Most climate change scenarios foresee a shift or expansion of the ranges of many species of plankton, fish and invertebrates towards higher latitudes, by tens of kilometres per decade, contributing to changes in species richness and altered community composition.
Under
most climate change scenarios, dry places are going to get drier, wet places are going to get wetter, and times of drought and plenty will be increasingly unpredictable.
Not exact matches
The IPCC's
climate report says that the
most extreme
scenarios of future warming are looking less likely — but this doesn't
change the big picture
But global CO2 emissions are still on track to meet or exceed the
most extreme emissions
scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change in its 2007 report, and by the
scenarios the panel will use in the report it will release next year, scientists with the Global Carbon Project said.
The
most likely
scenario studied was based on the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change's projections of sea level height by 2100 and corresponding
changes in reef structure.
And
most models looking at future
climate change scenarios did not account for aerosols in the stratosphere.
The post-2000 growth rate exceeds the
most fossil - fuel - dependent A1F1 emissions
scenario developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) in the late 1990s.
Crops affected in the
most extreme
climate change scenario (RCP 8.5).
These
scenarios are among the
most sophisticated and recent explorations of how the future might evolve to address
climate change.»
The science is clear to me and to
most experts in the various fields associated with
climate science: Humans are causing
most of the observed global warming in the past several decades and, if we continue emitting GHGs under a «business as usual»
scenario, it will become increasingly difficult and costly to adapt to the
changes that are likely to occur.
Because of the uncertainties in projected sea level rise over the remainder of this century, Sasmito and his co-authors use both the low and the high sea level rise
scenario from the
most recent International Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) report (AR5).
Close agreement of observed temperature
change with simulations for the
most realistic
climate forcing (
scenario B) is accidental, given the large unforced variability in both model and real world.
Emissions growth for 2000 - 2007 was above even the
most fossil fuel intensive
scenario of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (SRES - IPCC).
As the chart above shows, Sub-Saharan Africa is the
most likely to see people moving internally due to
climate change in all three
scenarios.
Most scenarios that meet the 2 - degree Celsius (3.6 - degree Fahrenheit) cap on global warming endorsed by world leaders require a 40 percent to 70 percent reduction in heat - trapping gases by 2050 from 2010 levels, according to the third installment of the UN's biggest - ever study of
climate change.
«Researchers at Duke University say global warming is not progressing as fast as it would under the
most severe
scenarios outlined by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.»
We then projected the current model into the future
climate change scenarios and identified winter temperature as the
most crucial factor in the model.
In an interview with the Boston Globe on March 9, Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, the Navy's top officer in the Pacific, stated that
climate change was the biggest long - term threat in the Pacific region and «probably the
most likely thing that is going to happen... that will cripple the security environment, probably more likely than the other
scenarios we all often talk about.»
The
most obvious causes of droughts are
changes in the winds, what happens with almost any
climate change scenario.
And even if the projections were certain, why should developing countries invest NOW in adaptation to
climate change which under
most IPCC
scenarios will not be critical for at least 30 years?
In scientific literature a few comparisons between the SRES projections and reality exist, like a 2007 PNAS study, which stated «The emissions growth rate since 2000 was greater than for the
most fossil - fuel intensive of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change emissions
scenarios developed in the late 1990s.»
The
most important thing to remember is that the fight to stop
climate change is not a South Vs North
scenario, in fact, it is a matter of addressing structural problems and reforming the system, because it is destroying people and the environment, both from the North and from the South.
Results from this study suggest a greater than 35 % probability that emissions concentrations will exceed those assumed in the
most severe of the available
climate change scenarios (RCP 8.5), illustrating particular importance for understanding extreme outcomes.
«However, an important detail about our study is that we assumed the
most extreme
climate change scenario in which the concentration of greenhouse gases keeps increasing throughout the 21st century.»
While I reject
most apocalyptic
scenarios as unfounded or unduly speculative, I am convinced that the human contribution to
climate change will cause or exacerbate significant problems in at least some parts of the world.
To summarize,
most of these economic analyses agree that a carbon pricing policy will reduce U.S. GDP - growth by less than 1 % over the next 10 — 40 years as compared to an unrealistically optimistic BAU
scenario in which
climate change does not impact the economy.
Note, also, that
most popular
climate scenarios include an implausibly early peak in global emissions — 2010 in many cases, 2015 - 16 in the case of the Stern Report, the ADAM project, and the U.K.'s Committee on Climate
climate scenarios include an implausibly early peak in global emissions — 2010 in many cases, 2015 - 16 in the case of the Stern Report, the ADAM project, and the U.K.'s Committee on
Climate Climate Change.
Like
most climate - economic modelers, the Nature Climate Change researchers use integrated assessment models (IAMs) to generate their sce
climate - economic modelers, the Nature
Climate Change researchers use integrated assessment models (IAMs) to generate their sce
Climate Change researchers use integrated assessment models (IAMs) to generate their
scenarios.
In the end, perhaps the
most important conclusion in the Nature
Climate Change paper is the simplest and the one that we already knew: «a rapid transformation in energy consumption and land use is needed in all
scenarios.»
-- Southern Ocean Iron Fertilization Experiment (SOFeX)-- The basics of the
most recent expedition — Penny Chisholm's site, which lists many professional papers — Paul Falkowski's article (PDF document)-- DOE article:
Climate Change Scenarios Compel Studies of Ocean Carbon Storage — Government site for carbon sequestration research — An earlier piece Williams wrote on sequestration — Will Ocean Fertilization To Remove Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere Work?
A rational public and private sector response to the threat of storm damage in a
changing climate must therefore acknowledge scientific uncertainties that are likely to persist beyond the time at which decisions will need to be made, focus more on the risks and benefits of planning for the worst case
scenarios, and recognize that the combination of societal trends and the
most confident aspects of
climate change predictions makes future economic impacts substantially more likely than does either one alone.
Most climate scenario construction methods combine model - based estimates of
climate change with observed
climate data (Section 13.3).
See: Prof. Roger Pielke Jr.: «An argument that mitigation of ghgs makes sense in terms of decreasing the future costs of extreme events is not a strong one» — «Even under the assumptions of IPCC, Stern Review, etc. the future costs of extreme events under the
most aggressive
scenarios of
climate change actually decrease as a proportion of GDP»
Mark Fulton, advisor to Carbon Tracker, former head of research at Deutsche Bank
Climate Change Advisors, and co-author of the report, said: «Our work shows thermal coal has the
most significant overhang of unneeded supply in terms of carbon of all fossil fuels on any
scenario.
Firstly, the
most up - to - date tools in earth system science were used to analyse hydro - climatic variability in Peru and surrounding regions for producing
climate change scenarios.
As
most of the excess heat and greenhouse gases from
climate change or even chemical pollutants will go into the ocean, ocean large - scale currents will recirculate that extra load and, at some point, will release some of it back to the atmosphere, where it will keep raising temperatures, regardless of future carbon dioxide emissions
scenarios.
The study, reported by the London Daily Mail, compared its results to the
most severe emissions
scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.
Plibersek takes the
most alarmist interpretation of the
most alarmist
climate change scenarios out there.
Even if
most of you dismiss this possibility, I don't think it is less likely that the
climate change based apocalypse
scenarios.
Rather, the study stated that, out of the range of warming projections outlined by the United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), temperature records suggest that at present time the «middle - of - the - road warming
scenario» is more likely than the
most severe warming projections.
The
most depressing feature of this debate is that anyone who questions the alarmist, doomsday
scenario will automatically be labelled a
climate change «denier», and accused of jeopardising the future of humanity.
Africa's
climate is warmer than it was 100 years ago and model - based projections of future greenhouse gas induced
climate change for the continent project that this warming will continue, and in
most scenarios, accelerate (Hulme et al. 2001; Christensen et al. 2007).
But
most do predict a range of weather
scenarios, and warming watchers are eagerly awaiting next spring's report from the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.
The
scenario painted in the film «The Day After Tomorrow» seems extremely unlikely, even to
most climate change advocates, but one could easily make a far more convincing version, based not on the effects of
climate change, but the efforts of some crackpot to «save the world» from same by implementing some well meaning scheme that could all too easily lead to a disaster far more immediate and possibly far more destructive than anything a few degrees of temperature rise could produce.
At the time of the TAR,
most CCIAV studies utilised
climate scenarios (many based on the IS92 emissions
scenarios), but very few applied contemporaneous
scenarios of socio - economic, land - use, or other environmental
changes.