Not exact matches
And it's unlike any other book I've ever written, for in addition to the memoir, it includes original poetry, short stories, soliloquies, and even a short screenplay — all aimed at capturing the wonder and beauty of Scripture, while honoring the best in
biblical scholarship and acknowledging the challenges of its
most difficult
passages.
The fact is,
most of the defenses of American slavery were written by clergy who quoted Scripture generously and appealed to a «clear, plain, and common - sense reading» of
biblical passages like Genesis 17:2, Deuteronomy 20:10 - 11, 1 Corinthians 7:21, Ephesians 6:1 - 5, Colossians 3:18 - 25; 4:1, and I Timothy 6:1 - 2.
I utterly reject
Biblical inerrancy http://lotharlorraine.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/on-the-inspiration-of-the-bible-and-other-books-von-der-interpretation-der-bibel-und-anderen-buchern/ but find it interesting that this view of the afterlife is the
most likely interpretation of the
passages, provided one consider the Old Testament imagery in its own context.
Not only that, but many of the
biblical passages that people find the
most troubling, and the
most likely to be «mistaken», are affirmed willy - nilly by Jesus and the apostles with complete disregard for any subsequent controversies that might emerge.
of his entire antiquities, there are two
passages that mention Jesus, 1 merely says his brother was James, and people called him christ (which says nothing about works, resurrection, miracles, teachings), and the other is recognized as
most likely a forgery, even by
biblical scholars.
If anyone were to read the whole of Lewis's writings with an eye only to discover what
biblical passage he
most often cites, one would find, I suspect, that it would be «he that loseth his life shall save it.»
And in reality,
most of us already proclaim a lack of canonicity of certain
Biblical passages in the way we treat them.
The
most significant schism was undoubtedly Martin Luther's, but earlier ones had involved the Coptics and Eastern Orthodox; subsequent ones are too numerous to mention, but spectacularly include the Southern versions of the Baptists and Methodists, whose adherents of nearly 2 centuries ago were more persuaded by the
Biblical passages endorsing slavery than by the COMPETING
Biblical passages commanding love of one's fellow man.
They want to honor women on Mother's Day, so they turn to the
biblical passage most associated with femininity, the one that culminates with what may be the
most cross-stitched Bible verse of all time: «Charm is deceitful and beauty is passing, but a woman who fears the Lord, she shall be praised.»
Most scholars and pastors, however, recognize that this admonition needs to be balanced with other
biblical passages that suggest individuals will at times face a very clear choice between God and Caesar.
If you look at those» certain
biblical passages» you'll discover that
most are pretty common to ancient law codes of the time.
This
passage is perhaps one of the
most powerful
biblical illustrations of how often it is those who walk closest to Jesus prevent children from approaching Him.
The apocalyptic
passages are too deeply imbedded in the Gospels for
most biblical scholars to feel that they can be thus disposed of.
Drawing from the work of
biblical scholars,
most notably James Brownson, Matthew looks at the context, language, and historical background of these
passages to conclude that the Bible does not directly address the issue of same - sex orientation or the expression of that orientation.
The
most commonly cited
biblical passages are Acts 2:31; Ephesians 4:8 - 10; 1 Peter 4:6; and,
most importantly, 1 Peter 3:18 - 20.