Sentences with phrase «most decisions about the child»

Sole legal custody means that only one parent has the authority to make important decisions for the child, while joint legal custody means that both parents have to make all or most decisions about the child together.

In situations where a parent has full legal and physical custody of a child, the rights of the custodial parent are significant and include the ability to make all or most decisions about a child's day - to - day life.

Not exact matches

A little later my dad came in and sat down on the edge of the bed and said quietly that we should have a conversation about Sunday Mass, and probably I was now old enough to make my own decisions about attending Mass, that he and my mother did not think it right or fair to force that decision on us children, that we needed to find our own ways spiritually, and that while he and our mother very much hoped that we would walk in the many rewarding paths of the Church, the final decision there would be ours alone, each obeying his own conscience; that was only right and fair, and to decree attendance now would perhaps actually force us away from the very thing that he and my mother found to be the most nutritious spiritual food; so perhaps you and I and your mother can sit and discuss this later this afternoon, he said, and come to some amicable agreement.

In the end, it all comes back to education: In the ideal world, a parent's decision about whether to allow a child to start playing or continue playing collision sports before high school under current rules of play (which are evolving in the direction of safety, fortunately, as seen, for instance, in USA Hockey's ban on body checking at the Pee Wee hockey level and below, and limits on full - contact practices instituted at every level of football, from Pop Warner, to high school, college, and the NFL), will be a conscious one; a decision in which the risks of participating in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the child of participating.

Most children are not mature enough to make an informed decision about visitation.

You are thinking about making one of the most important decisions of your life: bringing a child into the world and giving it all the love, devotion, and caring needed to ensure that s / he leads a happy, well - balanced, and fulfilling life.

Most parenting plans define a regular schedule for both parents to communicate with each other about the children's lives and decision making.

Making decisions about where children will live is one of the most frightening and difficult tasks of divorce.

There can be an alarming amount of labeling by members of what is and isn't AP and who is and isn't «AP enough,» and I feel like my most important role as an API Leader when these hot - topic issues come up is reminding everyone that it's all about finding the balance of what works best for our individual families while maintaining an active, involved attachment to our children regardless of what personal decisions we make.

At Autism Parenting Magazine we aim to provide you with the most current information and interventions about Autism so that you can make the most informed decisions about what will benefit your child.

As you consider becoming a surrogate, think carefully about the legal and medical agreements you will have to establish with the intended parents, who ultimately can make most of the decisions regarding the child as long as it does not put you in a compromising situation.

Some barriers include the negative attitudes of women and their partners and family members, as well as health care professionals, toward breastfeeding, whereas the main reasons that women do not start or give up breastfeeding are reported to be poor family and social support, perceived milk insufficiency, breast problems, maternal or infant illness, and return to outside employment.2 Several strategies have been used to promote breastfeeding, such as setting standards for maternity services3, 4 (eg, the joint World Health Organization — United Nations Children's Fund [WHO - UNICEF] Baby Friendly Initiative), public education through media campaigns, and health professionals and peer - led initiatives to support individual mothers.5 — 9 Support from the infant's father through active participation in the breastfeeding decision, together with a positive attitude and knowledge about the benefits of breastfeeding, has been shown to have a strong influence on the initiation and duration of breastfeeding in observational studies, 2,10 but scientific evidence is not available as to whether training fathers to manage the most common lactation difficulties can enhance breastfeeding rates.

Their decision to invite the poster child for Social Security privatization into their districts says more about their backward views on Social Security — the most popular and effective social program in history — than any campaign ad ever could.»

sean is a true gentleman and a great guy cares about his community and knows exactly how to get things done for his future constituents he WILL bring home the bacon for his district and do whats right when those decisions are most needed now for our fiscal security and our future for our children i will be voting for Sean FOR SURE — lets support a proven leader and a great american

«Let the local teachers and parents and school boards, the people who care the most about their local school children, make decisions about standards, curriculum and assessments,» Hawkins said.

«Let the local teachers and parents and school boards and people who care the most about their local school children and the make decisions about standards, curriculum and assessments,» Hawkins said.

I love reading about the children of others and I'll admit that it feels somewhat disingenuous as someone who is pretty open about most things to not include information about this creature who astounds (and challenges me) constantly, but it's a decision that I made and I'm sticking to it (for at least right now).

The current reality is that most education reporters have more in common, racially and otherwise, with educators (still mostly white, college - educated women), and with well - educated parents who are making decisions about their own children's education.

The core of this dialogue though is most definitely about parents making decisions for children.

After all, teachers are highly motivated when decisions affect their classrooms (Lortie 1975), and most parents are deeply concerned about their children.

However, if the NAEP results are accurate, it is not true that poor children are now at least getting the basics: the score increases on state (or local, as in Chicago) tests simply indicates that somewhat different particular things are taught, but overall NAEP results show there usually is no improvement in states which test the most and use tests for high - stakes decisions about students.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the players in this initiative are absolutely and totally silent about the biggest issue of all; If the Renzulli teaching model works, and I'm sure it does knowing his level of expertise on the subject, the logical and appropriate public policy decision would be to insert Renzulli's approach into more schools and provide a broader range of children, included those «most gifted,» with the benefits of curriculum that includes «enrichment clusters that stimulate investigation and creativity, making learning fun.»

Parents are generally kept in the dark about how the most important decisions affecting their children's education are made.

You'll usually need to do this within one month of a decision about most benefits, tax credits or child maintenance (sometimes known as «child support»).

One of the most challenging aspects of a separation can be coming to an agreement about custody and parenting time: where the children will live, how decisions will be made, where they will go to -LSB-...]

However, at ReSolutions, we believe that parents are the most qualified experts on their own children and that they are uniquely suited to make decisions about parenting.

I work with children, teens, adults, and couples who are seeking counseling to support concerns they have, make decisions about their present and future, and most importantly, strengthen relationships.

When the court is making its decision about who should have custody of the child, the most important factor for it is the welfare of the child.

You'll usually need to do this within one month of a decision about most benefits, tax credits or child maintenance (sometimes known as «child support»).

When making decisions about children, what matters the most is that parents focus on what would be in the best interests of their child.

In a divorce, parents must decide residential custody, establishing where the child will live most of the time; and legal custody, which determines whether one or both parents can make major decisions for the child, such as decisions about education, health care, and religious training.

In the law, «custody» is made up of two things: the right to make important life decisions for and about your child (legal custody) and the ability to have your child live with you most of the time (residential custody).

Who are the most competent people to make decision about their children's future?

Collaborative Divorce is designed for those couples who do not want to turn their most important decisions about finances and children over to attorneys or judges.

«The data that we present in the 2011 Rhode Island Kids Count factbook can help policy makers make informed decisions about what programs and policies are most important to ensuring the success of our children and our state.»

These guides are designed to help patients, families, and physicians make informed decisions about obtaining and administering the most appropriate care for a child with ADHD or depression.

Most children are not mature enough to make an informed decision about visitation.

They don't have to consult the parents or anyone else with parental responsibility about most decisions for the child.

Making decisions about where children will live is one of the most frightening and difficult tasks of divorce.

Most non-resident parents are either often or always consulted about major decisions surrounding the child.

In general, custody refers both to where the child actually lives (physical custody) and which parent makes most of the decisions about the child (legal custody)

• Primary legal and physical custody means being the person the child lives with and the person that makes most decisions about how to raise the child.

The assessment typically provides information related to and recommendations about the most appropriate residential schedule for the child and the most appropriate structure for making child - related decisions.