Sentences with phrase «most claims paid»

Not exact matches

Tesla employees claim they were fired with almost no warning, and the cuts targeted those who were paid most not just «performance» issues.

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

In 1985, the most recent year for which statistics are available, employers paid $ 21 billion in compensation claims, excluding administrative and litigation costs, compared with $ 5 billion a decade earlier.

As a dual - income couple we are penalized the most which is outrageous since we are already paying more taxes as W - 2 employees than many small business owners who I know do not claim their full income.

Under Section 162 (m), the amount of compensation earned by the Chief Executive Officer, and any executive whose compensation is required to be reported to stockholders by reason of such executive being among the three other most highly - paid executive officers of the Company (excluding the Chief Financial Officer) in the year for which a deduction is claimed by the Company (including its subsidiaries) is limited to $ 1 million per person, except that compensation that is performance - based will be excluded for purposes of calculating the amount of compensation subject to the $ 1 million limitation.

He is able to put the cash to work because most insurance claims are paid out years later.

Notwithstanding the claims of the Obama administration, employers will still be facilitating the coverage to which they object, in the contracts they make with insurance companies, and in most cases will actually still be paying in full for the coverage.

I am somehow claiming to backup all my comments with an implied knowledge of religion and faith, but most likely the last class I took on religion was in high school and even then I was too busy writing the names of bands like Wynger on my Trapper - keeper to have been paying attention.

One view, supported primarily by the United States, Great Britain, and most of the European nations, calls for a «free flow» of information, that is, virtually no governmental restrictions except technical ones; in effect communication flow exists for those who are willing and able to pay for it, and who claim it first.

Yes there are those who claim to be Christian mostly the «evangelical right wing» who believe that Jesus is an American CEO and hates gay people, who believe women should not receive equal pay or rights, and oppose every social justice known to humankind and most if not all are Tea Party Republicans!

You are not paying for health care, you are paying for paper shuffling, lawyers, lobbyists, an army of claims specialists with a financial incentive to deny you coverage, corporate profits and dividends, gargantuan (8 - 9 figure) CEO salaries, bonuses, and golden parachutes for the most badly mismanaged.

Most people who are not senior citizens now wont benefit even in the long run because by the time they can claim benefits they will of already payed 10x its value into it.

The France international has been one of the most exciting attacking players in Europe in recent times, and the Independent recently claimed Liverpool would likely have to pay around # 90million for his signature.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

there is some suggestion that wenger is backtracking on his fervent stance regarding what players would be staying at the club for the remainder of the season... some might deduce that this is all part of a much bigger, more elaborate plan... by shifting the blame wenger is attempting to, not so slyly, flip the narrative... by doing so he hopes to evoke empathy from his most ardent supporters, while attempting to rally any fence - sitters, whose faith was waning unless a more legitimate agent of blame emerges... unfortunately, and incredibly insulting to the fans, when wenger attempts to spin a tale and / or tries to eat his own words, he doesn't seem to play it all the way through in his head, so invariably gaping holes emerge... say we believed his version of the truth, would that not make him either an incredibly well - paid custodian of destruction or a spineless jellyfish because what manager worth his weight in salt would stay at a club that didn't give him final say after 20 years of supposed «success»... no matter the answer, neither bodes well for us... how ironic, in a way, since many pundits claim this team has lacked a «spine» for some years now... so whether we win, lose or draw on Sunday is frankly immaterial, as the problems will remain, and although it will be easier to digest if we left the Pool with 3 points, it might just be the worst result for the betterment of this club... a fact that both breaks my heart and baffles the mind

This club has never paid a dividend to shareholders, making your claims of money going out as fatuous as most of your contribution.

Critics claim that it is high because doctors make money from C - sections (false, most obstetricians get paid the same amount regardless of how the baby is delivered) or because it is more convenient for obstetricians (false, nothing is more convenient than every patient having an uncomplicated vaginal delivery).

But we all know who does the majority of the actual work in hospitals, and most often it's not who claims the most credit or gets paid the most.

Ceal assured me that, although that was a common response, most claim consultants were unaware that insurance companies most often do pay for it.

«Out» has got into most trouble, not least with the high profile defection of the Conservative MP, Sarah Wollaston on the grounds that its claims about the amount the UK pays into the EU are not true.

Most notable is his oft - made claim that middle - class New Yorkers are paying the lowest tax rate in 60 years: This is technically true, but hollow.

Then - Governor George Pataki claimed most of the Empire conversion proceeds for state coffers, hiked taxes on health insurance, and used the money not just to balance the budget, but to increase pay and benefits for hospital and home - care workers.

Speaking to the BBC's Andrew Marr he said that people who do the most important jobs are the lowest paid, and he claimed it is «not good enough».

Probably a number of things including (1) not as wealthy as he claims, (2) lots of Russian debt, (3) does not give money to charity, (4) lots of tax avoidance using Panama, the Cayman's etc, and (5) he pays taxes at a very low rate that most working folk would be outraged by.

Most of the counties which claim a lot of agricultural land pay very few people to work in agriculture.

Peter Kellner finds that most of us think that Britain's welfare bill is too large, that they suspect millions of people of lying to claim benefits, and that we are divided on whether we can still afford to pay state pensions to the better - off

The maps, which he called «absurd,» appear to be a scheme to fund a floundering flood insurance program that pays out most of its claims to hurricane - prone areas, Maffei said.

We need to make sure that we are in control over the things that affects us.Anytime there is flood and people loose their life, most of the blame goes to sitting presidents.I am not saying that the central government does not have responsibility to ensure that enabling environment is created.They have a great work to do but as citizens what is our quota?When you move around Accra, sometimes i becomes angry within myself because i am in doubt as to whether our sanitation laws exit.People because of the tax they claim they pay waits for zoom lion workers to come and clean the choked gutters before our houses and shops either than that, it will remain like that.Is it modernity or civilization that has turned us to forget our traditional values or duties of ensuring that our environments is clean?Everybody in our Ghanaian setting knows the responsibility of men and women in making sure that our environments are clean not waiting for flood to occur and we start blaming sitting presidents.To the media, though your responsibility is to keep governments on it toes, you equally have a mandate in educating the public of what we are expected to do as citizens in other to ensure that our dear nation is a better ecosystem for all of us to live.The attention of the media should be shifted from making politicians popular to making us aware as citizens of our responsibilities.I sometimes get confused to hear journalists calling opponents to comment on issues concerning the sitting governments and the only thing that comes to my mind is what do the journalist want to hear from the political opponents?Nothing.They will end up criticizing without giving an alternative.The media should rather resort in questioning people directly to where the problems are coming from.Let us build our institutions.When it comes to energy issues.Citifm will call Hon.KT Hammond who was a deputy minister living who he worked under (His boss at that time) and I always become confused because what can we expect from him?nothing.

Claiming that «the richest are paying the most», he added: «Those who say otherwise are not being very straight with people and frankly they are frightening people.»

Most PSM program directors say their graduates have no trouble finding jobs that pay well and make good use of their training, and many have data to back up those claims.

In the U.S., where flood insurance does not appeal to most commercial insurers, it is primarily provided by the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program, which has borrowed over $ 25 billion from the national Treasury to help pay its claims.

The claim that a product is «natural» is one to pay special attention to, because it can be used by companies to get around organic certification, and because the meaning of the word is easily stretched and manipulated — after all, even the most complex chemical compound can be traced to a natural source at some point on its journey to the supermarket shelf.

SMS.ac claims 40 million users; 14 % in U.S.. Most other services only have thousands of customers, who typically pay a $ 5 monthly subscription fee.

Many dating websites claim to be free but most are only free to register with and then you have to pay a premium to view other members profiles.

Many dating websites claim to be free but most are only free to register with and then you have to pay a premium to.

The AFT claims that the authors found that charter schools determine pay «in a similar manner to most school districts,» but Podgursky and Ballou in fact found charters far more likely to use merit pay and far less likely to use traditional salary schedules.

Ministers have slapped down the Local Government Association (LGA) over calls for small schools to be «exempt» from the apprenticeship levy, claiming most should not have to pay...

The report's author, Max Eden, explains that while charter enrollments cost district schools over $ 400 million a year, after the state's «unique reimbursement» — which he claims is one of the most generous reimbursement plans in the nation — districts are getting paid a significant amount of money for students they no longer teach.

Not surprisingly, Shelby was also the target of numerous suits and countersuits, most notably by customers of Unique Performance, a Shelby Mustang continuation company he partnered with, who claimed they didn't get the cars they paid for when the company was shut down during a criminal investigation for title washing.

Nissan also claims that, for the most part, customers prefer to pay a bit extra to have that CVT.

None of these agents has a significant track record of sales to commercial (advance - paying) publishers, and most have virtually no documented and verified sales at all (many sales claimed by these agents turn out to be vanity publishers).

Hundreds of companies are ferociously competing to be your publisher - for - pay, selling you a package with one of their ISBNs that will put most of the money you earn from your book sales that you generate into their pockets, publishing your book the way they think will make them the most money, and claiming the majority of your book sales» profits as if they've done anything that remotely resembles what a mainstream traditional publisher would do to publish and promote your book, generate targeted reader interest, and earn every single sale to each individual reader.

After almost a decade, most of the old soldiers thought the claims would never be paid, and were selling them for 10 cents on the dollar.

Second, in spite of their claim that they pay «premium pricing for all of the books currently listed on the NY Times Best Seller List» and their «Get most of the price you paid back!»

Oh, I know most of the editors here would claim they are much more qualified and worthy of the highest pay rate, and they would brag that they never miss a thing.

But since most individuals aren't up to the task of analyzing the finances and claims - paying ability of insurance companies, a more practical way to home in on strong insurers is to look for those that get high financial strength ratings — say, A + or better — from firms like A.M. Best and Standard & Poor's.

Their policy holders were not left out in the cold altogether — most states have guaranty funds for exactly this purpose, making sure that claims are paid.

It means you'll pay more out of pocket if you need to file a claim but most of us will save money in the long run anyway.

I think most people in the beginning stages of taking charge of their personal finances (just out of college, first real job out of college, or starting to pay off credit card debt) should claim no exemptions, and therefore get the maximum amount taken out of their paychecks and loaned to the IRS.

Liability coverage generally includes defense costs, as well, and most policies pay those without regard to the policy limits because it's in the best interest of you, the company, and other policyholders to prove the liability claim before paying it, in order to avoid large settlements for false or frivolous claims.