Sentences with phrase «more written judgments»

The sweeping change is proposed by Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, who has issued draft guidance that would allow thousands more written judgments to be published.

Not exact matches

«The chanciness is part of the lasting magic of gay life,» writes Browning, «a sort of radical plot twist that characterizes queer life and sets aside so many conventions of social judgment, class, race, and attitude, supplanting them with a direct and naive faith that bonds of great value can be forged on nothing more than instinct....

Later in his life, in one of the last pieces he wrote on Nazism, Bettelheim was to make an even more extreme judgment.

In political and social thought, no Christian has ever written a more profound defense of the democratic idea and its component parts, such as the dignity of the person, the sharp distinction between society and the state, the role of practical wisdom, the common good, the transcendent anchoring of human rights, transcendent judgment upon societies, and the interplay of goodness and evil in human individuals and institutions.

The government is also considering whether there should be «greater flexibility» for teachers to use their judgment to assess pupils» ability in writing — this seems to relate to the use of a «best fit» model for assessments, rather than the current «secure fit» (more on that here).

We will show you where you need to provide more support for your arguments and offer a formative unfavorable judgment that will help you better your writing.

Writing a literary critique of an article is more difficult compared to other kinds of academic essays, because it requires critical thinking and your ability to come up with an independent judgment on a topic.

«No judgment shall be rendered for any deficiency under a note secured by a first deed of trust or first mortgage for a dwelling of not more than four units, in any case in which the trustor or mortgagor sells the dwelling for less than the remaining amount of the indebtedness due at the time of sale with the written consent of the holder of the first deed of trust or first mortgage.

They are, as Graham wrote, in the «best judgment of Wall Street... worth more dead than alive.»

I'm not a professional blogger, in the sense that my incomes are from a source that has nothing to do with the 2.0 world However I think it's a good thing, as it allows me to be more free to make my choices based on my tastes and this also makes me independent in judgment, if I did the travel blogger by profession I would be practically forced to have to monetize all my trip and each of my post and this is in contrast with the passion that I put into traveling and writing.

You agree not to engage in any of the following prohibited activities: (i) copying, distributing, or disclosing any part of the Service in any medium, including without limitation by any automated or non-automated «scraping»; (ii) using any automated system, including without limitation «robots,» «spiders,» «offline readers,» etc., to access the Service in a manner that sends more request messages to the Company servers than a human can reasonably produce in the same period of time by using a conventional on - line web browser (except that Humble Bundle grants the operators of public search engines revocable permission to use spiders to copy materials from Humble Bundle for the sole purpose of and solely to the extent necessary for creating publicly available searchable indices of the materials, but not caches or archives of such materials); (iii) transmitting spam, chain letters, or other unsolicited email; (iv) attempting to interfere with, compromise the system integrity or security or decipher any transmissions to or from the servers running the Service; (v) taking any action that imposes, or may impose in our sole judgment an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on our infrastructure; (vi) uploading invalid data, viruses, worms, or other software agents through the Service; (vii) collecting or harvesting any personally identifiable information, including account names, from the Service; (viii) using the Service for any commercial solicitation purposes; (ix) impersonating another person or otherwise misrepresenting your affiliation with a person or entity, conducting fraud, hiding or attempting to hide your identity; (x) interfering with the proper working of the Service; (xi) accessing any content on the Service through any technology or means other than those provided or authorized by the Service; (xii) bypassing the measures we may use to prevent or restrict access to the Service, including without limitation features that prevent or restrict use or copying of any content or enforce limitations on use of the Service or the content therein; (xiii) sell, assign, rent, lease, act as a service bureau, or grant rights in the Products, including, without limitation, through sublicense, to any other entity without the prior written consent of such Products» (defined below) licensors; (xiv) circumventing Service limitations on the number of Products you may purchase, including, without limitation, creating multiple accounts and purchasing a total number of Products through such multiple accounts which exceed the per - user limitations; or (xv) except as otherwise specifically set forth in a licensor's end user license agreement, as otherwise agreed upon by a licensor in writing or as otherwise allowed under applicable law, distributing, transmitting, copying (other than re-installing software or files previously purchased by you through the Service on computers, mobile or tablet devices owned by you, or creating backup copies of such software or files for your own personal use) or otherwise exploiting the Products (defined below) in any manner other than for your own private, non-commercial, personal use.

«I think King.com has a strong argument that most of the consumer base in question (e.g., those purchasing on app stores, etc.) are impulse buyers, and thus may be more inclined to make snap judgments based on simple word usage like «candy» and «saga»,» he or she wrote.

I strive to write informed observation and make judgments that are more than just opinion.

Whether Judith has more publications than me is irrelevant - I fully expect her to at the very different stages in our careers, but I also have the technical background to make judgments on much of what she writes about here.

Whether acknowledged or not, they are an accepted part of the judgment - writing process and do not, without more, render the proceeding unfair.

Third, I agree that such a writing style, when used sparingly and appropriately, makes judgments more accessible.

«The plaintiffs seem to suggest that where five separate motions for summary judgment are brought against it, an unsuccessful plaintiff should not be responsible for more than one - fifth of its own substantial indemnity costs to any one successful party,» Brown wrote.

As wrote in a recent post, what I'm saying here about lawyers» strengths and weaknesses is not a value judgment about which skills are more important.

Most famously, in Chevron v. NRDC, Justice Stevens» wrote a majority opinion for the Court that sternly rebuked the D.C. Circuit for substituting its judgment for that of the Reagan EPA, which sought to give industry more flexibility in meeting their Clean Air Act obligations.

Now that public access to judgments and written reasons is so much easier (thanks to the Web), personal privacy will become that much more of an issue.

Judgments, as we know, are the template for a lot of bad writing: they sacrifice readability to formalism, they include far more than you really need to know, and they put the most important point at the end.

At time of writing, the McLachlin Court has handed down more than a hundred unanimous constitutional law decisions that meet some minimal threshold (arbitrarily but not unreasonably: reserved judgments over 5,000 words in length), of which fewer than one in six attracts this anonymous treatment.

Justice Rothstein wrote the judgment of the 7 member court: Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation v. Canada, 2009 SCC 9... [more]

Ontario Court of Appeal Justice Robert Blair delivered an «extremely well written» judgment in the Livent matter, which may indicate that he anticipates... Read more

«Looking at the opinions the individual judges wrote last year (as distinct from judgments they simply signed on to without comment) Chief Justice McLachlin and Justice Charron were the most solid majoritarians in the sense that they did the least concurring and dissenting, both wrote a total of nine majority or unanimous opinions, and Justice Charron wrote more unanimous judgments than anyone else — five.»

It is invaluable when writing a judgment because in explaining the nature of the case and the facts found by the court, a chronological recitation of the facts makes the judgment much more understandable.

In spite of differing outcomes, the unanimous ruling, written by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, provides a clear and ringing endorsement for summary judgment — going as far as promoting a «shift in culture» away from expensive and time - consuming trials and towards swifter and more accessible justice.

As a result more judges were reserving their decision in order to review his / her notes and the law before issuing their written reasons for judgment.

But that's not necessarily a bad thingifthat frees up those associates to do more brief writing, analysis, or other higher order tasks that require judgment and strategic thinking.

The decision written by Abella was joined by only two other judges (Justice Michael Moldaver wrote a concurring judgment, joined by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, which was more narrow in scope, while Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and Justice Thomas Cromwell were in dissent and concluded a general warrant was sufficient even for seizure of prospective text messages, because they are stored on the databases of service providers).

However, after the CJC recommendations were adopted the judgments were written so as to be more sensitive to privacy concerns, and the court resumed putting them on its site and sending them to CanLII for publication.

It is even more difficult to be objective when you are writing about yourself and so you may trap yourself into poor judgment.

Signed written agreements reached in mediation are enforceable as court judgments under California Code of Civil... [Read More...]

As the judgment in Yorta Yorta makes clear, the weight given by the courts to written over oral evidence is ultimately a matter of which evidence the court considers to be more reliable.