
are with the modern world.
The God
of the Bible requires faith — reasoning everything
out in detail to the point where there
are no
more questions or mysteries would eliminate the need for faith.