Sentences with phrase «more wide player»

bring in 1 more wide player in the...

You'd be struggling for a left - back and I'd have done it differently to include more wide players in defence and midfield obviously.

Not exact matches

But unlike in the personal computer or server market, where Intel and AMD fought for dominance (more truthfully, AMD tried to at least achieve profitability), or the smartphone market where Qualcomm has taken out competitors ranging from Texas Instruments and Freescale on the application processor side (leaving Apple, Samsung, Broadcom and Mediatek standing), this market has a much wider variety of players known for their embedded processors and microcontroller.

In Mahrez case, he is definitely a wide attacking player, who goes by opponents as if they are not there, has good technical abilities, a wonderful left foot, and does score goals, probably would score more in a team like Arsenal.

We looked more balanced when we had brought The OX on and had two actual wide players

Wenger believes in his no. 1 striker giroud and also believes that he only needs one more, that is a player that can back up giroud and play wide when needed.

The youngster can play as part of a two man strike pairing but more often than not plays out wide as part of a front three and the Barca man has 39 goals over the past season and a half and whilst it would clearly be something of a shock for Arsene Wenger to persuade the player to move to the Emirates it appears he is still very much a target.

Perez is more in competition with the Welbeck position wide player / forward, which i think we have sufficient players.

I only wish to focus on those who can play in the CF position (as that's what everyone's getting bent out of shape about) but it is clear we have wide players who can score and we have players who can do so from midfield, some of whom are still developing — like Wilshere, Ramsay, the Ox — and from whom most of expect to see more and more this season.

Lucas Perez joined as a striker, but having operate wide in our side this term, I see him as more of a wide player as far as our team is concerned.

He is not a player we really needed, because he is not a true DM and we are more in need of a regular goal scorer, either from the wide position or up front.

Am willing to chip in a tenner for a teach yourself Cantonese course for the whippet... they would cough up north of 20m for him but about the only ones... If we bring in a top quality wide right attacking player then I will be more than happy... Though I would still feel easier with a solid centre back addition

Considering that Campbell and Podolski are both more or less wide forwards, we can probably expect a like - for - like replacement but with more quality, and maybe even two such players if Theo leaves.

Point is, given the players we have available to us, a 442 suits us more than player a 4231 or 343 that Arsene has been playin that forces players wide that don't do anything useful there (Iwobi)

Alexis had started slowly but he started to work his magic and have more of an influence, almost latching on to a Cazorla pass and forcing the Dortmund players to double and triple up on him in wide areas.

Harkless is also even more athletic than Johnson and his size gives him the ability to guard a wider range of players.

as long as king jack is alright i mean the team plays around jack so what ever will we do without our main man doesn't matter our slow dm are even more exposed doesn't matter if our best player last season is a showdow of himself since he is playing higher up and doesn't matter one of the best playmakers has been shifted out wide that all means nothing what matters is king jack stays fit and all listen to his commands in wenger we trust

Thus formations which allow us to draw players wide or out onto our defence are FAR more effectual for our current team.

Personally I would love a 4 -3-3 holding wich has the wide players high up the pitch but the central players are more playing half way as cm and the dm behind the D.

We could go for a younger CF who would cost roughly the same, maybe a bit more but this player would be able to play out wide as well... Lacazette.

Finally, a wide player on the right earlier in the game would have provided more opportunities for a goal.

Still, in a slightly more realistic move, two superb wide - players available for more affordable prices are now being linked with the club as Jose Mourinho may be set to let Schurrle leave.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

There should be times when our wide players and full backs should cross the ball more for Giroud.

the problem also lies with other players especially those playing wide they need to get more crosses in hope in jan wenger gets someone like mahrez / yarmalenko would make giroud better

«I think of course he is naturally more of a central midfielder and I pushed him out wide for a while because I believe we have seen many times that when players are pushed against the line they need to shorten their technique.

Toral is still a kid and more attacking, a number 10 or wide player.

The Daily Mirror also state that Tottenham are keen on wide - man Victor Moses and that may be a more likely sale this summer than the departures of the previous two players named by this source.

Gnabry is an exciting talent but he has had a few injuries, let him get over that issue on loan and not end up being injured when we need him because we didn't buy... Put Welbeck as a wide attacker as I believe Wenger will deploy him out wide to learn more and to work on his shooting, like Theo was a wide player for most of his development with Wenger.

Had we had Theo and Giroud on at the same time we'd have had two players getting into the box when the ball was wide and alot more runs through good channels (exactly what Welbeck lacks).

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

WENGER has alredy stated that his best position is in the MIDDLE.But to learn his trad a player has to play wide.Cause while playing wide (in tight space) you become more skilfull in defence and attak.ANYWAY A.M.N did extremly well out wide.

It's hardly surprising he has more assists when they have several players who can score from 20 - 30 yards with much more regularity than any of our players can (let alone 5 yards) and he get's more tap - ins because their wide players dominate the wings far more than ours do, which could account for his higher shot accuracy.

8 goals is modest but the the same as Remy, more than other forwards like Balotelli, Falcao, Jovetic, Dzeko, Drogba, Sturridge and way better return than other players in comparable wide right / left starting positions like Willian, Young, Nasri.

We then lose a proper wide player who could stretch the defense and create more space for the midfielders to work with.

And it is clear in the system we play that of the two wide players we deploy, it is Alexis who has the greater freedom to roam licence, DB plays in a much more orthodox up and down role.

I consider Welbeck more of a wide player than CF. I mean how can any Manager say we can win the title with only one striker.

Would Lacazette be happy playing as a wide player for a season or 2 while he adapts to the EPL and develops a bit more?

If he can stay fit he is already more useful than the majority of AFC wide players.

In both we have two supposed wide players and 3 central midfielders with one of them to be more disciplined.

There is another option, one relying less on overt regulation, and more on changing the demands of the game on athletes while opening the game up even further: make the field bigger, both longer and wider, and open up the offensive game by making players run more.

Nevertheless, there seems to be interest and time will tell if it develops into something more serious with Milan needing a consistent source of goals from their leading striker and an individual better suited to linking up play and feeding off the service of two wide players.

I am not just talking about our wide forward either, although the boss does have a tricky choice on whether to use the pace, power and work rate of Danny Welbeck on the other side to Alexis Sanchez, or whether to go with a more technical player like Santi Cazorla or Mesut Ozil.

The Wildcat Baseball Camp covers a wide variety of skills designed to make each camper a more well rounded ball player.

His position is out wide, more effective there, has the pace, but still lacking some of the technical skill in possession of the ball and his still set is that of a wide player

I consider Alexis more of a wide player.

More difficult to accept were disruptions such as four players» involvement in the Academy - wide honor - code violations of 1976 and a written ultimatum to Smith from the top brass that required seven victories in 1977, including one over Navy, for him to keep his job.

However he could be a top Deep Lying Playmaker which is more of the role he has been doing, he has the STR to hold players off when he has the ball and he has a wide passing range with a respectable pass completion.

McDermott should bring back something similar to the Wide 9 that the players loved when Schwartz was here, and that means that players like Dareus will be able to penetrate upfield and make plays (and probably do it more enthusiastically as a result).

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole