Not exact matches
Historically,
white artists — especially
male — have had
more opportunities to show their work than people of colour and other marginalised groups.
«Soul of a Nation», which after Tate will tour to Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art and the Brooklyn Museum in the US, takes place against a background of the increasing prominence of African American
artists of the 1960s and»70s, as well as the art world's
more gradual attempt to debunk the history of modernism as a
white western
male phenomenon.
The approaching season of museum shows promises
more unfamiliar material than usual, with exceptionally high ratio of exhibitions devoted to
artists who are not
white or
male.
While it may be easy to paint the «creative differences» between Vergne and Molesworth as one of the director favoring blue - chip
white male artists, and the curator wanting to create a
more inclusive platform for women and
artists of color, what can be said about the urged retirement of the long - term senior curator of color, who had been doing that work all along?»
Male art sales better and is
more charismatic for the US public, therefore MOMA is
more interested in [
white]
Male artists than women.
A fictional
artist, a 30 - something - year - old well - educated black lesbian
artist from Georgia (now from Detroit) who is actually a 53 - year - old
white male artist, was one of the only nine participating black
artists / groups in the Whitney Biennial (whose totally contributors numbered
more than 100)?
To Miranda and PDMinBC: Sure, some
artists are «better» or
more popular than others, but to believe that
white male artists deserve 56 % of the solo exhibitions due to having «
more talent» is pure ignorance.
One month ago I promised to feature one
artist per month - if not
more - who is not a cis
white male.