Sentences with phrase «most mlp»

MLP (Master Limited Partnership) and LP (Limited Partnership)-- Most MLP and LP are in the energy sector, like oil.

Most MLP managements in a similar situation would just keep paying out a big dividend and drive off the cliff.

In contrast, most MLP ETFs file their own income tax returns and pay taxes before they pay out any distributions.

Currently, most MLPs operate in the energy, natural resources or real estate sectors.

And in fact, by law most MLPs currently operate in the energy industry, providing and managing resources: One example is Texas - based Genesis Energy L.P., which provides pipeline transportation, refinery services, and supply and logistics support services for oil companies.

Unlike blue chip dividend stocks and dividend aristocrats, which grow their dividends primarily as a result of earnings growth, most MLPs need to borrow money or issue new units to continue growing their distributable cash flows since their partnership agreements usually call for all available cash on hand to be distributed.

However, most MLPs now make the K - 1 available as soon as possible on their corporate websites.

Like most MLPs, Sunoco Logistics is a pipeline company.

Because most MLPs pay out cash flows from depleting oil and gas reserves that need to be replaced with new wells, these companies need continued access to cheap capital just to sustain their dividends.

Not exact matches

Investors like MLP because like REIT, a MLP has to give most of its earning back to investors in terms of dividends.

Master limited partnerships represented by the Alerian MLP Index, a market cap — weighted, float - adjusted index composite of the 50 most prominent energy master limited partnerships (MLPs).

The most recent rally occurred in December and January, lifting the MLP index by about 15 % and leaving them up about 50 % (or about 65 % on a total return basis) from their early 2016 trough.

Fortunately, for the majority of MLPs, including most of those Evergreen owns for clients, this is either a non-event or of minimal impact.

Most recently, with the energy sector singled out for special punishment, I'm getting a lot of questions about mid-stream Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) as a source of yield.

MLPs are among the most complicated investments available in ETFs today.

I must say this collection ties in perfectly with the New MLP Friendship is Magic series which I also think is the intention since most of the polish names references each pony in it.

So, CDs typically yield the least, while REITs and MLPs pay out the most.

In other words, the MLP itself is not liable for corporate taxes on its revenues, as most incorporated businesses are; instead, its owners / unitholders / investors are only personally liable for income taxes on their portions of the MLP's earnings.

Most equity REITs and MLPs meet this requirement easily.

MLPs sure can be complicated investments — most are too complex for me to get comfortable with, and I can't help but think back to what happened to MLPs during the energy crisis in the 1980s.

There's even more tax fun in the land of Master Limited Parterships: most of the money that comes back to you is not an accounting profit; most of the money that MLPs distribute to unit holders is untaxed.

You can buy a collection of energy MLPs yielding 8 - 12 % annually that give you income monthly income to make new investments (most energy MLPs make quarterly distributions, but a diversified collection of them should give you income monthly).

Employee benefit plans and most other organizations exempt from US federal income tax, such as individual retirement accounts and other retirement plans, may be subject to income tax on their unrelated business taxable income («UBTI») if investing directly in an MLP through such a plan.

there are dodgy mlps, certainly, and those in fact are the ones that are most popular / fastest movers — LINE and ARLP come to mind — brains raised on on biotech and dot.com growthstock models must see fast growth to fire synapses at all; but there are honest to goodness businesses in the segment as well; and the model they use — pay out all cashflow + issue new equity for growth — is neither «fancy» (this used to be the standard British model of stock - market capitalism until 1980s or so) nor unsustainable (most manage 50/50 equity / debt split and total debt well under 4x cashflow).

Some businesses like MLPs and REITs can go above 85 %, but for most other companies, this is the red zone.

We have represented many of the largest and most active MLPs in a variety of areas, including initial public offerings (IPOs) and other capital markets offerings, drop - downs, mergers and acquisitions and commercial contracts, as well as in tax, finance, regulatory, environmental and litigation matters.