Most academic economists accepted, at least behind closed doors, that it was a sound policy idea.
Like
most academic economists, Mr. Cowen focuses on the next quarter - century rather than the next quarter.
Not exact matches
«There is extensive
academic literature suggesting that populism is bad for economic growth and prosperity but also for
most investment classes,»
economists at Macquarie wrote last week.
And it's simply this: For instance, if you look back 50 or 80 years ago, you could say that
economists,
academic economists, Nobel Prize winning level
economists, were among the
most brilliant people we had in this country.
For
most economists from the official, financial or even
academic sectors, career risk is simply too great.
It is therefore no shock that
economists and business
academics are subverting the social movement to demand corporate accountability by dismantling some of their legal advantage —
most notably, personhood rights for corporations.
That issue is crucial for Professor Gordon of Northwestern, arguably the
most influential pessimist among
academic economists today.
Most importantly our
academic economist's whole hypothesis is founded on an easily verifiable falsehood - NLNG was incorporated in May 1989 and the dual exchange rate system only happened between 1995 and 1998.
Again
most analysts and
academics know that if anyone wanted to demonstrate the strange hypothesis that multiple and widely divergent exchange rates do not affect foreign investment, he could cite the evidence of more recent years, but that obviously not being consistent with the facts, our
economist then went over two decades back to 1994 to cite an exception, a single investment in an environment of otherwise grossly low investment, in a sector where people invest even in times of war, to justify a faulty hypothesis!
In a comparison of American, Dutch, Israeli, and Russian students headed by
economist Jan Magnus of Tilburg University in the Netherlands, Americans proved the least tolerant of
academic dishonesty and Russians were the
most tolerant.
Although Gaetz's bill does not include fiscal expenditures, as noted in the main text (§ IV, supra), in reviewing the start time /
academic achievement studies undertaken by fellow
economists, Columbia University Assistant Professor of Finance and Economics Jonah Rockoff and the Walter H. Annenberg Professor of Education Policy, Professor of Economics, and Professor of Education at the University of Michigan, Brian Jacob, concluded that delaying middle and high school start times «from roughly 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. -LSB-,]» will increase
academic achievement by 0.175 standard deviations on average, with effects for disadvantaged students roughly twice as large as advantaged students, at little or no cost to schools; i.e., a 9 to 1 benefits to costs ratio when utilizing single - tier busing, the
most expensive transportation method available.
Amrein - Beardsley: Again, why only the critiques of other «
academic economists,» or actually just one other
academic economist to be specific (i.e., Jesse Rothstein, who
most would agree is «the
most respected «anti-VAM»
economist)?
Flowers: «That said, I felt like the criticism of the CFR work by other
academic economists, as well as the general caution of the ASA, warranted inclusion — and so I reached out to Jesse Rothstein, the
most respected «anti-VAM»
economist, for comment.
EMH is believed in by almost all
academics — whether finance professors or
economists and probably by
most mutual fund managers — almost all of whom sign off on what is called MCT.
After we determine the
most pressing issues according to reader input, we will ask
economists and
academics to propose policy solutions that best address these challenges while enabling America's prosperity to continue and expand.
To provide examples outside climate science, it would be a consensus among
academic economists that «market capitalism» is by and large the
most effective political economy available to humanity, and among
academic political scientists that «representative democracy» is by and large the
most effective form of political organisation available.
«The impact of the new tax code on the housing market has been heavily studied and debated in
academic, policy and political circles, with
most agreeing that the changes remove any significant tax differences between homeowners and renters for the majority of U.S. households,» First American Chief
Economist Mark Fleming said in a release.
The National Association of Homebuilders released a report saying it will be catastrophic however there isn't really much to worry about for
most American markets according to many
economists and
academics...