Having
more women in leadership positions was the second most cited (named by 34 % of women and 31 % of men).
Research already suggests that companies with
more women in leadership roles have better work - life policies, smaller gender gaps in executive compensation, and more women in midlevel management.
She also benefited from formal leadership training such as departmental programs, especially opportunities made available to support
more women in leadership.
We need
more women in leadership positions in the marijuana and drug - reform movement.
It is important for organizations wishing to hire
more women in leadership roles to evaluate the gender bias in their organization, with a first step being an audit of the compensation practices for women and men.
Having
more women in leadership positions on science faculty could also speed up the cycle, creating role models for girls and younger women.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, considered a potential 2020 presidential contender, suggested that
more women in leadership could have prevented the 2008 financial crisis.
«Ste. Michelle Wine Estates and Women of the Vine & Spirits share a parallel vision of developing
more women in leadership roles across our entire industry.
«I knew the financial outperformance of companies with
more women in leadership, being the executive sponsor of the global women's forum at my Fortune 500 tech company,» Brand told Crunchbase News in an email.
indicates that companies with
more women in leadership have higher returns on capital, greater innovation, increased productivity and higher employee retention and satisfaction.
For women, the budget aspires to more equal wages,
more women in leadership, and less gender based violence.
More women in leadership roles could help alleviate this problem.
Sandberg said more business owners and leaders need to be aware of that bias and should focus on hiring
more women in leadership roles.
According to a study conducted by Baloonr, about 35 percent of respondents said the best way to addressing the issue in the startup tech worldis to put
more women in leadership roles.
We need
more women in leadership positions.»
Not exact matches
Accenture has also worked on ways to get
more women into senior
leadership positions (they've changed the interview process so that candidates of both genders get to know
more members
in the executive ranks) and to retain them (implementing a one - year no - travel policy for employees who are new mothers and fathers).
Women consistently rated better than men in overall leadership ability; the higher up in the organization the leaders were, the bigger the discrepancy between men and women, and the more the women s
Women consistently rated better than men
in overall
leadership ability; the higher up
in the organization the leaders were, the bigger the discrepancy between men and
women, and the more the women s
women, and the
more the
women s
women shone.
Those numbers seem to be shifting as
more women hold
leadership roles
in business, says Grossblatt.
Men and
women with deeper voices are
more likely to land
in leadership positions and are generally perceived as a greater authority.
More than one - third of Uber's global workforce is
women, but the percentage shrinks when it comes to
women in technical roles and
leadership positions at the company.
There have been a variety of studies showing that
women in leadership roles equates to better company performance, including a report from Credit Suisse that says that companies with
more than one
woman on their boards have outperformed those with no
women on their boards
in the stock market.
While the findings may look discouraging for advocates of
more women in management and
leadership positions, Srivastava says that «the takeaway should not be that having
more women in management roles is unimportant or undesirable.»
Currently they release information on the number of
women in their total workforce and
in their
leadership roles and publish
more detailed information about gender balance internally, but are still working with lawyers to navigate the stricter data collection and protection measures
in Germany, where the company is based, and other countries where their employees work, SAP's chief diversity and inclusion officer Anka Wittenberg told Fortune.
There's a
more existential reason we need
more women in technology
leadership roles.
More and more women are actively engaging in the tech industry in hopes to spur leadership opportunit
More and
more women are actively engaging in the tech industry in hopes to spur leadership opportunit
more women are actively engaging
in the tech industry
in hopes to spur
leadership opportunities.
The letter urges five overall guiding principles and 10 best practices
in order to get
more women into the field generally and
leadership positions, including: getting executives and boards to make gender diversity a priority; establishing mentorship programs that connect
women with life sciences executives; and doing a better job tracking where female talent goes within biopharma firms, among other suggestions.
For one, there's a business case behind it: The fact is, no matter the industry, no matter what country, the
more women you have
in leadership, the better the returns, and the profitability of a company.
«Throughout my 14 years working
in television, I have never experienced a
more positive and thoughtful atmosphere than FOX News Channel, thanks to the strong
leadership of [FOX News Chairman & CEO] Roger Ailes, who has created the best working environment a
woman and mother could ask for.
«It's important that
more women advance to
leadership positions
in the government so they can consider other
women - owned businesses.
Already, thanks to the
leadership of the bureau, we're seeing men and
women in uniform who are getting
more protections against fraud and deception when it comes to financial practices.
In fact, women have had more success in claiming top leadership spots within the foundation world than any other powerful U.S. secto
In fact,
women have had
more success
in claiming top leadership spots within the foundation world than any other powerful U.S. secto
in claiming top
leadership spots within the foundation world than any other powerful U.S. sector.
One tangible result of this
leadership shift
in philanthropy has been
more attention and
more money for gender equity and
women's empowerment issues
in recent years.
Dow Jones studied
more than 20,000 venture - backed companies over a five - year period and found that those companies with at least one
woman executive were
more likely to succeed than those with only men
in leadership positions.
Getting
more women in executive and board positions will do
more to bring other
women into
leadership roles than almost anything else.
Firms could do
more to include
women among their
leadership, Krawcheck said, and she questioned an idea outlined
in the bestselling book by Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg, «Lean In,» which suggested women push harder to get ahea
in the bestselling book by Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg, «Lean
In,» which suggested women push harder to get ahea
In,» which suggested
women push harder to get ahead.
Of course limited partners can also empower
women in leadership roles and now,
more than ever before, there is ample opportunity to back firms that feature gender diversity.
«We applaud Walmart's significant
leadership role
in supporting
women - owned businesses by making Women Owned logo products more visible and readily available.&r
women - owned businesses by making
Women Owned logo products more visible and readily available.&r
Women Owned logo products
more visible and readily available.»
While the percentage of
women in leadership roles
in big enterprise is grossly out of balance, there has been a lot
more progress
in small businesses.
Through having
more women use their investment power to invest
in the types of fund managers,
leadership teams, financial returns companies they want to see
more of
in the world, we believe, it will drive the initial impetus to change the gender - gap
in venture capital.
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female
leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian
women teaching
in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian
women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male
leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries
more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant
in one moment, but important enough to display
in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
But — nobody
in that church
leadership group said anything at all after the comment about men being
more reasonable than
women and
women being emotional and not rational.»
Particularly
in our current culture, with sexual abuse stories being exposed within the Church, it's
more important than ever for
women to be represented when it comes to making decisions
in leadership on behalf of the community.
And yet
women who showcase
leadership in the Church today are
more likely be accused as a Jezebel than celebrated as a Deborah.
Some of the
more conservative - minded attendees had left early on when Bell insisted on
women in leadership.
In small congregations which pay all benefits, which meet all salary guidelines, and which are not exploitative, the fact remains that there is more openness to the leadership of women than is found in large churche
In small congregations which pay all benefits, which meet all salary guidelines, and which are not exploitative, the fact remains that there is
more openness to the
leadership of
women than is found
in large churche
in large churches.
In addition to general cultural dynamics, there are other reasons why large churches are
more resistant to
women's
leadership; these reasons are related to some of the basic differences between small and large churches.
But the increasing presence of
women with feminist sympathies
in positions of
leadership in the church may open the way to
more radical changes
in due course.
So the point I want to make today is not that all who subscribe to patriarchy are abusive, but that patriarchy
in a religious environment, just as
in any environment, has a negative effect on the whole community and creates a cultural climate
more susceptible to abuse than one characterized by mutuality and shared
leadership between men and
women.
Most
women in Western Society use contraception, are seeking education, are seeking
leadership positions and do not have the same beliefs and values because they simply have
more options now.
Or maybe you are the first
woman executive
in a corporation where the existing idea of management is
more a matter of headship than
leadership.